the epoch times

Retirees may face a $17,400 benefit cut by 2033, says analysis.

The Future of Social Security ⁢Benefits

The average retired couple could ⁣see their ⁢Social Security benefits reduced by⁤ $17,400 in 2033 as funding for the program diminishes over the coming decade, according to a recent analysis.

The Social Security⁣ program is‌ funded by the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund. ‌Trustees for the Social Security program‌ project that OASI would deplete its ⁣reserves by 2033, the Committee​ for a Responsible ⁣Federal Budget (CRFB) pointed ‌out in an Aug. 8 post. At the time,​ today’s 57-year-olds will ⁤hit‍ the normal retirement age while the youngest retirees⁣ at present will turn 72.

“Upon ‍insolvency, the law mandates that the OASI trust fund can only spend in amounts equal to incoming ⁣trust fund⁣ revenue, which means ⁣that all 70 million retirees, dependents, and survivors—regardless ​of age, income, or need—will see their benefits cut by 23 percent,” the analysis‌ states.

Related Stories

“For a typical ‍dual-income couple retiring in 2033, we estimate this would ​represent an⁣ immediate $17,400 ‌cut in ​current dollar annual benefits and an immediate $13,100 ​cut for⁤ a typical single-income‍ couple.”

Lower-income, dual-income couples that retire in 2033⁤ could see a $10,600‌ reduction ​in benefits, while a high-income, dual-income couple could see benefits cut by $23,000.

CRFB pointed out that though⁤ low-income couples‌ would see a smaller reduction, the ⁣cuts ⁤would ‍represent‌ a significant share of ⁤their ⁤income. As a consequence, poverty among this​ demographic can “rise significantly” once OASI becomes insolvent.

The estimates of benefit reductions ‍are in current nominal dollars. “Adjusted for inflation, we estimate​ a⁢ typical dual-income couple⁢ would face ​a $14,000 cut, while low-income couples would ⁤face a $8,500 ​cut and high-income ⁣couples would​ face a $18,500 cut.”

“As the 2024‌ presidential‌ campaign ramps ⁤up,‍ candidates are facing ‌pressure to pledge not to touch Social Security,” CRFB said​ while pointing out‌ that ⁣such a pledge is often framed as “protecting benefits” of beneficiaries.

However, “any 2024‌ presidential candidate who pledges not to touch Social Security is implicitly endorsing a ​23 percent across-the-board benefit cut for‌ the​ 70⁤ million retirees when the Social Security retirement ​trust fund reaches⁣ insolvency in just a decade.”

Political Stance on Social ⁢Security

The CRFB report comes as Social Security is a key topic of the upcoming⁢ 2024‌ elections. Presidential candidates have ‍largely been reluctant to commit to making any major changes to the Social Security program.

In his State ‌of the Union address ‍on Feb. ⁣7, President Joe Biden said that “some⁤ Republicans want⁢ Medicare and Social Security to sunset every ‍five years.”

“I won’t let ⁢that happen. Social Security and Medicare are ⁣a‌ lifeline for millions of seniors … ⁤If anyone tries to cut Social ‍Security, I will stop them.”

Meanwhile, ‍leading Republican ⁤presidential candidate, former President Donald Trump, said in January that “under ⁢no⁢ circumstances should Republicans vote to cut a single penny from ​Medicare or Social ⁣Security to‍ help pay for Joe Biden’s reckless spending spree.”

Former‌ President⁣ Donald Trump at Trump​ National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey, on ‍Aug.⁤ 13, 2023. (Mike Stobe/Getty Images)

“Save Social Security. Don’t destroy it. The Democrats are looking to ⁢destroy Social Security. We’re not going to let them ‌do it.”

Florida’s Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, another GOP candidate for the ⁣2024​ president, said in an interview ​with Fox News in March that “we are not going to mess with Social Security as Republicans.”

The stance ⁤of presidential candidates on the issue ‌of‌ Social Security has drawn criticism ⁣from experts.

In an interview with CNBC, Whit Ayres, president of North Star Opinion Research, a center-right ⁣political polling operation, said that ⁢the situation is now ripe for a hero to emerge who can put the Social Security program on ⁢a sound financial footing.

“It’s fundamentally irresponsible to say we’re not going to touch it when everybody who’s ever looked‍ at the finances of‌ the program‌ recognizes that it’s going bankrupt,” he ⁢said.

Alex Durante,⁢ an economist ‍at ‌the ​Tax⁢ Foundation, pointed out that it is impossible to deal with ‌America’s current spending situation without addressing programs like Social Security, which along with Medicare makes up over two-thirds of the country’s budget.

“The longer we push⁤ this⁢ out, it becomes more difficult to ‌try to protect everyone that receives the benefits. ​It’s important th



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
×
Adam
Adam
News Journalist
Hello, I am Adam, how can I help you?
 
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker