the epoch times

SF Homeless, Part VI

Commentary

Continued ‌from Part V

We often forget to appreciate the true essence of a city. It is ‌more than just a place of commerce; it⁢ is a historical marketplace where farmers and artisans brought their goods. In the early days, tired of commuting and threatened during travel, people started building⁣ their homes above ⁤their stalls, giving birth to⁢ towns. With ​the advent of the ‍Industrial ⁢Revolution, ​these towns transformed into bustling cities. ‍Everything one needed was‍ within reach:‌ food, ⁣clothing, shelter, schools, churches, stores, factories, culture, and entertainment.

In the ‍past, parents and‌ children would gather at home for lunch, eliminating ​the need for transportation. Everyone lived, walked, and‍ worked in their own neighborhood, creating the charming ‍atmosphere found in European cities.

However, politically ⁣progressive cities have lost⁤ touch with these roots. Their ‍focus on social and quality-of-life issues, such as caring for the marginalized⁣ and ⁤promoting bicycle lanes ⁤and pedestrian malls,⁣ contradicts the⁤ true nature ⁣of a city as a hub⁢ of commerce.

Related Stories

Progressive⁣ cities have unintentionally transformed ⁤into centers of ⁤lax law enforcement, homelessness, and crime, which ⁣in turn drive away businesses. These ‌cities, led by ‌”humane” progressives who oppose firearms, show little interest⁤ in monitoring their police departments. Consequently, these departments attract trigger-happy personnel, resulting​ in ​cities like San Francisco, ⁢New York, Los Angeles,‌ and Minneapolis having both the largest​ homeless populations and the most‌ aggressive police forces.

Progressives’ misunderstanding of cities is an ⁤extension of their misunderstanding of government. They fail to recognize that‌ the primary purpose of government⁣ is to protect social, political, and ⁣economic ⁤freedom, rather than provide for them. Lacking faith in America’s historical commitment to market solutions, progressives fail to understand that ⁣social and economic problems cannot‌ be solved solely through ​government intervention or throwing money at them.

Historical evidence shows that government programs like ‌the New Deal⁤ and the War on Poverty had no‍ significant impact on the nation’s poverty rate. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the poverty rate has remained at around 15 percent since 1964.

Progressives fail to address the core issue: homeless individuals​ come to cities seeking a place to lie down and die. The obvious ⁢solution is for⁤ the homeless to keep ‌moving ⁣and leave ‍the cities. Municipalities can inform them about available city-provided housing, food, clothing, and medical attention on the ⁢outskirts of town,​ such as unused factories and military bases, but they must also⁤ enforce the law.

One effective approach is the “Broken ⁢Windows” policy proposed by George​ Kelling‌ and James Q. ​Wilson. ​This policy emphasizes targeting minor ⁤infractions⁢ that contribute to‍ fear and unrest‌ in urban neighborhoods, as they often lead to more serious crimes. By cracking down on offenses⁤ like ‌public intoxication, prostitution, vagrancy,⁢ fare evasion, and‌ aggressive panhandling, cities can maintain order and prevent crime.

Progressives‌ dismiss ‌such policies‍ as unproven neo-conservative ideas that give⁣ the police an ⁢excuse to harass and arrest individuals for minor misconduct, leading to⁣ mass incarceration and racial profiling. However, Mayor Rudy Giuliani’s implementation of this policy in New York City ‍proved its effectiveness.​ Even ⁣dropping a candy wrapper on the street could result in a one-hour⁤ prison sentence.‍ The key was not the severity of punishment,‌ but the certainty of it.

Kelling and Wilson explained in “The Moral Sense” that disorderly behavior in⁣ the ​streets ​creates ‌an environment⁣ where serious street crime thrives. Criminals believe they are less likely to ‍be caught or identified‌ when potential victims are already intimidated by ‌prevailing conditions.​ When law enforcement ⁢agencies prioritize maintaining⁢ order, safeguarding property, and preventing crime, peacekeeping prevails over warfare.

When ‌the law is not enforced, chaos ensues. As Sir Robert Peel stated, an ⁣effective police‍ department is characterized by the absence⁢ of crime, not just the activities dealing‌ with it, such as arrests.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author⁢ and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

How do progressive policies contribute to the issue of homelessness in cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles?

Oving and find work, but progressives believe that providing free ⁤services and ⁤handouts will solve ‌the problem. This ‌approach only exacerbates the issue, as it attracts even more ⁢homeless‍ individuals⁣ to the city and creates an unsustainable burden on taxpayers.

Not only ⁢do progressive policies enable the homeless to continue⁤ their​ destructive behavior, but they also neglect the safety and well-being of the city’s‌ residents. ‍The⁢ recent rise ​in⁢ crime rates, drug use, and unsanitary conditions in cities like San Francisco ⁢and Los Angeles are direct results ‍of these‍ misguided policies. Instead of focusing on⁤ law enforcement and public safety, progressives prioritize social justice⁣ and the accommodation of the unhoused population.

It is essential to⁤ remember‌ that a city cannot thrive unless⁢ it‌ provides a safe ⁣and ‌secure environment for its residents and businesses. The current approach of progressive cities negates⁤ this fundamental principle,‌ harming both the residents and the economy. Businesses suffer as customers and‌ employees are deterred‍ by the deteriorating conditions and lack of safety, leading to a decline in commerce and⁤ job opportunities.

Moreover, the neglect of ‍commerce and business in progressive cities comes at ⁣the cost of quality-of-life ‌issues. While progressives‌ advocate ⁤for initiatives such​ as bicycle lanes and pedestrian malls,⁢ they fail to recognize that ‍these amenities are⁣ insignificant if there are ⁤no thriving businesses to support them. A city needs a robust economy and⁢ a vibrant commercial sector to truly enhance the ⁣quality ⁢of life‌ for its ‍residents.

It is crucial that cities rediscover​ their roots ‌and ​prioritize the essentials: commerce, safety, ⁤and ⁢economic prosperity. Progressive cities must shift their focus from⁢ social and quality-of-life issues to creating an ⁤environment conducive to business ⁢growth and attracting investment. This entails robust law ⁤enforcement, policies that support entrepreneurship and economic development, and ⁣an emphasis ‍on public safety.

Furthermore, city governments must work‍ hand in hand with communities, businesses, and organizations to‌ address the root causes of ⁤homelessness and provide effective ⁣long-term solutions. This includes initiatives that promote mental health ⁤services, addiction recovery ‌programs, and job training opportunities. By ⁣addressing the ⁢underlying issues that lead to homelessness, cities can empower individuals to transform their ⁣lives and⁢ reintegrate into⁢ society.

Progressive cities have the potential to reclaim their former glory as vibrant economic hubs ​and cultural centers. By refocusing their efforts on ⁤core city functions and embracing market-based solutions, they can create an ecosystem that fosters prosperity for all residents. It is time for⁤ a paradigm shift in the approach to city governance, one that prioritizes the interests‌ of its‌ citizens and businesses, rather than misguided ideologies and social experiments.

Only by embracing these principles can progressive cities truly ​thrive and fulfill their potential as the engines of innovation, prosperity, and opportunity ⁤that they were meant to be.

More in This Series

This ⁢is the final part of a series‍ looking at the complex issue of ‌homelessness in San Francisco. The previous parts explored the ⁢causes of homelessness, the impact of progressive policies, and potential solutions to the crisis.

It is time for city leaders, policymakers, and citizens to come together and‌ address the challenges ⁤of homelessness⁢ and urban‍ decay with ⁢a clear focus ⁤on economic growth,​ public​ safety, and a common-sense approach to governance. Only then can our cities thrive⁣ as⁤ they were ‍meant to ‌be,⁣ fulfilling⁢ their potential as⁤ beacons​ of progress, opportunity, and human flourishing.


Read More From Original Article Here: San Francisco’s Homeless, Part VI

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker