GOP Members Fined by Pelosi Appeal to Supreme Court
Republicans Take Their Case Against Nancy Pelosi to the Supreme Court
Recently, three Republican representatives made a bold move by asking the Supreme Court to hear their lawsuit against former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. The lawsuit stems from fines imposed on the representatives for violating the House of Representatives mask mandate in 2021.
The Republican representatives, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, and Ralph Norman of South Carolina, took legal action after being fined $500 each for entering the House floor without masks, which was a direct violation of a rule imposed by Pelosi in 2020. Their petition, filed on November 21, urged the Supreme Court to consider whether this rule violates the 27th Amendment, which states that changes in compensation should not take effect until after the next election.
In their petition, the representatives emphasized the concerns of the Founding Fathers regarding pay increases and the potential for financial retaliation against members of Congress. They argued that such retaliation could undermine the independence of members and discourage qualified individuals of modest means from serving in the national legislature.
The attorneys in our lawsuit against Speaker Pelosi just filed a Petition for Cert at the Supreme Court.
Pelosi imposed salary reductions on me, @RepMTG, and @RepRalphNorman for our refusal to wear a mask in 2021. At issue: is the 27th amdt. to the Constitution even enforceable? pic.twitter.com/4sjiSGPpWN
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) November 28, 2023
The District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals, in June, ruled that Pelosi and other defendants named in the lawsuit, including former House Sergeant at Arms William Walker and House Chief Administrative Officer Catherine Szpindor, were immune from the lawsuit due to the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause.
The representatives argue that allowing the lower court’s opinion to stand would render the 27th Amendment “non-justiciable” and potentially open the floodgates to unfathomable disciplinary actions. They expressed concerns that the House Rules, under this doctrine, could impose severe physical punishments without any judicial remedy.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Source: Republicans Whom Nancy Pelosi Fined Take Their Case All the Way to Supreme Court (The Western Journal)
What is the argument put forth by the representatives in their petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court regarding Congress’s ability to enforce fines without a vote?
Tition for Certiorari with the Supreme Court. We are asking the Court to decide whether Congress can enforce fines against its own members without a vote. They have NEVER done this before. This is a big deal. pic.twitter.com/7dWIHYPZ3H
— Rep. Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) November 23, 2021
The fines imposed on the representatives were part of the House’s effort to enforce its mask mandate, which was put in place to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 within the Capitol. However, the representatives argued that the House’s rule, implemented unilaterally by Speaker Pelosi, violated their rights as elected officials.
In their petition, the lawmakers pointed out that the 27th Amendment was specifically designed to prevent Congress from tampering with its members’ salaries during an ongoing term. They argued that the fines imposed on them by Pelosi for violating the mask mandate amounted to an effective salary reduction, thereby infringing upon the spirit of the 27th Amendment.
The representatives further stressed the potential for abuse and undue influence that could result from allowing the House to unilaterally impose fines on its members. They expressed concerns about the possibility of political retaliation and financial pressure being exerted by the Speaker to punish dissenting voices or dissuade individuals of modest means from running for Congress.
Although some critics argue that the Supreme Court should not involve itself in what they consider an internal matter of the House, others believe that it is a fundamental issue that warrants the Court’s attention. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the balance of power and the rights of elected officials within the legislative branch, as well as for the ability of future Speakers to unilaterally impose fines on their colleagues.
It is important to note that this lawsuit is not the first time Republican representatives have challenged Pelosi’s policies. Throughout her tenure as Speaker, Pelosi has faced numerous lawsuits and legal challenges from Republican lawmakers seeking to challenge her authority or policy decisions. These legal battles highlight the deep divisions between the two major political parties in Congress and the contentious nature of the current political landscape.
As the case makes its way to the Supreme Court, it will be interesting to see how the Court weighs the concerns raised by the Republican representatives against the authority of the House and the Speaker. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the power dynamics within Congress and set a precedent for future disputes between legislators and the leadership of the House.
Regardless of the Court’s decision, the case serves as a reminder of the constant battles and legal wrangling that take place in the realm of American politics. It also provides insight into the ongoing efforts by both political parties to challenge and defend their respective positions and agendas.
While it is uncertain how the Supreme Court will rule on this particular case, it is clear that the arguments put forth by the Republican representatives are rooted in constitutional principles and the protection of the rights and independence of elected officials. This case has the potential to shape the future of Congress and the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches, making it a pivotal moment in American political history.
As the legal process unfolds, it will be important for the American public to closely follow the developments and implications of this case. The outcome could have a lasting impact on the ability of elected officials to govern independently and the extent to which the actions of the House Speaker can be challenged and questioned.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
