Kash Patel explains the Durham Report.

Former Trump Aide Kash Patel Challenges Integrity of DOJ and FBI in Durham Report

Former Trump administration aide and Justice Department (DOJ) official Kash Patel has given his reaction to the recently released Durham Report on Friday’s episode of Kash’s Corner on EpochTV. Patel’s assertions challenge the actions of the Hillary Clinton campaign, DOJ, and FBI, leading to intense debate and raising serious questions about the integrity of these institutions.

Clinton Campaign Fabricated Information Against Trump

According to Patel, the initial stage of the report reveals that the Clinton campaign engaged in fabricated information as part of their opposition research against then-candidate Donald Trump. He argued that once Trump won the election, the DOJ and FBI effectively continued where the campaign had left off.

• Patel highlights the controversial Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant obtained specifically for Carter Page, a Trump campaign adviser.
• The warrant targeted Page, but its “one-hop” provision potentially allowed for surveillance of the entire campaign.
• Patel asserts that the FBI and DOJ acted as the Russian assets ahead of the 2016 election, challenging the once-prevailing narrative surrounding the Trump–Russia collusion allegations.

Moreover, Patel asserted that the FBI and DOJ acted as the Russian assets ahead of the 2016 election—referring to a claim that challenges the once-prevailing narrative surrounding the Trump–Russia collusion allegations.

Thoroughness and Impartiality of Durham’s Inquiry Questioned

The former DOJ official went on to criticize Special Counsel John Durham’s refusal to bring in the FBI director and deputy director, who played instrumental roles in launching the investigation and signing what Patel refers to as “bogus warrants.” This omission raises questions about the thoroughness and impartiality of Durham’s inquiry.

“They didn’t have those facts because the DOJ and FBI lied, broke the law, violated their oath of office, and submitted fraudulent information they knew to be false,” Patel said. However, the former DoJ official is not optimistic that justice will be served.

There is no justification for Durham’s alleged inability to utilize the grand jury process and subpoena individuals, according to Patel. He dismissed Durham’s claim of not knowing how to perform these procedures, insisting that it is a basic function of a prosecutor.