DA says Lin Wood is a key witness in Trump election case.
Renowned attorney Lin Wood, known for his support of former President Donald Trump’s election fraud claims, has emerged as a witness in the election case involving the former president, according to a recent court filing. This surprising development comes despite Mr. Wood’s denial of the allegations in a social media post.
The court filing, which discussed potential conflicts of interest among defense attorneys, mentioned Mr. Wood’s involvement due to his previous representation of witnesses in related court proceedings.
Witnesses for the State
The District Attorney’s office stated in the filing that ”Lin Wood, Coreco Ja’Quan Perason, Vikki Townsend Consiglio, Gloria Kay Godwin, James Kenneth Carroll, and Carolyn Hall Fisher are witnesses for the State in the present case” (pdf).
As a witness, Mr. Wood may face cross-examination from his former attorney, Harry W. MacDougald, who is representing defendant Jeffrey Clark in the DA’s racketeering case. Mr. MacDougald previously served as co-counsel for Sidney Powell, another defendant in the Fulton County case, as well as Mr. Wood in a lawsuit related to the 2020 election that was ultimately dismissed.
Concerns and Response
Prosecutors expressed concerns about potential violations of professional conduct rules and the impact on the rights of certain witnesses if they are cross-examined by their former attorneys. In response to the district attorney’s filing, Mr. Wood took to his Telegram social media account to release a statement, vehemently denying the accusations of flipping on President Trump. He expressed confusion about being called as a witness and dismissed the media’s attempts to tarnish his reputation.
Addressing the claims circulating on social media and in the press, Mr. Wood’s statement emphasized his unwavering support for President Trump and his co-defendants. The unexpected turn of events has sparked reactions, with national security attorney Bradley Moss expressing surprise at Mr. Wood’s involvement.
Background and Legal Challenges
While Mr. Wood made numerous claims about election fraud following the 2020 election, it is important to note that he was never an official member of the former president’s legal team. Furthermore, he has not been indicted in the Fulton County DA’s case.
However, a Georgia grand jury previously recommended charging Mr. Wood for his post-election activities, along with other individuals, including Senator Lindsey Graham and two former Georgia senators. Nevertheless, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis decided not to pursue charges against him.
Last month, Mr. Wood revealed to CNBC that he testified before the Georgia grand jury, following a “material witness” subpoena. He complied with the subpoena, providing approximately 90 minutes of testimony. However, the details of his testimony remain undisclosed.
In August 2022, Mr. Wood expressed his willingness to cooperate with the special grand jury, stating that he had been informed he was a material witness. He maintained his innocence, stating that he had nothing to hide and would fully cooperate.
Since the 2020 election, Mr. Wood has encountered numerous legal challenges. Former colleagues filed lawsuits against him for alleged breaches of contract, and he faced sanctions in Michigan for his involvement in election lawsuits. In May, the Georgia Bar held a trial to determine whether he should be disbarred from practicing law in the state.
In July, Mr. Wood announced his retirement from the legal profession, opting to surrender his law license rather than face the disciplinary proceedings initiated by the Georgia Bar. He concluded his announcement by stating that he had nothing to fear and was ready to face any consequences.
Mr. Wood gained national prominence in the 1990s when he successfully represented Richard Jewell, a security guard falsely accused in the media of involvement in the Atlanta Olympics bombing. He also represented the family of JonBenet Ramsey, a child model who was tragically murdered, and former California Representative Gary Condit in defamation suits.
The Epoch Times reached out to Mr. Wood for comment but has not received a response as of Wednesday.
What impact could Mr. Wood’s role as a witness have on the overall proceedings and the ongoing legal challenges surrounding the 2020 election
Ng Mr. Wood and others with voter fraud, now, it appears that Mr. Wood has found himself involved in the very case he previously advocated against.
The legal challenges surrounding the 2020 election have been widely debated and contested. Former President Trump and his supporters, including Mr. Wood, alleged widespread voter fraud and irregularities in key swing states. These claims were investigated by various courts and election officials, with no evidence of widespread fraud being found.
Mr. Wood, known for his outspoken support of the former president and his involvement in high-profile legal cases, has now become a witness in the election case. The court filing specifically mentioned him as a witness for the state, along with several other individuals.
This unexpected development has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and violations of professional conduct rules. Prosecutors expressed their concerns in the court filing, pointing out that Mr. Wood’s previous representation of witnesses in related court proceedings could create biases and impact the rights of those witnesses if they are cross-examined by their former attorney.
In response to the filing, Mr. Wood took to his Telegram social media account to vehemently deny the allegations and to reaffirm his unwavering support for President Trump and his co-defendants. He expressed confusion about being called as a witness and dismissed the media’s attempts to tarnish his reputation.
Legal experts and observers have expressed surprise at Mr. Wood’s involvement as a witness in the case. National security attorney Bradley Moss, for example, highlighted the unexpected turn of events. It remains to be seen how Mr. Wood’s role as a witness will develop and what impact it may have on the overall proceedings.
It is important to note that while Mr. Wood was an ardent supporter of former President Trump and made various claims of election fraud, he was never an official member of the former president’s legal team. Additionally, he has not been indicted in the Fulton County DA’s case. However, a Georgia grand jury had previously recommended charging Mr. Wood and others with voter fraud.
The involvement of Mr. Wood as a witness adds another layer of complexity and intrigue to the ongoing legal challenges surrounding the 2020 election. As the case progresses, it will be crucial to closely monitor the developments and their potential implications for all parties involved.
Ultimately, the truth and fairness of the election must be established through a thorough and unbiased legal process. The inclusion of witnesses, such as Mr. Wood, should be carefully scrutinized to ensure that justice is served and the integrity of the electoral system is upheld.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
