Of Course: Woke Biologists Claim Wild Animals Are Suffering From the Effects of Systemic Racism

The Left’s most brilliant and diabolically clever idea to promote its Marxist agenda is the “The Left’s Marxist Agenda” “systemic racism.” Systemic racism is everywhere, nowhere. It doesn’t need any evidence of actual discrimination to support its case. If it is followed to its conclusion, it will result in an infinite number of wealth confiscation, redistribution, and other schemes. It’s so useful that “experts” You will find it in more and better places. The absurdity of their claims is not a barometer for how low they’ll go. Their target audience is Leftists who are used to hearing absurd claims on an industrial level. And so the latest claim, that even wild animals are suffering from the effects of this all-pervasive malady, was just another day for the Left’s propaganda mill.

The UK’s Daily Mail reported Saturday “scientists” — that is, the infallible high priests of the Left’s secular religion, never to be questioned or regarded with the slightest degree of skepticism — “claim that there are fewer wild animals in neighborhoods where mostly people of color live – and their absence is affecting residents’ mental health.” Violence among racial minorities? It was because there weren’t squirrels, Your Honour.

It appears that “a research study that looked into the genetic diversity of wildlife in neighborhoods across the United States found government rules that previously mandated separated neighborhoods based on race, is still having lingering after-effects on where animals choose to live decades on.” Unavoidably, “the study suggests that areas where mostly white people live have a greater diversity when it come to animals living in the area.”

This pseudo-intellectual rubbish actually was published in Proceedings of National Academy of SciencesThe following is a list of the Daily Mail This tells us that a “peer-reviewed scientific journal,” An acronym that used to mean something. However, it now means that woke faculty members examined the work and found it acceptable ideologically and then slapped the authors.

It is absurd, but it shouldn’t be taken lightly. According to the study, “the practice of redlining essentially drove out woodland creatures from minority neighborhoods leading to negative effects on the mental and physical well-being of minority residents.” Redlining was a practice. “most commonly used in the 20th century and was based on racial and ethnic discrimination,” Get involved “financial institutions, insurance companies, and other businesses” Drawing “lines on a map to define areas where they will or will not provide services, such as mortgages, insurance, or loans.” This kind of thing is illegal since 1968 when the Fair Housing Act was adopted. However, Leftist academics have a clear goal. They claim that wildlife and minorities are still suffering the consequences of discrimination. This goal is radical and requires forcible resettlement. “equity.”

Inconceivable? Hardly. This is a story about wildlife that has suffered the effects of “systemic racism” coalesces neatly with the Left’s handwringing about racist trees. Remember that Kamala, the alleged Vice President, was murdered in November 2021. It was at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, where she interrupted a presentation to ask if NASA could “measure trees” The cause of “environmental justice.”

Video Shown Discussing NASA by the NASA presenter “climate adaptation strategies” Harris interrupts Harris to ask the question. “Can you, can you measure, um, trees?” The presenter answered “Yes!,” Harris and Harris continued their work: “‘Cause part of that data that you are referring to, and it’s in EJ, environmental justice — that you can also track by race their averages in terms of the number of trees in the neighborhood where people live.”

Related: Another Day, Another CNN Discovery about Racism

Harris was thinking of Harris “tree equity,” the idea that minority communities suffer disproportionately from global warming because they generally live in urban areas that get even hotter than the rest of the country does as the internal combustion engines keep eating away at our protection from the sun’s rays, because there is a relative lack of trees compared to the rich, white suburbs. You can either plant many trees in urban areas, or force the poor to move into more wealthy areas.

Old Joe Biden’s Build Back Better agenda actually Spends $3 billion You can have your money and mine. “tree equity,” It turns out that, according to Tree Equity Score WebsiteTrees are “critical infrastructure that every person in every neighborhood deserves.” In fact, like so many other things these days, they’re “a basic right that we must secure.” However, trees are being distributed in a discriminatory manner at the moment: “But a map of tree cover in America’s cities is too often a map of income and race. That’s because trees often are sparse in low-income neighborhoods and some neighborhoods of color. Ensuring equitable tree cover across every neighborhood can help address social inequities so that all people can thrive.”

The Communists forced the wealthy to leave their homes in order to make them available for The People. You would think that such a thing could never happen in America. All the talk about how to eradicate “systemic racism,” It would be foolish not to be too confident.