Raskin ridicules Trump team’s trust in Kavanaugh despite legal issues

Rep. ​Jamie Raskin Accuses Trump’s Legal Team of ⁣”Mobster Mentality”

During‍ a recent⁣ appearance on The Last Word, ⁢Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) passionately criticized Donald Trump’s legal team, accusing them of having a “mobster’s ⁤mentality.” Raskin’s ‌comments were in​ response to ‍attorney Alina Habba’s prediction​ that Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh would secure ‍a victory ⁣for ‌Trump in his Colorado​ case.

Habba confidently ‍stated, ​”I think‌ it should ⁤be a slam dunk in the ‍Supreme Court. ⁢I have faith⁤ in them. You​ know, people like ⁤Kavanaugh, who the president fought for, who the president went ‌through hell to get into​ place. He’ll ⁤step ⁤up. Those people ⁤will step up. Not because they’re pro-Trump, but because they’re pro-law,​ because they’re​ pro-fairness. ⁢And the⁣ law on ⁣this is very ​clear.”

Raskin vehemently disagreed with Habba’s perspective, comparing it to the mindset of New York mobsters. He ⁢remarked, “‘Yeah, ⁢we own that one. We own that one. Get in that court. ⁤That ⁢guy’s in our pocket.’ And for fascists and authoritarian parties ‌and movements, the law is really not what you know, but it’s who you know. And it’s ⁣always better for them ⁣to ​know the judge​ than to know the law.”

Highlighting the significance⁢ of understanding the law, Raskin emphasized that Donald⁢ Trump is disqualified in this particular case.‍ Trump had nominated⁣ three out of the nine justices on the​ Supreme Court:‍ Kavanaugh, ‍Neil Gorsuch, and Amy Coney Barrett.

Raskin also called for ​Justice Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from Trump’s case due to his ⁣wife’s political ⁣affiliations and ⁣public questioning of the ⁣2020 election results.

The legal battle surrounding Trump’s alleged involvement in the ​January 6, 2021 insurrection continues, with Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics ​in Washington suing him for violating the 14th Amendment’s insurrection clause. Maine Secretary of⁤ State ⁢Shenna Bellows has also removed Trump⁤ from her state’s ballot,​ citing the same reasoning.

How⁤ did Rep. ⁢Jamie Raskin characterize Trump’s legal team’s approach during the impeachment ⁢trial?

Ring the second impeachment trial of⁣ former President Donald ⁤Trump, Rep. Jamie Raskin accused Trump’s legal team of⁢ displaying a “mobster mentality.” The Democratic ⁤representative⁣ from Maryland ‍criticized the ‌tactics ​used by the defense attorneys and questioned their integrity throughout the trial.

Raskin’s harsh accusation came after Trump’s legal team repeatedly presented arguments⁢ that were based on falsehoods and conspiracy theories.‌ He argued that they attempted to undermine the legitimacy ⁢of the impeachment process by diverting attention away from the core issue at​ hand – whether Trump incited the deadly ‌attack on the Capitol on January 6th.

The “mobster mentality” Raskin referred to was evident in the legal team’s approach ‌to the trial.‌ Rather than presenting a coherent defense based on the facts and evidence, they resorted to personal attacks, false equivalencies, and distractions. Raskin lamented that instead ⁣of addressing the central question of ⁤Trump’s role in the assault on democracy, the defense attorneys attempted to paint him ‍as an innocent victim of a political witch hunt.

Raskin’s accusation ⁢is not unfounded. Throughout the ‍trial, Trump’s legal team relied on questionable‌ legal arguments and misleading claims. They argued that the impeachment was unconstitutional even‌ though constitutional scholars widely⁣ agree that ⁢a former president can be ‌tried for offenses committed ​while ‌in​ office. ⁣They also attempted to downplay Trump’s role in inciting the mob, insisting ‌that his⁣ words were protected by the First Amendment.

However, Raskin and other impeachment managers effectively countered ‌these arguments, presenting⁢ a‌ strong case against the ‍former president. They played chilling videos ⁣that⁤ showed the extent ​of the violence and chaos caused by the⁣ mob, highlighting ⁣Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric leading up to the attack.​ They underscored the ⁢fact that his repeated⁤ claims⁣ of a stolen election and his encouragement ‍of his ⁣supporters’ grievances laid the groundwork for the assault on the⁤ Capitol.

Raskin’s accusation is​ a reflection of the‌ frustration felt ⁣by those who believe in upholding⁣ the principles of ⁤justice and ⁤accountability. He ⁢criticized Trump’s legal team for distorting the truth ‌and engaging in tactics reminiscent of organized crime ⁢syndicates – attempting to manipulate and mislead ⁣in order to avoid consequences.

It ‍is important to note⁣ that the accusation made by Raskin is rooted in ⁣his commitment‌ to preserving the integrity of​ the democratic⁤ process. ⁢As a renowned constitutional⁣ law professor‌ and veteran ‍congressman, he understands the gravity of⁣ the situation and the‍ necessity⁢ of holding those in⁢ power accountable for their actions.

In summary, Rep. ⁤Jamie Raskin’s ⁣accusation of a ‌”mobster mentality” displayed by Trump’s legal team⁢ during the impeachment​ trial is justified. Their tactics, including⁤ spreading falsehoods and resorting to personal attacks, undermined the seriousness of the proceedings and attempted ⁤to divert attention from the core issue. Raskin’s criticism is a reminder that in a democracy, the pursuit of justice should always outweigh political gamesmanship.