Kristi Noem expected to testify before Senate in March
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is expected to testify before the Senate judiciary Committee on March 3, with each senator allotted 10 minutes for questioning. The hearing follows intense scrutiny after the fatal Minneapolis shooting of Alex Pretti by a Border Patrol agent,which has sparked protests and renewed criticism of Immigration and Customs Enforcement tactics.Democrats are pressing for accountability—more than 100 house Democrats have called for Noem’s impeachment—while some Republicans have also voiced frustration that she declined to testify earlier. Noem has defended her actions, accusing Pretti of being a domestic terrorist and brandishing a weapon, a claim contested by bystander video. The White House has expressed confidence in Noem and moved to de-escalate the situation, including assigning Tom Homan to oversee immigration operations in Minnesota. Meanwhile, Sen. Thom Tillis placed a hold on DHS nominations over the delay,and the Senate Homeland Security Committee plans to request testimony from ICE and other immigration agency leaders. Sen. Dick Durbin criticized noem’s timing and suggested she might not remain in her post by March.
Kristi Noem expected to testify before Senate Judiciary Committee in March
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is expected to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee in March, giving lawmakers a rare chance to scrutinize her stewardship of the Department of Homeland Security after the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis.
DHS’s Office of Legislative Affairs agreed to a March 3 date for the testimony, according to a spokesperson for Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA), with each senator on the panel getting 10 minutes for questioning.
The testimony will bring intense scrutiny on Noem, who is facing growing calls for impeachment from Democrats critical of Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s tactics. Republicans have also expressed growing frustration with Noem for declining to sit for a hearing last year.
The Washington Examiner previously reported that Grassley was haggling with the administration over a date for testimony and that the length of questioning had become a sticking point. The breakthrough comes two days after Pretti was pinned and then killed by a Border Patrol agent, fanning weeks of protests in Minneapolis.
In the aftermath of the shooting, the Trump administration has signaled an interest in de-escalating the situation, with President Donald Trump revealing a “productive call” with Gov. Tim Walz (R-MN) on Monday. The president also assigned border czar Tom Homan to oversee immigration operations in the state.
The White House voiced confidence in Noem on Monday, denying that Trump is “dissatisfied” with her performance. So far, more than 100 House Democrats have called for her impeachment, while some congressional Republicans have criticized her “premature” response to Pretti’s death.
Noem accused Pretti of being a domestic terrorist and brandishing a weapon before he was shot, a claim disputed by bystander footage of the incident.
The Judiciary Committee hearing comes after Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) placed a hold on the confirmation of all DHS nominees at the beginning of the month, citing the delay in her testimony.
Also on Monday, the Senate’s Homeland Security Committee announced that it would be requesting testimony from the heads of ICE and related immigration agencies.
HOUSE REBELS PLAN FLOOR REVOLT OVER SENATE’S SAVE ACT INACTION
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, criticized Noem for not appearing before the panel sooner, suggesting in a statement that she may not be homeland secretary by the time the hearing date arrives in March.
“With all of the violence and deaths involving DHS, the Secretary is apparently in no hurry to account for her mismanagement of this national crisis,” Durbin said. “And she expects us to rubber stamp her record-breaking budget in the meantime.”
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."



