New law restricts school boards, hampers local control, disrupts district functions: Education leaders concerned.
California Law Bans Exclusion of Books on Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
Education leaders are raising concerns about a new law signed by California Gov. Gavin Newsom that prohibits school boards from excluding books that cover topics related to race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation. Critics argue that this law takes away local control from communities and adds complexity and costs to the work of local school districts.
The law, known as Assembly Bill 1078, not only requires a two-thirds vote by a school board to exclude a book for any other reason, but also mandates audits of library and classroom books. School districts that do not meet the California Department of Education’s standards for diverse instructional materials may face fines.
Opponents of the law, such as Lance Christensen from the California Policy Center, believe it undermines local decision-making and burdens school administrators and the state Department of Education with confusing logistics and increased workloads. They also argue that districts will have to allocate more funds to ensure compliance with the new policy.
Related Stories
- Newsom Signs Law Prohibiting California Schools From Banning Books With ‘Inclusive and Diverse Perspectives’ - Published on 9/26/2023
- Southern California School Board Approves Curriculum After Gov. Gavin Newsom Threatened $1.5 Million Fine – Published on 7/23/2023
According to Christensen, the bill’s requirements will force school administrators to spend more time reviewing curriculum materials or hire additional staff to ensure compliance. The California School Board Association, which also opposed the law, expressed concerns about the potential for complaints, investigations, and enforcement actions at multiple levels.
Gavin Newsom and Assemblyman Dr. Corey Jackson, the bill’s author, have cited instances where local governing boards rejected books that included critical race theory and gender ideology as reasons for implementing this law.
Several Southern California school boards, including the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified and Temecula Valley Unified, had previously banned the teaching of critical race theory. Joseph Komrosky, President of the Temecula Valley school board, believes that Assembly Bill 1078 takes away power from local communities and exposes corruption among state politicians.
While no lawsuits are planned against the new law, both Komrosky and Christensen anticipate that legislators will pass another bill next year to clarify and streamline the processes outlined in Assembly Bill 1078.
Despite the concerns raised, Christensen hopes that this law will prompt parents to take a more active role in their children’s education and make their own decisions regarding curriculum and textbooks.
What are the arguments made by supporters of the California law regarding the importance of diverse perspectives and experiences in education?
“>Newsom Signs Law Prohibiting California Schools from Banning Books with Inclusive and Diverse Perspectives”
Supporters of the legislation argue that it is essential for students to have access to diverse perspectives and experiences, as it promotes inclusivity and provides a more comprehensive education. They argue that the inclusion of books discussing race, gender, and sexual orientation helps students develop critical thinking skills and a broader understanding of the world they live in. In a statement, Gov. Newsom said, “I hear from students every day, and they tell me how important it is to learn about different cultures, histories, and experiences. This law ensures that our classrooms remain inclusive spaces where all students feel seen and valued.” The law comes in response to instances where books covering topics related to race, gender, and sexual orientation have been banned or restricted in some school districts. Critics have argued that these bans stifle free speech, limit academic freedom, and perpetuate harmful stereotypes. California is not the first state to pass such legislation. Illinois, New Jersey, and Oregon have also enacted similar laws to ensure that students have access to a wide variety of books and ideas. However, opponents worry that this law infringes on parents’ rights to determine what is appropriate for their children to learn. They argue that parents should have the final say on what materials are taught in schools and that the government should not interfere with that decision. Additionally, critics claim that the law places an undue burden on school districts. They argue that the requirement for a two-thirds vote to exclude a book, as well as the mandated audits of library and classroom books, creates additional administrative work and costs for already overburdened districts. The new law also raises concerns about potential conflicts and controversies that may arise regarding specific books or topics. School administrators may face difficult decisions in balancing the desire for inclusivity and respect for different perspectives with the need to ensure appropriate content for all students. Only time will tell the long-term effects of this legislation. As schools navigate the implementation of this law, it will be essential to address concerns from both sides and find a balance that respects the rights of parents while encouraging inclusivity and diversity in education. In the end, the intention behind Assembly Bill 1078 is laudable – to foster an inclusive educational environment that values the diverse experiences and voices of all students. However, the tension between inclusivity and parental rights will continue to be a challenge as communities grapple with the implementation of this law and its impact on education.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
