the federalist

Media distort truth about leftist-linked voter roll ‘maintenance’ group to shield Democrats’ election machine

Leftists’ Scheme to Inflate Voter Rolls Exposed

Over the past two weeks, regime-approved press outlets have run several⁣ articles ‌rushing to⁤ the defense of⁣ leftists’ latest scheme to inflate voter‍ rolls with likely-Democrat voters: the Electronic Registration Information Center.

Otherwise known as ERIC, this organization is a ​widely used voter-roll “management” system ‌founded ‌by Democrat activist David Becker that was “sold to states as a quick‍ and easy way to update their voter rolls.”​ In reality, ERIC’s membership agreement places a higher priority on registering new ⁤voters than on cleaning‌ up existing voter rolls.

The program inflates voter rolls by requiring member ​states to contact “eligible but unregistered” residents to encourage them to register to vote. When⁢ a state becomes an ERIC member, it is required to submit “all active and​ inactive voter files,” “all licensing or ⁤identification records⁢ contained in the motor vehicles database,” and any state files related to “voter registration functions” to the organization, which⁢ then compares this information with that submitted by other member states.

It’s after this process that⁢ ERIC compiles updated voter-roll information — including lists of voters who have⁤ multiple registrations, moved, or ⁣died, and lists of “eligible but unregistered” voters — and sends it to member states. As Victoria Marshall wrote in these pages, ERIC mandates that states engage in voter​ list maintenance “only after [they have] independently validated” the data they receive from the organization. In other words, “if a state does not independently validate ⁢the ERIC data, it is not ⁢required to clean its voter rolls.”

ERIC’s ties to Becker — who has since resigned from his role as⁣ a nonvoting ‌ERIC board member — and its refusal to change its bylaws have prompted a⁣ flurry of‍ GOP election officials‌ to withdraw their states from the organization within the past two years.‍ Included in this growing list are⁣ the states of‌ Virginia,‍ Florida, Ohio, Texas, and several others. Some of these ‌jurisdictions, including Virginia, Ohio, and Alabama,‌ have since formed separate ⁤interstate voter⁢ data-sharing pacts to serve as an ERIC‍ replacement.

In light of ERIC’s steady collapse, Votebeat’s Jen Fifield and Rolling ⁣Stone’s Adam Rawnsley and Asawin Suebsaeng⁢ have painted these GOP officials ⁢as “conspiracy theorists” and fomented Democrat ‌accusations ‌that these states are struggling to ⁣effectively share and maintain ⁢accurate voter rolls. While handing out “far-right” and “MAGA​ Republican” labels like candy ⁤on Halloween, these ‍“reporters” weave ‍a web of ⁢deception to obscure the organization’s role in Democrats’ ​election machine.

Both articles’ writers, for example, attempt to pin the‌ source of Republican⁢ election officials’ concerns with‌ ERIC on a 2022 Gateway Pundit piece about the organization, which​ they quickly dismiss as riddled with “conspiracy theories.” ‌Of course, nowhere in⁤ their ⁢articles do these so-called “journalists” bother to explore one of the — if not the — most alarming details ‌about ERIC: the group’s ties to the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR), a Becker-founded nonprofit responsible for interfering in the 2020 election to help Democrats.

CEIR and the Center‌ for​ Tech and Civic Life collectively received hundreds ‌of millions of dollars from Meta‌ CEO Mark Zuckerberg leading up to the⁣ 2020 ‍contest. These “Zuckbucks” were then poured into local election offices throughout the ‍country⁣ to push sloppy⁤ Democrat-backed voting policies, such as⁢ mass mail-in voting and the widespread use of ballot drop boxes. Analyses have shown⁤ these grants were‌ heavily skewed toward Democrat municipalities, especially in swing states, effectively making it⁢ a giant Democrat get-out-the-vote operation.

As ‌The Federalist previously reported and‍ communication records have indicated, CEIR‌ enjoys a transactional relationship with ERIC, which sends the⁤ voter-roll data it receives from states ⁤to ‌CEIR. Upon receiving the data, CEIR “then develops targeted mailing lists and sends them back to the states to use for voter ⁣registration outreach.” In other words, CEIR — a highly partisan nonprofit with a history of left-wing activism — is creating lists of potential (and likely Democrat) voters for states to register in⁢ the lead-up to major⁤ elections.

Convenient how that incredibly important detail didn’t make it into the Votebeat and Rolling Stone articles, isn’t it?

Fifield then took things a step further ⁤by​ advancing the contrived narrative‌ that‌ Republican officials whose states left ERIC are having difficulty sharing ​voter data with other states and ensuring accuracy ⁢within ‌their voter rolls. She bases this claim⁣ upon internal documents obtained by American Oversight, a left-wing nonprofit dedicated to “filing open records requests targeting Republican interests.”

Contrary⁣ to Fifield’s activist ⁣“reporting,” several GOP secretaries of⁢ state⁣ whose jurisdictions have ⁣departed ERIC have publicly testified under⁤ oath‌ that they haven’t experienced any issues⁤ with managing their voter ⁤rolls since withdrawing from the organization. In October, Secretaries of State Frank LaRose of Ohio and Cord Byrd of Florida ‍spoke before a Pennsylvania Senate committee hearing about their respective experiences with ERIC and maintaining accurate voter registration lists since departing the program.

When asked if he thought states ⁣can keep voter ​rolls clean without ERIC, LaRose replied, “100⁤ percent,” and went on to debunk Democrats’ sky-is-falling talking points about what​ will happen if states withdraw from the organization.

ERIC “has only existed⁢ for the‌ last⁤ 10 or 12 years, and states have had this ‍responsibility for a long ⁤time to maintain accurate voter rolls,” LaRose said. “States​ absolutely can maintain the accuracy of their voter rolls if they’re intentional about it. And it’s important to use all the ⁢different⁢ tools ​at your disposal.”

LaRose went on to describe Ohio’s various processes of removing ⁢deceased voters, noncitizens, and other ineligible voters from its voter registration lists. He also discussed the effectiveness of data-sharing pacts with other‍ states and noted Ohio’s ⁢intent to formulate these agreements with more states ahead of the 2024 ​election.

Meanwhile, Byrd explained how interstate data-sharing agreements have allowed Florida to possess greater control over its voter‍ data, saying, “We⁢ know exactly what we’re sharing with the other state [and] ⁤ they know what they’re sharing with us.” Byrd expressed hope ​that “through these different [memorandums of understanding] ⁣ … a consistent standard will be created” when it ⁢comes to states exchanging voter⁢ data.

ERIC’s role in the left’s get-out-the-vote apparatus is bigger than⁤ Democrats are willing to admit — and ⁣that’s exactly why their regime-approved media allies will⁢ never tell their readers the truth about it.


What is the tie between ERIC and the‍ Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR)‌ and how ⁣does‌ it impact voter registration outreach?

Leftists’ ‍Scheme to Inflate Voter Rolls‍ Exposed

In recent weeks, there has been a rush⁤ by regime-approved⁢ press outlets to defend ⁣the latest scheme by leftists to inflate voter rolls with ​likely-Democrat voters. This scheme revolves around the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), a ​voter-roll “management” system founded by Democrat activist David Becker. While ERIC was sold as a quick ‍and easy way to update voter rolls, its true intentions have come to‌ light.

One of the ways ‍ERIC inflates voter rolls is by‌ requiring member states to contact​ “eligible but unregistered” residents ​and⁣ encourage them to register to ⁤vote. ⁢When a state becomes an ERIC member, it is obliged to submit all active and inactive voter⁣ files, licensing records,‍ identification records, and any state files related to ⁢voter registration functions to the ⁤organization. ERIC then compares this information with that submitted by⁣ other member states to compile updated voter-roll‌ information.

The problem⁣ lies in the fact that ERIC’s membership agreement places a higher ⁣priority on registering new voters rather than cleaning up existing voter rolls. States are only required to engage in voter list maintenance ‍if they independently validate the data they ⁢receive from ERIC. This loophole allows states to neglect their⁣ responsibility to clean their voter rolls if they choose not to validate the data provided by ERIC.

Due to ERIC’s ties to David Becker and its refusal to change‍ its bylaws, ​many GOP election officials have withdrawn their states ‌from the organization in the past two⁣ years. States like Virginia,⁣ Florida, Ohio, Texas, and several others have formed separate interstate voter data-sharing pacts to serve as⁣ replacements for ERIC.

Despite‍ ERIC’s steady ⁢collapse, ‍certain ‍media outlets have resorted to labeling GOP officials as “conspiracy theorists.” These outlets,⁤ such as Votebeat​ and Rolling Stone,⁤ have attempted to downplay Republican ​concerns about ERIC. They try to attribute these concerns to a 2022 ‌Gateway Pundit piece that they dismiss as riddled with conspiracy theories. However, these outlets conveniently ignore the⁤ most ​alarming detail about ERIC: its ties to the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR), a nonprofit founded by Becker.

CEIR, along with the Center for ​Tech and Civic⁤ Life, received hundreds of millions of dollars from Mark Zuckerberg leading up to the 2020 election. These funds were used to support Democrat-backed voting policies in local election offices across the country. Notably, these grants heavily favored Democrat municipalities and served as a significant get-out-the-vote operation for Democrats.

As previously reported, CEIR has a⁣ transactional relationship with ERIC, as ERIC sends voter-roll‍ data to CEIR, which then develops targeted mailing lists for voter registration outreach. This detail, crucial to understanding the‌ scope of ERIC’s influence, is conveniently left out of articles by ‌biased outlets.

Furthermore, claims made by Votebeat’s Jen​ Fifield that Republican​ officials are struggling‌ to share voter ‌data​ and maintain accurate⁤ voter rolls since withdrawing from ERIC⁣ are⁤ baseless. Multiple GOP secretaries of state have testified​ under oath that ⁣they haven’t encountered any issues with managing voter rolls after leaving ERIC.

The scheme to inflate voter rolls through ERIC is a clear example of leftists’ efforts to manipulate the electoral system. By prioritizing new registrations over cleaning up existing ⁤voter rolls and by conveniently neglecting key information in their reporting, left-leaning media outlets are ⁢complicit⁣ in promoting this ‍deceptive agenda. It’s essential for the public to be aware of the facts and remain vigilant in protecting the⁤ integrity of ⁣our electoral process.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker