Rachel Levine, Local Dude Demands that Medical Boards Pressurize Big Tech To End Transgender Heresy

Dr. Rachel LevineA man who self-identifies as a woman called on doctors at state medical boards for Big Tech to stop allowing him to work in the field. “medical misinformation” He declared right after that there was no “scientific or medical dispute” Learn more about the advantages of experimental drugs and surgeries that force male bodies to look like female bodies, or vice versa.

Levine, federal Department of Health and Human Services assistant secretary of Health, presented a highly dubious worldview of science and behaved as if no rational person would dare to dissent.

His worldview holds that biological males can be females and vice versa. These people are more likely to commit suicide than if doctors inject them with drugs to defer puberty or introduce a. hormone disease into their bodies, and perhaps even remove healthy body parts and reshape them into facsimiles of the opposite sex’s organs.

Levine, a Tulane University School of Medicine graduate, stated that there is no dispute over the value of such. “treatments” constitutes dangerous “misinformation” These must be deleted from social media.

His support for such digital censorship This could be described as a modern inquisition to suppress heresy against transgender worldview. It is disguised in scientific language to make it appear professional.

Levine supported online censorship during a virtual address to Federation of State Medical Boards, May, in a speech regarding the COVID-19 epidemic. The speech attracted renewed online attention in recent days. Levine then addressed medical misinformation about the pandemic. “another area of substantial misinformation that is directly impacting health equity in our nation, and that is the health equity of sexual and gender minorities.”

“There is substantial misinformation about gender-affirming care for transgender and gender-diverse individuals,” He stated. “We are in this nation facing an onslaught of anti-LGBTQI+ actions at the state levels across the United States, and they are dangerous to the public health. They target and politicize evidence-based treatments that should be considered the standard of care and actually aim to criminalize, criminalize medical providers, including physicians providing care to their patients.”

“The positive value of gender-affirming care for youth and adults is not in scientific or medical dispute,” Levine claimed. “So, we all need to work together to get our voices out in the front line, we need to get our voices in the public eye, and we know how effective our medical community can be talking to communities, whether it’s at town halls, schools, conversations with others, and we need to use our clinicians’ voice to collectively advocate for our tech companies to create a healthier, cleaner information environment.”

The Department of Health and Human Services has not responded to the inquiry. The Daily Signal‘s request for comment on how Levine responds to criticism and whether he stands by his call for censorship.

Levine used the euphemism to explain the type of medical intervention he supports. “gender-affirming care.” This term is used to describe various attempts to make an biologically male body look like a woman’s or vice versa. “gender identity” that often—although not always—corresponds to the gender opposite that of a person’s biological sex.

It covers so-called puberty blocking drugs such as Leuprorelin. These block precocious puberty and can be used to perform other functions. “chemical castration” on violent sex offenders. For those entering puberty, it encompasses cross-sex hormones—estrogen for males and testosterone for females—in an attempt to change secondary sex characteristics. For some later teens and adults, it encompasses the removal or alteration of body parts—gonads, breast tissue, facial structure, and the Adam’s apple—in order to make males appear female or vice versa.

Levine referenced a Feb. 25 study published by the to support his claim. Journal of the American Medical Association The odds of depression in moderate and severe levels was 60% lower among the 104 teenagers aged 13-20 who had been given so-called cross-sex hormones or puberty blockers over a 12-month span.

Yet this study does not come close to proving Levine’s claim that experimental medical interventions are “not in scientific or medical dispute.” Many national health organizations offer support, “gender-affirming care,” The Florida Board of Medicine Last month, the Florida Board of Osteopathic Medicine approved a new rule prohibiting puberty blockers and transgender surgeries in minors.

Joseph Ladapo, Florida General Surgeon, had warned that the state “must do more to protect children from politics-based medicine. Otherwise, children and adolescents in our state will continue to face a substantial risk of long-term harm.”

“While some professional organizations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Endocrine Society, recommend these treatments for ‘gender-affirming’ care, the scientific evidence supporting these complex medical interventions is extraordinarily weak,” Ladapo wrote the Florida Board of Medicine.

The Florida Department of Public Health determined in April That “systematic reviews on hormonal treatment for young people show a trend of low-quality evidence, small sample sizes, and medium to high risk of bias.” According to the International Review of Psychiatry, 80% of people seeking psychotherapy will no longer want to identify with the other sex.

This trend goes beyond Florida. Karolinska Hospital in Sweden In May 2021, it was stated that it would not recommend hormonal treatments for minors under 16.

In June 2021, Finland released These guidelines are medically objectionable for minors. “Cross-sex identification in childhood, even in extreme cases, generally disappears during puberty.” These guidelines are from Finland. “The first-line treatment for gender dysphoria is psychosocial support and, as necessary, psychotherapy and treatment of possible comorbid psychiatric disorders.”

In April 2021, Britain’s National Institute of Health and Care Excellence concluded that the evidence Treatment of young people with puberty-blocking drugs is an option. “very low” Also, existing studies on the drugs were not extensive. “subject to bias and confounding.”

Many people are interested in this. mutilated their bodies In the pursuit of a transgender identification, have spoken out against it “cult” That entrapped them.

“I’m a real, live 22-year-old woman, with a scarred chest and a broken voice, and five o’clock shadow because I couldn’t face the idea of growing up to be a woman. That’s my reality,” Cari Stella said in a disturbing YouTube video.

Others have supported states that have banned drugs which could stunt or sterilize minors. “I believe every state needs to pass a law that protects our youth in this way,” Chloe Cole was a woman who rejected a male gender identity. said about the Arkansas law.

It is possible. “compassionate” to encourage an identity that is false to a person’s physical body? It would be kind to tell an obese girl that she can starve herself if she wrongly believes she is fat? Such a thing would be considered compassionate? “treatment” Would major medical institutions endorse anorexia?

Medical associations can’t be wrong, right? They can be wrong, as history has shown. “Progressive” Scientists once supported eugenics, lobotomies, and other high-level medical practices. The inventor of lobotomy received a Nobel PrizeMany Nobel laureates, including. supported eugenics.  

It isn’t “misinformation” To question the worth of “treatments” Children will be left scarred, stunted and infertile as a result. “care” aims to reverse the biological sex written in the DNA of every cell in a person’s body.

Yet Levine’s transgender worldview will not brook heresy, and he aims to enlist doctors to pressure Big Tech to silence anyone who would dare criticize his experimental “treatments.” Perhaps he’s terrified to hear that he himself might be misinformed.

You have an opinion on this article? Send an email to let us know your opinion. [email protected] and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Be sure to include the article’s url, headline, and your name.