MAHA takes victory lap after killing pesticide provision in farm bill
The MAHA faction of the Republican Party won its first major policy victory in Congress by successfully removing a pesticide-labeling provision from the farm bill. The stripped language would have prevented states and courts from penalizing pesticide companies for not including health concerns on product labels beyond what the EPA recognizes-something critics said would have protected companies from lawsuits over cancers and other illnesses linked to thes chemicals.
The amendment passed 280-142, backed by 73 Republicans and 207 Democrats, while 135 Republicans and 6 Democrats voted against. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), who proposed the amendment, said she and other holdouts would block the bill unless the pesticide provision was removed. Supporters framed the change as a win for states’ rights and public health, while other farm bill advocates and Republicans who opposed the measure argued it was important for maintaining access to “well-regulated” pesticide tools.
The effort succeeded for MAHA on this front,but other MAHA-backed amendments failed,including proposals to restrict SNAP purchases of soda and to end mandatory electronic identification tags for cattle.
The Make America Healthy Again faction of the Republican Party got its first major policy win in Congress on Thursday.
MAHA successfully stripped a provision from the farm bill that would have blocked states and courts from penalizing pesticide companies that do not include health concerns on their labels beyond those recognized by the Environmental Protection Agency. Critics said the provision was a giveaway to pesticide companies and would have prevented lawsuits over certain cancers and other diseases caused by the products.
Recommended Stories
Overall, the provision was stripped in a 280-142 vote. 73 Republicans and 207 Democrats voted for the amendment, which was offered by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL). Meanwhile, 135 Republicans and 6 Democrats opposed the measure. California Rep. Kevin Kiley, an independent who caucuses with Republicans, also voted against.
“Huge win for states rights and MAHA,” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) wrote in a post on X. “The special provisions for pesticides (and herbicides like glyphosate) was just stripped from the farm bill by an overwhelming majority!”
Prior to the vote on the amendment, Luna threatened that she and other Republican holdouts would “slaughter” the farm bill if the pesticide provisions were not stripped from the legislation.
“Thank you thank you to everyone — including the #MAHA activists who raised hell and said loud and clear: we cannot support a Farm Bill that puts chemical company profits over the health of Americans!” Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-ME) wrote on X.
While Democrats and some Republicans supported this amendment, other farm bill advocates were not happy with the changes. Luna called the lawmakers opposing her amendment “sick freaks.”
“I have now been accosted by two Republican members of Congress for trying to remove pesticide liability protections,” Luna wrote on X. “Both of which claim to be “God-fearing” Christians, but are shilling for cancer causing pesticide companies. Yikes.”
House Agriculture Committee Chairman G.T. Thompson (R-PA) argued against the pesticide reform in the House Rules Committee meeting, saying it is “critical for securing access to the well-regulated pesticide tools,” as Republicans have been honing in on food affordability ahead of November’s election.
HOUSE ADVANCES $70 BILLION IN ICE AND CBP FUNDING VIA RECONCILIATION
Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) said earlier this week that he supported stripping out the provision because constituents in Texas are “raising that issue and saying that states ought to have the ability to manage and deal with that.”
While this amendment was a success for MAHA, other amendments for the movement did not pass, including prohibiting the purchase of soda with SNAP and ending mandatory electronic identification tags in cattle.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
