New York Times Writer’s Take On The Alex Murdaugh Murders Is The Reason Why Liberals Can’t Be Trusted On Crime
Last week saw two great events in America: Lori Lightfoot, Democrat of Chicago, lost her bid to reelect Lori Lightfoot and Alex Murdaugh (sweaty South Carolina dynasty attorney) was convicted for murder. Both of these are signs that America isn’t ready yet to be a nation. lawless war zone.
Lightfoot came in third place among the city’s residents, likely because her voters chose public safety. top concern Lightfoot was the one to oversee Chicago’s most tragic year. in a quarter century. Murdaugh was found guilty by a jury of murdering his wife and son.
As always, don’t get too comfortable. Lightfoot was still able to receive nearly 20 percent Some people would find a reason for Murdaugh to be exonerated if they could have voted. Farhad Manjoo from The New York Times is an example of such a person.
Manjoo is an example of the people you will find in the Democratic Party or the national media. He can make the most basic issue seem complicated when it comes down to police and law enforcement. The police force is not representative of ethnicity in the community. However, we must reallocate resources for social services. Even though it is quite damning evidence, I still have questions.
All this is to say that law and Order seems like an abstract concept, which requires less criminal policing and takes more time. Take a look at these ideasMore studiesMore committeesMore councils.
Manjoo received the verdict of the jury on Murdaugh’s case last week. wrote He “worries” Jurors weren’t “cautious” When examining the evidence, a lot of it relied upon geolocation data from smartphones.
“I have little quarrel with [the jury’s] decision, but the lightning speed with which it came to its conclusion — about three hours — makes me deeply uncomfortable with how the criminal justice system might deal with all of the digital effluvia being spewed by our devices,” He said. “Unlike the jury, apparently, I worry that the evidence our devices produce can just as easily muddy the picture of a crime as clarify it.”
Although I am thrilled that Manjoo did not say anything, it is a disappointment. equity — Murdaugh was a wealthy white man, even without the stealing — he still exhibits the same tendency of law enforcement-stupid liberals who can find any reason It is not right to question the American legal system. Manjoo’s case is that it may be possible that innocent explanations were offered for why the phone records of the Murdaughs matched the state’s theory that Alex murdered his victims and returned to the scene, where he claimed to have found the bodies.
“There were no witnesses, and the police found little forensic evidence to tie Murdaugh to the crime,” continued detective Manjoo. “They did not recover any murder weapons or any blood-soaked clothing; and because the murders occurred on Murdaugh’s property and he touched the bodies when he discovered them (he says he felt Paul for a pulse and touched Maggie on her waist), the evidence of his DNA found at the scene proves little.”
Although the trial was not a game, it did end. “Clue.” The murder scene was not covered by the weapon procured by the prosecution. And the suggested motive — that Murdaugh committed the crimes as a Hail Mary in hopes of evading scrutiny over his financial wrongdoings — is less than satisfying. But the state had something better to work with — a murderer who admitted to the one thing that a murderer can’t admit if his hope is to get away with murder.
Murdaugh told everyone, including the police, up to the moment he took the stand to give evidence that he wasn’t at home during the period leading to the shooting deaths of his son and wife. It was only when he was confronted with irrefutable proof — a video recording by his son that featured Murdaugh’s voice in the background — that he finally admitted yes, he was there, perhaps within as little as five minutes before the murders.
A reasonable juror would be able to look at the counter-evidence that Murdaugh was in Japan, and still vote for his conviction.
Manjoo and other liberals are not necessarily evil. However, they love to show how intelligent they really are by asking questions that confuse otherwise easy-solved problems.
Jurors with reasonable standards: He lied to family and friends about his location at the time of the crime and then admitted that he did it when it was impossible to lie anymore. Guilty.
Manjoo: But it gets more complex than that. Imagine he had lied to his GPS location and that his geolocation data from his phone was wrong by 50 feet. It’s tricky technology, and I don’t like that hole in my case. Going to have to get out.
Manjoo must be kept away from criminal policy, it is clear.
“The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author of the article and not necessarily shared or endorsed by Conservative News Daily”
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
