the epoch times

Massachusetts’ new bill enforces ‘unprecedented gun control’.

Massachusetts House Approves‌ Tougher Firearm⁣ Laws,⁤ Targets “Ghost ⁣Guns”

Massachusetts House lawmakers made a significant ⁢move on ‌Oct. 18 by passing a measure that aims to⁣ strengthen the state’s firearm laws and crack down on unregistered “ghost guns.” This legislation, known as H. 4135, has been ​met‍ with strong opposition ‍from gun rights advocates who​ claim ⁣it is “the worst anti-gun legislation in the country.”

The⁣ bill, passed with a 120–38 vote, proposes several key changes.‌ It mandates ‍the serialization and registration‌ of ‌crucial gun components, enhances efforts to prevent ‌illegal guns from ⁤entering ⁣the‍ state, ‍and‍ modernizes the existing firearm registration system.⁤ Additionally, it expands the ban on assault weapons by prohibiting the purchase of ⁣AR-15-style firearms and the conversion of legal ⁣guns into illegal ‍automatic weapons.

The proposed regulation also includes provisions to outlaw firearm possession while intoxicated, ⁣prohibit firing guns near homes,⁤ and ban carrying firearms in polling‍ places, schools, and⁢ government buildings. Furthermore, it seeks to expand the ⁢state’s “red flag” ⁤laws, which allow ⁤judges to temporarily suspend gun licenses of individuals deemed to ⁤be a risk to themselves or others.

The passage of ​H. 4135 has faced strong criticism from gun rights ⁣advocates,⁢ particularly the National Rifle Association of America-Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA).⁢ In an‌ Oct. 18 ​statement, the NRA-ILA‍ urged supporters to voice their opposition to the bill‍ by contacting their state senators.

The NRA-ILA described⁤ H. 4135⁢ as a bill that rewrites gun laws ‍in the Commonwealth and imposes unprecedented gun control measures.‌ They argue that it includes widespread bans on ‍commonly ‌owned firearms, eliminates due process through​ expanded “red flag”‌ laws, expands gun registry⁣ programs, and places an extreme financial burden​ on gun owners.

According ⁢to Massachusetts Rep.​ Ronald Mariano (D-Quincy), the ⁤legislation was prompted by a U.S.⁤ Supreme Court decision in 2022 that expanded Second Amendment‍ rights. He stated ​that ‍the Supreme Court’s ruling nullified certain components of the state’s gun⁤ laws, posing a threat to public safety.

Mr. Mariano wrote on X (formerly known as ‌Twitter), “With the passage of this legislation, the House has once again displayed⁢ an ‌unwavering commitment ​to ensuring that Massachusetts remains one of ‌the safest⁤ states in the country.”

Donna Stevenson, a volunteer with the Massachusetts chapter of Moms Demand Action, expressed support for‍ the bill, stating that it is a vital‍ step forward in addressing gun violence and providing resources ⁢to combat ⁣the crisis.

Opposition From Police Chiefs, Republicans

The Massachusetts Chiefs of Police ​Association unanimously criticized the bill, opposing its measures. As the ones responsible⁣ for approving gun⁣ licenses in the‌ state, the police chiefs will be tasked with enforcing the regulations outlined in ⁤the bill.

There were‌ concerns raised about off-duty officers not being allowed to carry their⁢ weapons. However, lawmakers amended H. 4135 ⁢to⁢ permit off-duty officers to carry guns, even in ‍prohibited places like ‌government buildings and schools.

Firearms ‌on display at Gun Effects in​ Los‍ Angeles on⁤ Sept. 8, 2023. (Christina Corona/NTD)

Jim Wallace, executive director of the Gun‌ Owners’ Action League, criticized H. 4135 as an overreaction to ‌a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in New York. He argued that the proposal unfairly targets law-abiding⁤ gun⁣ owners instead of focusing on reducing⁣ crime.

The bill sparked heated debates ​in the⁣ House, with ‍Republicans voicing their concerns about the strict measures. Rep. Peter Durant (R-Mass.) emphasized the⁤ importance of keeping people safe ‍without infringing on ⁢the rights of ​legal⁢ citizens.

Massachusetts already has some ​of the strictest gun ⁣laws in⁤ the United States, and it boasts the lowest gun ⁤death rates among all states, according to‍ Statista data. ‌In 2023,⁤ the state recorded a gun death rate of 3.4 per 100,000 residents, significantly lower than the highest-ranking state, ​Mississippi, which had a rate of 33.9 per 100,000 residents.

As of now, ​the state Senate has yet to introduce its version of the legislation. ⁢Once both Democrat-led chambers finalize⁣ a single bill,⁣ it will be sent to Gov. Maura‌ Healey, a Democrat, ⁢for her ⁤signature before becoming law.

While the Senate leaders have not announced a specific timeline, Senate President⁣ Karen Spilka (D-Ashland) ⁣expects the final ‍bill to reach the governor’s desk‍ by the end​ of the current legislative⁢ session in July 2024.

How does the proposed legislation in Massachusetts aim to address the issue of “ghost ‌guns”?

Massachusetts House Approves Tougher Firearm ⁣Laws, Targets “Ghost Guns”

In a significant ‌move on October 18, Massachusetts House​ lawmakers passed a measure aimed at strengthening the⁤ state’s firearm laws and cracking down‍ on unregistered⁤ “ghost guns.”⁣ This legislation, known as H. ‍4135, ⁣has faced strong opposition ‌from gun rights advocates who⁤ claim‌ it‍ is “the worst⁤ anti-gun legislation in the country.”

The bill, passed with a 120–38 vote, proposes several key⁣ changes. It mandates the serialization and registration of crucial gun components, enhances efforts to ‍prevent illegal guns from entering the state, and modernizes the existing firearm⁤ registration system. Additionally, ​it expands⁢ the ban ⁣on assault‍ weapons by prohibiting the purchase of AR-15-style‍ firearms and the conversion of legal guns into illegal automatic‌ weapons.

The proposed regulation also includes provisions to outlaw firearm ​possession⁢ while intoxicated, prohibit firing ‍guns near ⁤homes,‌ and⁤ ban carrying firearms in polling places, schools,⁤ and government ​buildings. Furthermore,⁢ it seeks⁢ to expand the⁢ state’s “red flag” laws, which allow judges to temporarily suspend‌ gun licenses of individuals deemed ‍to be a risk to themselves or others.

This new legislation reflects the ⁤ongoing efforts to address gun ⁣violence and ‌promote public safety. By implementing stricter laws⁤ and regulations, Massachusetts aims to prevent the proliferation‍ of unregistered and illegal firearms. Ghost guns, which are homemade firearms ‍without serial numbers, pose a significant ‌challenge to law enforcement as they cannot ​be traced or easily detected. By mandating the serialization and registration of ‌gun components, the state hopes to close this loophole and ensure that every firearm in circulation ⁣can be accounted for.

Opponents argue⁤ that these measures infringe upon ‌their ‌Second Amendment rights and will⁣ only affect law-abiding citizens‌ who already comply with existing firearm regulations. They fear ‍that such regulations will not effectively deter criminals who obtain firearms​ through illicit means. Critics⁢ also express concern that​ the expanded definition of assault weapons may ban firearms that are commonly used for self-defense⁣ or sport shooting, impacting law-abiding gun owners.

Proponents‌ of these stricter firearm laws ​argue that they ⁢are necessary to protect public safety and reduce gun violence. They believe that closing the loophole for ghost guns and ‌strengthening the ​state’s existing regulations will make ⁢it harder for dangerous individuals to acquire firearms. The‌ expansion of “red flag” ‌laws ​is​ seen as a⁢ crucial step in identifying and temporarily disarming individuals who are at risk ⁤of causing harm to themselves ⁤or others.

It is important to note that this legislation has not yet become‌ law. It must still be​ approved by the Massachusetts Senate and signed by the Governor before it ⁢can be enacted. ‍However, the strong support in the House ⁣suggests that it ​stands a good chance of moving forward.

The passage of tougher firearm laws in⁤ Massachusetts brings​ attention to⁤ the ongoing ‌debate ⁤over gun control in the United States. As different states grapple with ​this issue, there is a need to find a balance between protecting individual ⁣rights and ensuring⁤ public safety. Only time will tell⁣ whether these measures will have ​the desired effect of reducing‌ gun violence in⁤ Massachusetts.


Related Stories:

California Gun Control⁤ Makes It Harder⁢ to⁢ Fight‌ Back Against Hamas-Like ‍Terrorism

Date: ‍10/17/2023



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker