Mick Jagger: Kids don’t need $500M, may donate to charity.
Rolling Stones Frontman Mick Jagger Hints at Not Leaving Entire Fortune to His Children
In a recent interview, Mick Jagger, the legendary frontman of the Rolling Stones, suggested that he may not be leaving his entire fortune to his eight children. The 80-year-old musician made these comments while discussing the potential sale of the Stones’ post-1971 catalog. When asked about the possibility of a huge sum of cash benefiting his kids, Jagger dismissed the idea, stating, “the children don’t need $500 million to live well. Come on.”
Jagger also expressed his consideration of donating his wealth to charity, emphasizing the potential to make a positive impact on the world. Additionally, he revealed that he has no plans to publish an autobiography.
Reflecting on the changing landscape of music in the technology era, Jagger mentioned the concept of a posthumous business and tour. He acknowledged the advancements in technology, citing ABBA’s recent “Voyage” virtual show as an example. Jagger humorously admitted missing the show, which he was supposed to attend.
Jagger’s Family and Legacy
Jagger’s oldest child is his daughter Karis, 52, whom he shares with Marsha Hunt. He also has a daughter, Jade, 51, with his ex-wife Bianca Jagger.
From his marriage to Jerry Hall, Jagger has four children: daughters Elizabeth, 39, and Georgia May, 31, and sons James, 38, and Gabriel, 25. The couple was married from 1990 to 1997.
Jagger has a son named Lucas, 24, with his model girlfriend Luciana Morad Gimenez. His youngest child is his six-year-old son Deveraux, whom he shares with Melanie Hamrick. Additionally, Jagger is a proud grandfather to five grandchildren and great-grandfather to three.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
Jagger’s Purpose and New Music
In the interview, Jagger also shared how having a young child has given his life purpose, particularly in the present. He expressed gratitude for his supportive family and the joy he finds in being a father to young children, which makes him feel relevant.
The Rolling Stones recently made headlines with the announcement of their first new music in 18 years. Their upcoming album, “Hackney Diamonds,” set to debut on October 20, features an impressive lineup of guest stars, including Elton John, Lady Gaga, Paul McCartney, Stevie Wonder, and Bill Wyman.
What does Mick Jagger’s statement about his children not needing vast amounts of wealth to live well suggest about the concept of inheritance and alternative ways to find happiness and success
Nology that have allowed deceased musicians to continue generating income through holographic performances and other means. However, Jagger made it clear that he does not see himself participating in such endeavors after his passing, stating that he finds it “a bit creepy.”
These comments from Jagger have sparked a discussion about the responsibility of wealthy individuals to distribute their fortunes and the potential impact it can have on society. While it is not uncommon for wealthy individuals to leave their wealth to their children, Jagger’s stance brings attention to the idea of using wealth for philanthropic purposes and making a positive difference in the world.
Jagger’s statement that “the children don’t need $500 million to live well” raises important questions about the concept of inheritance and the role it plays in shaping the lives of heirs. It challenges the notion that accumulating vast wealth is essential for leading a fulfilling life and suggests that there are other ways to find happiness and success.
By considering the option of donating his wealth to charity, Jagger is following in the footsteps of many other wealthy individuals who have committed to using their fortunes for the greater good. Philanthropy has become increasingly significant in today’s society, as billionaires like Warren Buffett and Bill Gates have pledged to give away substantial portions of their wealth to address pressing global issues.
The impact of Jagger’s potential philanthropy extends beyond his own personal decisions. It serves as a reminder to others in positions of privilege that they too have the ability to make a difference and contribute to the betterment of society. Jagger’s willingness to consider donating his wealth not only highlights his own values and beliefs but also sets an example for others to follow.
Furthermore, Jagger’s decision not to publish an autobiography raises questions about privacy, the preservation of personal history, and the control individuals have over their own narratives. While many celebrities and public figures choose to share their life stories, Jagger has chosen a different path. This decision demonstrates his desire to maintain control over how he is perceived and remembered by the public.
In conclusion, Mick Jagger’s recent comments about not leaving his entire fortune to his children have sparked a debate about the responsibility of the wealthy, the value of inheritance, and the potential impact of philanthropy. His consideration of donating his wealth to charity and his decision to forgo an autobiography demonstrate his unique perspective on wealth, privacy, and personal legacy. Regardless of the ultimate decisions Jagger makes, his openness to discussing these topics serves as an important reminder that wealth can and should be used to make a positive and lasting impact on the world.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
