Ranked choice voting explained
Ranked choice voting (RCV) is set to debut in Washington, D.C., for teh 2026 election cycle, replacing the city’s previous approach with a system where voters can rank up to five candidates by preference. Voters are encouraged to order choices without skipping ranks or repeating the same candidate.
under RCV, if no candidate wins a majority based on first-choice votes, the lowest-ranked candidate is eliminated adn their votes are transferred to voters’ next choices. This process continues until a candidate reaches majority support. In contests with multiple seats (like city council races), the threshold to win a seat can be below 50% because more positions are available.
RCV has spread across the U.S. over the past two decades and is required in some states, banned in others, and legally unclear in many. It is already used in locations including Alaska and Maine,and in major cities such as New York City and San Francisco. D.C. adopted it through Initiative 83 in 2024.
Supporters say RCV gives voters a stronger voice while reducing the “spoiler effect,” allowing voters to support a long-shot first choice and still have their vote count if that candidate is eliminated. They also argue it can save money by reducing the need for separate runoff elections, and may encourage less negative campaigning and broader coalition-building. They further contend it can make it easier for more candidates-especially independents and third-party contenders-to run without being dismissed as spoilers.
Opponents counter that RCV is more intricate and may confuse voters accustomed to choosing a single candidate. They also point to “ballot exhaustion,” where ballots that only rank eliminated candidates may not count in later rounds, and they cite concerns about delays and reduced openness when results require multiple tabulation stages, particularly with absentee and mail-in ballots.
For most voters,the immediate change is simply the ability to rank multiple candidates. The D.C. election is being viewed as a key early test of whether residents adapt smoothly and how effectively the system produces results.
Elections are the cornerstone of a functioning democracy, and the 2026 election cycle is already underway with several closely watched races across the country. In less than two weeks, voters in Washington, D.C., will use a new voting system for the first time: ranked choice voting.
Ranked choice voting allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference rather than selecting just one. In Washington, voters can rank up to five candidates for a given office. Voters are not required to rank all five choices, but election officials encourage voters to rank candidates in the order they prefer without skipping rankings or selecting the same candidate more than once.
Recommended Stories
If a candidate receives more than 50% of first-choice votes, they win outright. If no candidate reaches a majority, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. Ballots cast for that candidate are then redistributed to voters’ next-ranked choices. The process repeats until one candidate receives a majority of the remaining votes.
When the ranking system is used in multi-winner elections, such as city council races, the percentage of votes needed to win a seat is less than 50% since more seats are up for election.
Ranked choice voting has expanded across the country over the past two decades. The voting method is required in eight states, banned in 19 states, and holds an unclear legal status in the other 23 states.
Ranked choice voting is used in dozens of jurisdictions across the United States, including statewide elections in Alaska and Maine and local elections in cities such as New York City and San Francisco. Washington, D.C., voters approved the system through Initiative 83 in 2024.
Supporters argue ranked choice voting gives voters a more complete voice in elections by allowing them to support their preferred candidate without worrying about “wasting” their vote.
One of the most frequently cited benefits is the reduction of the so-called spoiler effect, in which candidates with little chance of winning can siphon votes away from ideologically similar contenders. Under ranked choice voting, voters can rank a long-shot candidate first and still have their vote count toward another candidate if their top choice is eliminated.
Advocates also say the system can save taxpayer money by eliminating separate runoff elections, which often draw significantly lower turnout than general elections. New York City and San Francisco have both pointed to savings from avoiding additional election rounds.
Some researchers have found that candidates in ranked choice elections are more likely to seek support from voters backing their opponents, creating incentives for less negative campaigning and broader coalition-building.
Supporters further contend the system can encourage more candidates to run for office, particularly independents, third-party candidates, and candidates from underrepresented communities, because they are less likely to be viewed as spoilers.
Opponents, however, argue ranked choice voting makes elections unnecessarily complicated and can create confusion among voters used to choosing a single candidate. Critics say voters are effectively asked to evaluate and rank multiple candidates rather than simply selecting their favorite, placing a greater burden on voters to research the field.
Another common criticism deals with “ballot exhaustion.” If a voter ranks only candidates who are later eliminated, their ballot may no longer count in the final rounds of tabulation. Opponents argue this means some voters are effectively excluded from the decisive stages of the election.
Critics have also pointed to delays in election results in some jurisdictions, particularly when absentee and mail-in ballots must be processed before multiple rounds of tabulation can be completed. Some election skeptics argue the counting process is less transparent than traditional elections and can make it harder for voters to understand how a winner emerged, even if the final outcome is mathematically straightforward.
RANDY FEENSTRA LOSS DELIVERS BLOW TO TRUMP-ENDORSED CANDIDATE SUCCESS RATE
For most voters, casting a ranked choice ballot will be similar to voting in previous elections. The biggest difference is that they will have the option to rank multiple candidates rather than selecting just one.
The upcoming election will provide the first major test of ranked choice voting in the nation’s capital and could offer an early indication of how quickly Washingtonians adapt to the new system.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
