Oregon Activists Gather Enough Signatures for Ballot Measure That Could Ban Hunting, Fishing

Conservative News DailyMay 27, 2026

Activists in Oregon have submitted enough signatures to place Initiative petition 28 (“People for the Elimination of Animal Cruelty Exemptions”/PEACE Act) on the November ballot. The measure, if approved, would prohibit hunting, fishing, and other practices used to obtain food, and it would broaden how certain animal-abuse actions are defined-potentially classifying causing an animal’s death as abuse in the first degree. Oregon’s secretary of State must still verify the signatures.

After the news broke on social media (especially X), many users expressed concerns about economic impacts, especially for coastal and farming communities, and argued the proposal could harm industries such as fishing, ranching, and pest control. Others framed the hunting ban as indirectly related to gun-rights/Second Amendment debates. Some commenters also criticized what they saw as inconsistencies in how the activists approach protections for animals versus legal treatment of abortion.

Part of the Pacific Northwest could soon see its forests, lakes, and rivers effectively closed off to human activity.

According to KATU-TV in Salem, Oregon, activists have gathered enough signatures to get Initiative Petition 28 onto the state’s November ballot.

That petition, if adopted by voters, would make hunting, fishing, and other food-procuring practices illegal.

In fact, the petitioners secured the requisite 117,173 signatures over a two-year period by presenting the petition under the following title:

“Criminalizes breeding practices, injuring/killing animals, including for food, hunting, fishing. Creating transition fund. Exceptions.”

For instance, under Section 4 of the People for the Elimination of Animal Cruelty Exemptions (PEACE) Act, Oregon voters could redefine animal abuse in the first degree to mean activity that “[c]auses the death of an animal.”

The Oregon Secretary of State’s Office still must verify the signatures, according to KATU.

Meanwhile, on the social media platform X, users reacted with alarm. Some focused on the economic consequences.

If you were smart @KATUNews you would do the deep dive into the ramifications for the entire state.

No more fishing or crabbing on the Oregon coast. Would destroy those coastal communities.

Dairy farmers and Tillamook Cheese and Ice Cream? Gone.

Cattle ranching in Eastern…

— WebGirlHere 🍊🦆 (@WebgirlHere) May 26, 2026

Other X users viewed the hunting prohibition in particular as a back-door assault on the Second Amendment.

Assault weapon bans usually leave exemptions for hunting rifles.

The long game here?

Ban hunting and there’s no “need” for those either.

The government will go to any length necessary to disarm you.

— Rusty Shackleford 🟧 (@RKBAShackleford) May 26, 2026

It would also ban pest control. This is just a misleading, manipulative way that Leftists are trying to take individual’s power away in preparation for a communist takeover. You think I am being extreme and ridiculous, but it’s 100% the long game. Pun intended.

— Téa – the Empirical Armadillo (@empirical_Tea) May 26, 2026

As for the attempted prohibition on fishing, it is worth noting that Jesus fed the five thousand with only five loaves of bread and two fish. (e.g. Matthew 14:13-21)

Finally, at least one X user noted a discrepancy in the way the activists would treat animals and people.

“Protect the salmon and murder the unborn children. Sounds about right for Oregon,” the user wrote.