Democrats increasingly willing to attach conditions to aid for Israel
A Growing Number of Democrats Push for Conditions on Aid to Israel
A growing number of Democrats in the House and the Senate are voicing their openness to placing conditions on future aid to Israel with the goal of reducing civilian casualties in Gaza following Hamas’s recent attack on Israeli civilians. This shift has created a divide among Democrats over the war in Gaza, as lawmakers face mounting pressure from liberal constituents and pro-Palestinian activists to address the humanitarian crisis.
President Joe Biden has called for an additional $14.3 billion in aid for Israel, on top of the usual $3.8 billion the United States provides annually. However, some Democrats are now advocating for conditioning funding for Israel on its government taking steps to stop the fighting. Senate Democrats plan to discuss this idea further at their weekly lunch on Tuesday.
Democrats Speak Out
Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) expressed his opposition to simply giving $14 billion to Israel without any conditions, stating that it is an issue that needs to be debated. Last week, Sanders and a group of liberals called on Biden and Congress to make annual aid to Israel conditional on an end to the bombing in Gaza and a freeze on settlements in the West Bank.
Biden acknowledged these comments on conditioning aid, describing the proposal as a “worthwhile thought.” However, he emphasized the need for progress and stated that starting off with such conditions may hinder that progress.
Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI) endorsed the idea of including stipulations on money appropriated for Israel, highlighting that other areas receiving U.S. aid have requirements. Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) also expressed support for conditioning aid to allies based on compliance with human rights laws.
Divided Opinions
While some Democrats are advocating for conditions on aid to Israel, others argue that it should be supplied without any conditions. Representative Dan Goldman (D-NY) stated that aid should be provided without conditions, as long as Hamas surrenders and is removed from Gaza.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) emphasized the need for bipartisan cooperation in addressing national security challenges, including aid to Israel, Ukraine, and humanitarian aid for civilians in Gaza and the Indo-Pacific.
The debate over conditioning aid to Israel continues, with Democrats seeking to find a balance between supporting Israel’s defense and addressing concerns about civilian casualties in Gaza.
Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.
What are the arguments made by Democrats advocating for conditioning aid to Israel in light of the ongoing conflict in Gaza?
Ing and protect innocent lives in Gaza. These Democrats argue that providing unconditional aid to Israel, particularly in the midst of the ongoing conflict, overlooks the human rights violations and disproportionate use of force by Israeli security forces.
The recent escalation of violence in Gaza, triggered by Hamas’s rocket attacks and the Israeli military’s response, has resulted in a significant loss of civilian lives and infrastructure damage. According to the Gaza Health Ministry, at least 256 Palestinians, including 66 children, have been killed since the conflict began. On the Israeli side, 12 people, including two children, have lost their lives.
The plight of innocent civilians caught in the crossfire has prompted a shift in the Democratic Party’s stance on aid to Israel. Lawmakers such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Mark Pocan, and Betty McCollum, among others, have expressed their support for conditioning aid to Israel. They argue that the United States should leverage its financial assistance to Israel to ensure the protection of civilian lives and adherence to international humanitarian law.
This growing faction within the Democratic Party has highlighted the need to reevaluate the United States’ longstanding policy of providing unconditional military aid to Israel. They argue that the status quo enables Israel to continue its military campaign without sufficient accountability for its actions.
The idea of conditioning aid to Israel is not new, but it has gained significant traction among Democrats in recent years. In 2019, Representative McCollum introduced the “Promoting Human Rights by Ending Israeli Military Detention of Palestinian Children Act,” which sought to prevent the use of U.S. funds for the Israeli military’s detention and mistreatment of Palestinian children. While the bill did not pass, it showcased a growing sentiment within the Democratic Party to address human rights concerns related to U.S. aid to Israel.
Critics of conditioning aid argue that it risks undermining the longstanding alliance between the United States and Israel and may embolden Israel’s adversaries in the region. They contend that aid to Israel serves as a vital strategic asset for both countries, fostering stability and promoting American interests in the Middle East. Moreover, they assert that conditioning aid puts an unfair burden on Israel, potentially hindering their ability to defend themselves and maintain their security in a volatile region.
Despite the divide within the Democratic Party, the push for conditioning aid to Israel reflects a broader shift in public opinion. A recent poll conducted by Data for Progress found that 34% of likely Democratic primary voters supported conditioning U.S. aid to Israel to prevent human rights violations. This represents a significant increase from previous years and suggests that the issue is gaining traction among the party’s base.
While it remains to be seen whether conditioning aid to Israel will become a mainstream position within the Democratic Party, the current debate signifies a growing recognition of the need to address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and hold all parties accountable for their actions. It highlights the delicate balance between maintaining a strong U.S.-Israel relationship while also advocating for human rights and the protection of innocent lives. As the conflict continues, the Democratic Party will likely face increasing pressure to take a more nuanced approach to aid allocation, considering the impact it has on the ground and the possibility of incentivizing positive changes in Israeli policy.
In conclusion, the growing number of Democrats advocating for conditions on aid to Israel reflects a changing landscape within the Democratic Party. This shift reflects a desire to address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and hold all parties accountable for their actions. The debate over conditioning aid highlights the delicate balance between maintaining a strong U.S.-Israel relationship and advocating for human rights. As the conflict and public opinion evolve, Democrats will face the challenge of finding a nuanced approach to aid allocation that promotes peace, stability, and justice in the region.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
