NC court blocks law stripping governor’s election board appointment power
Judges Grant Preliminary Injunction Blocking Law on Election Board Appointments
A panel of judges on the North Carolina Superior Court has taken a stand against a controversial law that aims to change the process of appointing election boards in the state. The law, pushed through by GOP supermajorities in the state legislature, would give the legislature the power to select board members instead of the governor. However, the court ruled in favor of a preliminary injunction, effectively halting the implementation of the law.
Governor Cooper Celebrates Court’s Decision
North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper, who had his veto of the law overridden, expressed his satisfaction with the court’s ruling. In a tweet on Thursday, he emphasized the importance of fair and secure elections and highlighted the court’s consistent findings that partisan attempts to control the State Board of Elections are unconstitutional.
The law aims to change the composition of the board, shifting from five governor appointees, with three from the governor’s party, to eight members appointed by the legislature based on recommendations from top party officials. This new formula would likely result in an equal split between Republicans and Democrats. However, a spokesperson for Republican state Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger, who was named in the lawsuit, argued that Governor Cooper’s lawsuit was an attempt to maintain Democratic control of the board rather than fostering bipartisan representation.
North Carolina is expected to play a crucial role as a swing state in the upcoming presidential election, with the governorship also up for grabs in 2024. As Governor Cooper is term-limited, the race between the GOP and Democrats for the governorship is anticipated to be fiercely competitive.
Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.
What was the controversial law that the North Carolina Superior Court granted a preliminary injunction against?
Judges on the North Carolina Superior Court have made a significant decision by granting a preliminary injunction against a controversial law that seeks to change the process of appointing election boards in the state. This law, which was pushed through by GOP supermajorities in the state legislature, would grant the legislature the power to select board members instead of the governor. However, the court ruling has effectively halted the implementation of this law.
North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper, who had his veto of the law overridden, expressed his satisfaction with the court’s decision. In a tweet on Thursday, he emphasized the importance of fair and secure elections and highlighted the consistent findings of the court that partisan attempts to control the State Board of Elections are unconstitutional.
The law intends to alter the composition of the board, transitioning from five governor-appointed members, with three from the governor’s party, to eight members appointed by the legislature based on recommendations from top party officials. This new formula would likely lead to an equal split between Republicans and Democrats. However, a spokesperson for Republican state Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger, who was named in the lawsuit, argued that Governor Cooper’s lawsuit was an attempt to maintain Democratic control of the board instead of fostering bipartisan representation.
North Carolina is expected to play a crucial role as a swing state in the upcoming presidential election, with the governorship also up for grabs in 2024. As Governor Cooper is term-limited, the race between the GOP and Democrats for the governorship is anticipated to be fiercely competitive.
This decision by the North Carolina Superior Court panel of judges showcases the checks and balances at play in a democratic system. It reflects the importance of upholding fair and transparent electoral processes, free from partisan manipulation. The outcome of this case sets a precedent for maintaining the integrity of election boards and ensuring that they represent the will of the people.
As the legal battle continues, it will be interesting to see how the law evolves and the impact it may have on the political landscape of North Carolina. This case serves as a reminder that the independence and impartiality of election boards are essential in safeguarding the democratic values that underpin any electoral system. It also emphasizes the need for continued vigilance in ensuring that partisan interests do not overpower the fundamental principles of fairness and democratic representation in the electoral process.
For more detailed information on this topic, you can read the full article from The Washington Examiner by clicking here.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Auto Amazon Links: Could not resolve the given unit type, . Please be sure to update the auto-insert definition if you have deleted the unit.