Ketanji Brown Jackson Called an ‘Embarrassment’ for Using Social Media Slang in Birthright Citizenship Opinion

The article criticizes Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, highlighting her behavior and language in recent rulings. It condemns her for using social media slang like “understood the assignment” and “wait for it,” which the author finds inappropriate and humiliating for the court. The piece discusses her dissent in a case about birthright citizenship, where she invoked post-Civil war history in a manner deemed cringeworthy by the author and social media critics. Additionally, her dissent in a free speech case was criticized for being incoherent and referencing internet memes. The article also notes that Jackson, a Biden appointee chosen primarily for her race and gender, lacks the qualities expected of a Supreme Court justice, according to the author. it portrays her conduct and language as embarrassments to the judiciary and the nation.




Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has once again proven herself to be an utter embarrassment to the judicial branch and all those who came before her on the court.

Tuesday saw the Supreme Court rule in a 6-3 decision that President Donald Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship conflicts with the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

According to NBC News, Trump’s order, dated Jan. 20, 2025 — his first day in office after being sworn in for his second term — interprets the amendment to mean birthright citizenship extends to children of at least one parent who is a citizen or permanent resident, barring temporary visitors’ or illegal aliens’ children from obtaining citizenship.

Jackson was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Amy Coney Barrett. Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed that the order violated federal law, but not the Constitution. The amendment’s history dates back to Reconstruction, the period following the Civil War.

The intent was to grant citizenship to former slaves, but the majority now say it means anyone who comes into the country by any means whatsoever can give birth to a child who will automatically be, by default, a U.S. citizen.

In her concurring opinion, Brown Jackson decided to invoke the history of the postwar period, but did so in an incredibly cringeworthy manner unbecoming of the highest court in the land.

She wrote, “In the aftermath of the Civil War, those who championed the Fourteenth Amendment — both within and beyond Congress — understood the assignment.

“Their work product used ‘language that transcended race and region,’ and thereby ‘changed and broadened the meaning of freedom for all Americans.’”

If you’re completely confused about what it means when someone “understood the assignment,” you’re not alone. According to Yahoo! Life, “The slang term is a popular way to praise someone who is going above and beyond to do a good job. According to Urban Dictionary, ‘understood the assignment’ means, ‘a phrase used when someone is giving it 110% …Whether it’s what they’re doing, what they’re wearing, someone who is really on top of their s***.’”

What’s that phrase doing in a Supreme Court ruling? It’s humiliating the country, for one.

Political commentator Chaya Raichik, who writes as Libs of TikTok on social media platform X, remarked in a post Tuesday, “What an embarrassment to our country.”

Another user was equally ashamed, writing, “She literally never makes a shred of logical sense. It’s actually impressive how consistently incoherent she is.”

In Trump v CASA Inc., a case the court heard in June 2025 regarding whether lower court judges could issue universal injunctions, Jackson made just as much of a fool of herself by writing, “(wait for it)” in her dissent, a cliché phrase also used on social media to create anticipation.

It’s not just conservatives who are fed up with her. Fox News reported March 31 that even her fellow liberal Kagan rebuked Jackson — the lone dissenter — in an 8-1 ruling that declared Colorado could not enforce a “conversion therapy” ban on First Amendment grounds.

She said Jackson had failed to acknowledge case law that governs regulations on speech in the medical field. Kagan commented Jackson’s view “rests on reimagining — and in that way collapsing — the well-settled distinction between viewpoint-based and other content-based speech restrictions.”

Do not forget, Jackson is a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion hire. That’s not racist; it’s the reality of why former President Joe Biden chose her. Note Biden’s remarks, as reported by Time Magazine from 2022: “The person I will nominate will be someone with extraordinary qualifications, character, experience, and integrity, and that person will be the first Black woman ever nominated to the United States Supreme Court.”

Well, from her rulings and language, we know now he could have only chosen her for being a black woman; she certainly lacks all those other qualities.

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.






" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker