NYT Columnist: ‘War on Inflation Over’ – Unless You Ignore Essential Necessities
NYT Columnist Says ‘War on Inflation Is Over’ – if You Exclude Everything People Need to Live
America’s credentialed class continues to beclown itself.
On Thursday, New York Times columnist and (drum roll, please) Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman posted an absurd “Mission Accomplished”-style declaration of victory over rising prices.
“The war on inflation is over. We won, at very little cost,” Krugman said on the X social media platform.
His accompanying graph, however, told a different story.
Krugman’s graph had the following title: “CPI ex food, energy, shelter and used cars.”
In other words, he declared victory over inflation based on a graph of the consumer price index that excluded those four items, at least three of which qualify as basic human necessities.
The war on inflation is over. We won, at very little cost pic.twitter.com/opumf3nEvL
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) October 12, 2023
Understandably, Krugman’s post received “added context” via X’s “Community Notes” feature.
“The exclusion of food, shelter, energy, and used cars is misleading. All prices included in CPI shows year over year inflation at 3.7% as of September 2023,” the note read.
Krugman suffered additional chastisement and some well-earned mockery from a number of prominent conservative accounts.
“This is fantastic news for all Americans who don’t need food, a place to live, or fuel & electricity. (Note the subtitle on Krugman’s chart),” Washington Times columnist and former Trump 2020 communications director Tim Murtaugh posted.
This is fantastic news for all Americans who don’t need food, a place to live, or fuel & electricity.
(Note the subtitle on Krugman’s chart)
— Tim Murtaugh (@TimMurtaugh) October 12, 2023
Unusual Whales, a financial site with 1.4M followers on X, blasted Krugman for obvious intent to deceive.
“You excluded everything people needed to live. Come on, Paul,” it said.
You excluded everything people needed to live.
Come on, Paul.
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) October 12, 2023
Not the Bee, the nonsatirical sister site of the Babylon Bee, advised Krugman on how to follow best practices for deception.
“Dude if you’re going to cook your numbers at least put it as a footnote instead of in the title of the graph,” it said.
Dude if you’re going to cook your numbers at least put it as a footnote instead of in the title of the graph
— Not the Bee (@Not_the_Bee) October 12, 2023
Former California congressional candidate David Giglio thought Krugman’s own account might be a parody.
“Ahahahahahahaha this can’t be a serious post. Literally excluded the 3 most important things,” Giglio posted.
Ahahahahahahaha this can’t be a serious post. Literally excluded the 3 most important things.
— David Giglio (@DavidGiglioCA) October 12, 2023
Another user took a shot at Krugman’s credentials and suggested other motives, saying, “Paul Krugman is NOT an economist. He is an unabashed propagandist for the Biden regime.”
Paul Krugman is NOT an economist. He is an unabashed propagandist for the Biden regime.
— Shawn Quinn (@ShawnQuinn83) October 12, 2023
Apparently, the criticism made Krugman think twice about staking his credibility on a deceptive graph.
“I was too flip here. I’ve been using this particular measure for a while, so want to be consistent. But it has flaws (medical insurance too optimistic). But almost every measure now <3 percent. 1/,” Krugman posted a day later.
I was too flip here. I’ve been using this particular measure for a while, so want to be consistent. But it has flaws (medical insurance too optimistic). But almost every measure now <3 percent. 1/ https://t.co/fNN1dM42JC
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) October 13, 2023
“Too flip” does not describe the real problem with Krugman’s original post.
For one thing, the economist betrayed a ruling-class elitism with which Americans have grown too familiar. No one who has endured financial hardship would ever dream of claiming victory over inflation while excluding basic necessities. That showed a lack of self-awareness that only comes with true privilege.
Second, Krugman clearly intended to deceive anyone who saw his graph. He wanted people to believe that it told a positive story when in fact it told the opposite.
The graph’s headline should have produced something like the following explanation: “If you have disposable income, things look better for you than they once did. But if you happen to be poor, things keep getting worse.”
Krugman, however, did not explain his graph’s true meaning. He even left “ex” as a shortened version of “excluding,” which made it seem that he intended the exclusion of necessities to pass unnoticed. He knew, of course, that the latter term would not convey the propaganda he intended.
Perhaps worst of all, Americans no longer trust so-called experts like Krugman.
The saddest thing about this development is that most Americans want to believe the people whom their institutions represent to them as authorities. Americans want to believe those authorities because, above all, they want to believe in merit.
Indeed, Americans would not have spent the last two centuries building colleges and universities if they did not venerate knowledge.
Krugman and too many other experts, however, lack honesty and humility, rendering their credentials meaningless.
Small wonder that so many Americans have stopped believing them.
A Note from Our Founder:
Every morning, we at The Western Journal wake up and pursue our mission of giving you the important information you need about what’s happening in America.
We can’t do that without your help.
America has been on the receiving end of false narratives. The purpose of these false narratives is to make you feel powerless. The Western Journal empowers you by breaking these false narratives.
But I wouldn’t be honest with you today if I didn’t let you know that the future of The Western Journal is in jeopardy without your help.
Silicon Valley and the Big Tech tyrants have done everything they can to put The Western Journal out of business. Our faithful donors and subscribers have kept us going.
If you’ve never chosen to donate, let me be honest: We need your help today.
Please don’t wait one minute. Donate right now – our situation in America is dire. Our country hangs by a thread, and The Western Journal stands for truth in this difficult time.
Please stand with us by donating today.
Floyd G. Brown
Founder of The Western Journal
The post NYT Columnist Says ‘War on Inflation Is Over’ – if You Exclude Everything People Need to Live appeared first on The Western Journal.
Does Krugman’s tweet about inflation exclude essential items like food, shelter, energy, and used cars, making it a self-parody?
Parodying itself with the tweet.
“Is this a self-parody? Did you not just exclude food, shelter, energy, and used cars?” Giglio asked.
Is this a self-parody? Did you not just exclude food, shelter, energy, and used cars?
— David Giglio (@GiglioForCA) October 12, 2023
These responses highlight the absurdity of Krugman’s declaration of victory and the blatant attempt to manipulate data to fit a narrative. By excluding essential items that people need to live, Krugman conveniently ignores the real impact of rising prices on everyday Americans.
Inflation is a serious issue that affects all aspects of society. When prices rise, people’s purchasing power decreases, making it more difficult to afford basic necessities. Food, shelter, and energy are fundamental requirements for survival, and their exclusion in Krugman’s graph distorts the reality of the situation.
While it may be true that certain segments of the economy are experiencing lower rates of inflation, it is irresponsible and misleading to claim victory over inflation as a whole. Ignoring the rising prices of essential goods and services only serves to undermine the experiences of those who are struggling to make ends meet.
It is important for economists and journalists to provide accurate and comprehensive information to the public. Manipulating data and cherry-picking statistics only erodes trust in the media and further divides society. As consumers and citizens, we must demand transparency and honesty from those who report on economic issues.
Rising inflation is a complex issue that requires careful analysis and thoughtful solutions. It cannot be dismissed or minimized by excluding key components of the consumer price index. The impact of inflation on people’s lives is real, and it is essential that we address it honestly and effectively.
Instead of celebrating a premature victory, economists like Krugman should focus on understanding the root causes of inflation and proposing viable solutions. Only through a comprehensive and nuanced approach can we effectively tackle this economic challenge and ensure the well-being of all Americans.
As consumers and citizens, it is crucial that we remain vigilant and critical of the information presented to us. We must demand accountability and accuracy from those in positions of influence, especially when it comes to economic matters that directly impact our lives.
The war on inflation is far from over, and it is only by acknowledging the full reality of the situation that we can begin to address it effectively. Let us not be swayed by misleading graphs and empty declarations of victory, but instead strive for a more informed and equitable future for all.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
