Personal attacks, Israel, and terrorism define Michigan’s caustic Senate debate

During Thursday night’s Michigan Senate debate between Abdul el Sayed and Mike Rogers, the candidates engaged in heated exchanges, trading personal insults and disagreements. Thay debated issues such as surveillance technology, immigration enforcement, healthcare, gas prices, and U.S. Middle East policy, but failed to reach any policy agreements. The intensity of their exchanges was so persistent that the debate moderator remarked it was unusual to see such frequent back-and-forth even during commercial breaks.


The attacks in Thursday night’s general election debate between Michigan Senate candidates Abdul el Sayed and Mike Rogers began with the very first question, with the candidates trading personal insults and clashing over surveillance technology, immigration enforcement, healthcare, gas prices, and U.S. policy in the Middle East while producing no policy agreements.

The barbs were unrelenting, such that, at one point, upon returning from a commercial break, the moderator said “that in 30 years of doing debates, I’ve never seen it continue during the commercial, but it did.”

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker