Lindsay Clancy jurors say holdout had ‘reasonable doubt’
Three jurors involved in the Lindsay Clancy trial have spoken publicly for the first time following a judge’s declaration of a mistrial. The jurors expressed their frustration over the difficulty in reaching a unanimous decision, notably noting that one juror had acknowledged having “reasonable doubt.” Jury foreperson Roni Carlson shared her excitement when she was about to fill out the forms indicating her vote of reasonable doubt, but the trial ultimately resulted in a mistrial due to unresolved disagreements among the jurors.
Three jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial spoke out for the first time after a judge declared a mistrial, describing the frustration of trying to reach a unanimous verdict with one holdout juror who they said acknowledged having “reasonable doubt.”
“He admitted he had reasonable doubt, and I started filling out the forms. I was so excited,” jury foreperson Roni Carlson told Boston NBC10 in an interview alongside two other female jurors.
Stay informed.Stay ahead.
Join Washington Examiner for unlimited access to the news, analysis, and commentary that matter most.
Already a member? Log in
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
