the epoch times

Maine healthcare workers challenge vaccine mandate in Supreme Court.

The hardline ⁤COVID-19 vaccination policies of Maine’s Democrat governor, Janet Mills, the state health care bureaucracy, and four major hospital systems, are being challenged in the United States Supreme Court.

The cause​ of action ‌arose on August 12, 2021, when Ms. Mills announced a vaccination mandate and threatened to yank the licenses‍ and fine ⁢any ‍employer of health care ‍workers who did ‍not enforce it.

Effective September​ 1, 2021,​ the new mandate eliminated all exemptions ⁣based on religious grounds.

The vaccination requirement forced the state’s health care workers whose religious convictions would not permit them to take the shot, to either​ be vaccinated or be ⁣fired.

According to a⁤ study ‌ by the Maine Policy⁢ Institute, nearly ‍ten percent of Maine’s health care workers refused the COVID-19 vaccine and⁤ were terminated. The action further aggravated the state’s pre-pandemic nursing shortage.

Valued Employees or Expendables?

Mat Staver, founder ⁤of Liberty Counsel,‍ a non-profit⁢ legal foundation representing seven discharged health care professionals, told The Epoch Times, “Not only⁤ did their employers kick them to the curb, ​but they dismissed them for insubordination, ​thereby ensuring the⁣ nurses could not draw unemployment compensation.”

Ms. Mills’ mandate cast‌ a broad net ⁤by defining‌ “health care worker” as “any individual employed by a hospital, multi-level health care facility, home health ⁣agency, nursing facility, residential care facility, and intermediate care facility for individuals with intellectual disabilities…those employed by emergency medical service organizations or dental practices.”

Mr. Staver said that because of the broad mandate, the nurses found it impossible to get ​another job in the health care⁣ profession within the state of Maine.

Maine‍ Gov. Janet Mills in⁤ 2019. (Rebecca Hammel/U.S. Senate/Public Domain)

The chief plaintiff in the case, Alicia Lowe, a‌ head operating room nurse⁤ for 20 years, is out “working construction to make ends meet,” ⁢said Mr. Staver. “Many people are still suffering.”

Fighting for‌ Their Rights

In an effort to⁢ defend their constitutional rights and to keep their jobs, Ms. Lowe and a group of fired health care workers initially filed suit in U.S. District Court.

After losing their case ⁣in the ⁤district court,⁣ Ms. Lowe and her co-plaintiffs appealed to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (First‍ Circuit),​ where they won on their free exercise ‌of ⁣religion argument but​ lost on‌ their contention that any⁣ state law or regulation must comply with the “due hardship and reasonable accommodation” employment provisions ⁢of Title​ VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

According to Mr. Staver, seven other federal ‌circuit ‍courts have​ handed down decisions contrary to the First⁤ Circuit’s ruling on Title VII compliance.

On August 15, 2023, Liberty⁤ Counsel announced it ‍had filed a​ writ certiorari—a legal process by which the U.S. Supreme ⁢Court is asked to review the actions of​ lower courts or government agencies.

A Familiar Tactic

The case,⁣ Alicia Lowe et al. v. ⁢Janet Mills et al.,⁢ is still moving forward despite a recent proposal by the Maine‍ Department of Health‍ and⁣ Human Services⁢ (DHHS) to remove the COVID-19 vaccination mandate from the ​state’s health care workers.

If, after a period‍ of public comment, the proposal is approved, it would take effect at the end of this year.

Coming shortly‌ after the appeals court ruled in the nurses’​ favor and reversed the ⁤district court’s decision on their free exercise of religion claim, the creation and timing of the DHHS proposal came as no surprise⁢ to Mr. Staver.

“It’s a familiar tactic by⁢ Maine Democrats led by ⁢Governor Mills. They have done​ this kind of thing before. ‘Nothing‌ to ​see ‍here. No ⁣worries. We’re going to rescind the mandate.’

“I ‍think she saw the 3-0 reversal by ⁣the court of appeals and does ⁤not want to defend the case⁣ and open the‌ state up to discovery. ​But guess what? With our filing, the state government is now open to discovery,”⁤ Mr. Staver​ said.

The Governor’s Rationale

Ms. Mills has not issued a formal statement about the appeal to the U.S.⁣ Supreme Court by Liberty Counsel.

However, after a previous round of the many legal challenges ‍to ⁣her vaccination mandate, Ms.⁤ Mills ⁣stated, “Vaccinations ‌are the best tool ⁢we ⁢have to protect ‌the lives and livelihoods ‌of Maine‌ people‌ and to curb this pandemic…Anyone who is placed in the‌ care of a health care worker‍ has the right ‍to expect, as do their families, that they will receive high-quality,⁤ safe care from fully vaccinated staff.

“This rule protects health care workers, ‍their patients, and our health care⁤ capacity in the‌ face ​of this deadly virus.

An Act‌ of Love

“As Pope Francis⁣ said, getting vaccinated is an ‘act ⁤of ⁤love,’” said Ms. Mills.

In a press‍ release announcing Liberty Counsel’s​ Supreme Court appeal, Mr.⁢ Staver said, “Governor Janet Mills ‌and health officials have acted ‍as if Maine is exempt from ⁤federal law by denying these health care workers’ religious exemptions.

“Since there is now a conflict in the courts regarding Title VII anti-discrimination protections, we are⁤ asking the U.S. ‍Supreme ​Court to review this‍ case.

“Federal⁤ law and the rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution ca

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker