NJ considers limits on underage social media use
New Jersey Considers Proposal to Protect Children on Social Media
New Jersey lawmakers are currently discussing a proposal that aims to safeguard children on social media platforms. Under the proposed regulations, children under the age of 18 would need their parents’ consent before signing up for popular sites like Facebook, TikTok, and Instagram. Additionally, the proposal would prohibit instant messaging between minors and adults.
In order to obtain parental consent, the parents or guardians would be required to provide government-issued identification and credit card information to the social media company. A small fee of 35 cents would also be charged to process the request. Social media companies that violate these regulations could face fines of up to $2,500 per violation.
Assemblyman Herb Conaway, the bill’s sponsor, believes that these restrictions are necessary to protect children from the potential dangers of social media and to hold companies accountable for their actions. He stated, “Unfortunately, far too many people in the business of selling things are perfectly willing to engage in behavior and practices that cause a lot of harm if it means they’re going to make a lot of money. And that’s where government has to step in and say that we have a responsibility to protect the public.”
Growing Concerns and Similar Legislation
Concerns about the impact of social media on young people’s mental health have been on the rise, leading to increased scrutiny of platforms like TikTok and Instagram. Tech giants have faced criticism for issues such as user privacy, the spread of hate speech, and misinformation.
Congress recently held hearings where social media executives were questioned about their efforts to combat online child sexual exploitation. Utah became the first state to pass a law requiring parental consent for children under 16 to access social media, and other states like Texas, Ohio, and Louisiana have introduced similar proposals.
Last year, California approved a law that prohibits tech companies from profiling children or using their personal information in ways that could harm them physically or mentally.
While federal law already prohibits social media companies from collecting data on children under 13 without parental consent, critics argue that minors often find ways to bypass these restrictions.
Controversy and Opposition
The New Jersey proposal has faced opposition from liberal advocacy groups like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), who argue that it could be unconstitutional and infringe on individuals’ First Amendment rights online. Planned Parenthood and Garden State Equality have also launched a campaign against the legislation, claiming that it would deprive LGBTQ children of important information and mental health support.
Last year, Governor Phil Murphy signed a bill establishing a commission to study the effects of social media usage on adolescents both in and out of school.
What are some possible challenges and objections to the proposed legislation to regulate social media for children?
Petuating the myth that social media platforms are safe for children. The reality is that these platforms can expose children to inappropriate content, online predators, and cyberbullying.”
According to recent studies, the majority of children and teenagers in the United States are active users of social media platforms. They can easily access these platforms without any real barriers, leaving them vulnerable to various dangers. The proposed legislation intends to bridge this gap by placing responsibility on both parents and social media companies.
Critics of the proposal argue that it infringes on the rights of parents and could potentially pose bureaucratic challenges. They believe that it is ultimately the responsibility of parents to monitor and guide their children’s online activities. However, proponents argue that parental supervision alone is not enough, as social media platforms have sophisticated algorithms that can bypass parental controls.
In recent years, there have been numerous cases of cyberbullying resulting in severe consequences for the victims. Online predators have also taken advantage of social media platforms to exploit vulnerable children. The proposal aims to address these issues by requiring social media companies to implement stricter age verification protocols and monitoring measures.
While some may argue that these measures are excessive, similar regulations already exist for various industries, such as online gambling and purchasing age-restricted products. The proposal seeks to extend this concept to social media, recognizing the potential harm it can cause to young and impressionable minds.
Furthermore, the financial aspect of the proposal provides an additional layer of accountability for social media companies. By requiring a small fee and government-issued identification, it ensures that parents are actively involved in their children’s social media activities. This measure aims to discourage underage users from accessing age-restricted platforms and serves as a deterrent for companies that may overlook age verification protocols.
It is important to note that the proposal does not intend to ban or restrict social media for children entirely. Instead, it aims to establish a safer environment for children to navigate the complex online world. Parents will still have the authority to grant consent, and social media companies can continue to operate while implementing stricter measures to protect young users.
Ultimately, the proposed regulations in New Jersey reflect the growing concern over the impact of social media on child safety. By placing responsibility on both parents and social media companies, the legislation seeks to strike a balance between protecting children and preserving individual liberties. As the discussions continue, it remains to be seen how this proposal will shape the landscape of social media for young users not just in New Jersey, but potentially across the nation.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
