Democrats and courts are taking gender-confused kids for ideological purposes
Parents Fight for Custody After Child Removed from Home for Refusing to Accept “Gender Identity”
Two parents in Indiana are locked in a custody battle after their child was taken from their home due to their refusal to acknowledge his preferred gender identity.
According to Fox News, the Coxes came under investigation in 2021 when it was discovered that they were not using their child’s preferred gender identity. As a result, the teenager was removed from their custody and placed in a “gender-affirming” home. The decision was upheld by an appeals court, and now the Coxes are appealing to the Supreme Court for help.
When ideological zealots steal children from their parents based on these imaginary offenses, it is de facto kidnapping. “They are coming for your children” in the most literal sense — this was always the endgame of gender ideology.
Although these incidents may seem isolated, they are part of a larger pattern. We have seen this before with hormone blockers and transgender surgeries for children. As these cases gain attention, watch for the familiar progression: denial, rarity claims, and eventually full acceptance with opposition labeled as bigotry and support for child abuse.
One example of this pattern is the recent controversy surrounding a bill introduced in Maine, LD 1735. Critics dismissed concerns raised by conservatives, arguing that the bill aimed to protect trans youth and their parents. However, the bill’s definition of “abused trans kids” includes any child whose parents refuse to affirm their gender identity. This reveals a dangerous agenda to promote sterilization and sexual mutilation of children under the guise of care.
The left will continue its incremental effort to reclassify the rejection of trans ideology as child abuse, paving the way for ideological jurisprudence and leaving parents mired in endless litigation intended to demoralize and strip them of their most basic rights.
This is not an isolated concept. In California, a bill was proposed that would consider parents unfit if they denied their child’s self-proclaimed gender identity. While the bill was ultimately vetoed, it exposed the belief that parents have no rights when it comes to gender ideology.
Early examples may be dismissed or downplayed, but over time, more parents will lose their children simply because they refuse to embrace a false reality. It is crucial for the sane population to take this issue seriously and fight against it using all available means.
And if all else fails, as Ben Shapiro once said, “When Americans have exhausted every other means to protect their children, when government ignores our pleas, disregards our warnings, and tramples our inherent right to raise our children — we are morally obligated to defend our children and those rights by any means necessary.”
It’s time for deranged tyrants to fear the consequences before they even dare to threaten America’s children.
How does the bill to protect the rights and well-being of transgender children impact the rights of parents to raise their children according to their own beliefs and values?
Would protect the rights and well-being of transgender children. However, opponents of the bill argue that it goes against the rights of parents to raise their children according to their own beliefs and values.
The Coxes’ case highlights the clash between parental rights and the increasing influence of gender ideology. It raises important questions about the role of the state in determining a child’s gender identity and the limits of parental authority.
Supporters of the Coxes argue that parents have the right to raise their children according to their own beliefs, including their understanding of gender identity. They believe that the state should not intervene unless there is evidence of abuse or neglect. They argue that removing a child from their home simply because the parents do not acknowledge their preferred gender identity is a violation of parental rights and an overreach of government power.
On the other hand, proponents of the “gender-affirming” approach argue that it is in the best interest of the child to be raised in an environment that accepts and supports their gender identity. They believe that children should be able to explore their gender identity without fear of rejection or judgment from their parents. They argue that removing a child from a home that does not validate their gender identity is a necessary step to protect the child’s well-being.
This case also raises concerns about the role of medical professionals in determining a child’s gender identity. In the Coxes’ case, it was reported that the teenager had been diagnosed with gender dysphoria, a condition in which a person’s gender identity does not match their assigned sex at birth. The Coxes, however, disagreed with this diagnosis and sought to provide alternative treatment options for their child. This raises questions about the authority of medical professionals and the rights of parents to make decisions about their child’s medical care.
The Supreme Court’s decision in this case will have far-reaching implications for the rights of parents and the role of the state in determining a child’s gender identity. It will also serve as a precedent for future cases involving parental rights and gender identity. The outcome of this case will have a significant impact on the lives of transgender children and their families.
Regardless of the Supreme Court’s decision, it is clear that the issue of gender identity and parental rights is a complex and contentious one. It requires careful consideration of the rights and well-being of both parents and children. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a society that respects the rights and autonomy of individuals while also ensuring the protection and well-being of children.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
