Political powerhouse removed from NFL game for pro-Israel display.
A New Jersey Democratic Insider Considers Legal Action Against Philadelphia Eagles for Pro-Israel Flag Display
A New Jersey Democratic insider is contemplating suing the Philadelphia Eagles after being ejected from a game for proudly showcasing a pro-Israel flag.
George Norcross, a prominent businessman and influential figure in South Jersey, was removed from his private box seating at Philadelphia’s Lincoln Financial Field during the team’s game against the Dallas Cowboys. A video capturing the incident shows Norcross engaged in a heated argument with a security guard before being escorted away.
The security guard confiscated Norcross’s American-Israeli flag from the stadium box.
New Jersey power broker George Norcross was removed from the Philadelphia Eagles game for displaying an Israel/American flag in his box. pic.twitter.com/h1IuvyI6Nk
— Katie Daviscourt (@KatieDaviscourt) November 6, 2023
In a statement, Norcross, the brother of Democratic U.S. Rep. Donald Norcross of New Jersey, claimed that he had been assaulted by the security guard. According to the New Jersey Globe, an online political news outlet in the Garden State, Norcross stated, “Yesterday, I was forcibly removed and assaulted by the non-police security staff of Lincoln Financial Field and the Eagles/NFL for refusing to remove a 3’x5′ American and Israeli flag I’d hung off the box I was sitting in.”
In a team statement, the Eagles alleged that Norcross was ejected because he “became physically and verbally abusive” towards stadium security after being asked to remove the flag.
However, Norcross maintains that 15 witnesses in his private box can attest to his behavior prior to the ejection. He stated, “The only abuse at all is when the Eagles/NFL security force assaulted me and arm locked me behind my back.”
Here’s a statement from George Norcross: https://t.co/vf1uGf8Ec4 pic.twitter.com/bIatzmO0yf
— Crossing Broad (@CrossingBroad) November 6, 2023
Norcross, a passionate fan and season ticket holder, emphasized his support for Israel and compared the Eagles’ stance on civil justice issues and world conflicts. He urged other supporters of Israel to voice their discontent with the team, drawing attention to the ongoing war between Israel and the terrorist group Hamas. Norcross cited examples of donors withholding support from universities due to their behavior following the Hamas attack.
The team justified Norcross’s ejection by referring to franchise rules prohibiting the display of non-game-related banners at games.
Norcross is encouraging supporters of Israel to express their dissatisfaction with the team, just as they have done with universities like Penn and Harvard. He is contemplating legal action against the Philadelphia Eagles, the NFL, and the security company responsible for his removal.
function ffp_getCookie(cname) {
var name=cname + “=”;
var decodedCookie=decodeURIComponent(document.cookie);
var ca=decodedCookie.split(‘;’);
for(var i=0; i
Former New Jersey governor and presidential contender Chris Christie also faced boos at the game, as reported by the Asbury Park Press.
Christie, known for being a former New Jersey governor and a fan of the Dallas Cowboys, a long-standing rival of the Eagles in the NFC East, experienced the crowd’s disapproval.
In addition to the boos, Christie likely felt disappointed with the game’s outcome as the Eagles emerged victorious with a 28-23 win.
The post Political Powerhouse ‘Forcibly Removed’ from NFL Game Over His Pro-Israel Display appeared first on The Western Journal.
What are the arguments of Norcross’ supporters regarding his ejection and the alleged bias against Israel by the Eagles?
L>No
This incident highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the intersection of sports, politics, and social issues. While some argue that sports should remain neutral and focus solely on the game, others see the platform as an opportunity to raise awareness and advocate for causes they believe in.
Supporters of Norcross argue that his ejection was a violation of his freedom of expression and a reflection of the Eagles’ alleged bias against Israel. They believe that Norcross should not have been ejected for proudly displaying a flag that represents his beliefs and support for a country.
On the other hand, critics argue that the team was within its rights to enforce its rules regarding non-game-related displays. They argue that the stadium has the authority to remove any disruptive or potentially offensive displays, regardless of the cause they represent.
Whether Norcross decides to pursue legal action or not, this incident serves as a reminder of the complex relationship between sports and politics. It raises questions about the limits of freedom of expression in sports arenas and the responsibilities of sports teams to remain impartial.
As the debate continues, it is important to consider the implications of actions taken by sports teams and fans alike. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future incidents involving the display of political symbols and flags in sports arenas across the country.
In the meantime, supporters of Israel and Norcross can continue to voice their discontent with the Philadelphia Eagles through public statements, social media campaigns, and other forms of peaceful protest. These actions can help shed light on the issue and create a platform for productive discussions and potential resolutions.
Regardless of the outcome, it is clear that the incident involving George Norcross and the Philadelphia Eagles has sparked a broader debate about the role of politics and expression in the world of sports.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
