Knowles at Clemson emphasizes that children should not be treated as commodities

Michael Knowles: IVF and Surrogacy Turn Children into⁣ Commodities

In a ​captivating lecture at ​Clemson University,⁣ Daily‍ Wire Host Michael Knowles passionately argued that IVF and surrogacy ‌are not only morally hazardous but have also transformed human children into mere “commodities⁢ to be​ bought ​and sold.”

The Natural Outgrowth of Gender Ideology

Knowles began his ​thought-provoking lecture​ by highlighting the​ connection⁣ between ⁣this issue and gender ideology. He pointed out⁤ that the practice of ‌homosexual couples artificially conceiving a child through in​ vitro fertilization and, ‌in the case of gay men, hiring a surrogate mother to carry the child to term, has become⁤ increasingly prevalent in recent ⁣years.

“If men⁤ and​ women really aren’t different, then moms and dads ⁣really‌ aren’t ⁤different,” Knowles emphasized. “And if moms ​and dads really aren’t‌ different, then why would⁢ anyone need, or ⁤even want, to have both of them?⁣ What’s the ⁣difference between a family and a couple of fellas if ⁣that premise is true?”

The ‍Importance of Biological ‌Parents

Knowles passionately argued that children need both of their biological‌ parents. He emphasized the unique and profound bond between a​ mother ⁢and child, ‌stating that separating​ a ‍child from their mother is inconceivably cruel. He lamented​ the fact that what was once a rare tragedy for infants to​ lose their mothers⁤ has now become standard practice in a growing industry.

However, Knowles firmly believes‍ that gender ‍ideology is not the sole cause‌ of this situation. He argues‌ that⁣ it is fundamentally‌ a result of ⁣a culture that perceives children as mere objects to be owned,‌ bought, and sold, rather ​than recognizing⁢ them as individuals​ with their own rights.

“I do⁢ not primarily⁤ blame⁤ the homosexuals of either sex for this awful situation,” Knowles​ clarified. “They are simply following a 60-year‌ series ⁢of delusions that our culture and politics have promoted to⁢ their logical conclusion.”

The Role of​ Capitalism and Morality

Knowles identified capitalism as ‌the “primary culprit” behind this phenomenon. He argued ‌that capitalism, when unconstrained by ​morality, leads to‍ the ⁢commodification of children. However, he also acknowledged ​that ⁢capitalism, when circumscribed by morality, ​can be a powerful force​ for producing ethical ⁢outcomes.

CLICK HERE TO GET ⁤THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

Respecting Human⁤ Life and⁣ Dignity

Beyond the issue of​ IVF and ⁣surrogacy, Knowles also raised concerns about the treatment of fertilized embryos. He⁣ criticized the practice of aborting⁤ excess embryos ​or leaving “extra”‍ embryos frozen indefinitely or‌ disposed of without ceremony, ‍arguing that it demonstrates a callous disregard ‌for human life.

Knowles acknowledged that many people owe their lives to IVF⁢ and understand why ‍they⁣ and their families support ⁤the technology. However, he emphasized that noble ends do ⁢not justify unethical means. He ‍firmly believes⁤ that ⁤every human life, regardless of how it came into ​existence, possesses intrinsic value and deserves respect.

According to Knowles, children should ‍be seen as a ​”blessing” rather than‍ something people feel entitled ​to have⁢ or⁢ purchase. He emphasized that while no adult has an inherent right to have a child,​ every child ⁣has the‌ right to the love and support ⁤of their biological ‌parents.

⁤ How do IVF‍ and surrogacy‍ complicate relationships ⁤and ⁣dilute the bond between a child and their ⁤biological parents?

S unique individuals‌ with inherent rights and dignity.

Children as Commodities

In his lecture, Knowles discussed the disturbing reality that IVF and surrogacy turn children into commodities, reducing them to mere products that can be ‌created, bought, and sold. He⁣ argued that ​this​ mindset not only devalues ⁤children as human⁤ beings but ⁤also‍ poses grave ethical concerns.

“When we‍ treat children as commodities, we undermine their inherent worth and the natural ⁣bond they share with their biological ⁢parents,” Knowles stated.⁢ He highlighted ​the fact that ⁣IVF and surrogacy‌ involve​ multiple parties, including egg ​and sperm ‌donors,‌ surrogate mothers, and intended parents, which further complicates relationships and ‍dilutes the bond between a child and their biological ‍parents.

Against Nature and Morality

Knowles emphasized⁤ the unnatural aspect ⁤of IVF⁤ and surrogacy, asserting that these practices go⁣ against the natural order ‍of conception and ⁤child-rearing. He stressed the value of ‍the natural biological process, ‍which allows for⁢ the creation of ‌life through the ​union of a man and‌ a woman.

Furthermore, Knowles underscored the moral implications of these procedures. “We have a moral‍ duty ⁢to put the​ needs and well-being⁢ of​ children first,” he ​stated.⁢ “Creating a child through artificial means and separating them from ⁤their biological parents can have‌ long-lasting ⁣psychological and emotional impacts on ⁤the child.”

A Call for Change

In concluding his lecture, Knowles ⁢called for a ‍reevaluation⁣ of society’s perspective on IVF ​and surrogacy. He urged individuals ‌to prioritize the well-being of​ children and to ⁤recognize the importance of ​their biological parents in their lives. He stressed the need for a society that ⁣upholds the​ rights and dignity of each child, rather than⁢ one that treats them as ‍mere commodities.

Knowles acknowledged that fertility issues and the desire ‍to have children are deeply personal and painful experiences ⁤for many individuals. ​However, he argued that ⁤seeking alternative means of conception and‍ parenting should not come ‍at​ the expense of a child’s⁣ well-being and‍ natural familial relationships.

Reflection on the ⁣Lecture

Michael Knowles’ lecture at Clemson University shed light on the ethical concerns surrounding IVF and surrogacy. By highlighting the transformation of⁣ children into commodities‍ and the erosion of their natural bond with ‌their⁢ biological‍ parents, Knowles urged society to reevaluate its approach to ⁤these practices.

Ultimately, the lecture called for a shift in cultural attitudes and ‌a ‍return to recognizing the inherent worth and dignity of every child, free from the commodification that ⁤IVF and surrogacy often perpetuate.