Jury to Determine Giuliani’s Fate in Georgia Defamation Suit
Jury Orders Rudy Giuliani to Pay $150 Million in Damages for Defamation
A jury has determined that former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani must pay nearly $150 million in damages to two Georgia election workers for making defamatory statements about them after the 2020 election, according to NBC News.
U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell found Giuliani guilty of defaming Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss in August.
After a four-day trial and over nine hours of deliberation, a Washington jury reached a verdict awarding the two women a staggering $148 million in damages, as reported by NBC News.
The damages include $16,171,000 for defamation and $20 million for emotional distress to Freeman, along with $16,998,000 for defamation and $20 million for emotional distress to Moss.
Furthermore, the jury awarded both plaintiffs an additional $75 million in punitive damages, according to CNN.
BREAKING: An eight-person jury in Washington, D.C., has unanimously determined damages owed by Rudy Giuliani in defamation case brought by Georgia election workers Shaye Moss and Ruby Freeman.
Total: $148,169,000 million in compensatory and punitive damages
— Anna Bower (@AnnaBower) December 15, 2023
Giuliani made brief remarks to reporters as he exited court following the verdict.
He repeated his claim that there was widespread election fraud during the 2020 Presidential election.
“I know that my country had a President imposed on it by fraud,” he said. pic.twitter.com/NS6YfHrlhn
— Anna Bower (@AnnaBower) December 15, 2023
The women testified that they had received threats following Giuliani’s claims, according to CNN.
Do you agree with the jury’s decision?
- Yes
- No
Howell entered a default judgment against Giuliani that held him liable for defamation, civil conspiracy, and emotional distress after he “refused to comply with his discovery obligations,” as stated in the August ruling.
“Donning a cloak of victimization may play well on a public stage to certain audiences, but in a court of law, this performance has served only to subvert the normal process of discovery in a straightforward defamation case, with the concomitant necessity of repeated court intervention,” Howell wrote in the opinion.
Giuliani told reporters outside the D.C. courthouse that he intends to appeal the decision, according to NBC News.
The 79-year-old Republican was a federal prosecutor before becoming mayor of New York in 1994.
He gained recognition for his leadership in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline, and their DCNF affiliation.
For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
The post Jury Decides Rudy Giuliani’s Fate in Georgia Defamation Case appeared first on The Western Journal.
What were the specific statements made by Giuliani that led to the defamation case, and how did they impact the election officials involved?
T=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>Dominion Voting Systems in the same case, after the company failed to respond to the lawsuit filed by the two election workers, according to NBC News. The judge awarded Dominion $1.3 billion in damages, making it the largest defamation verdict in history.
This verdict against Giuliani comes as a significant blow to the former Trump attorney’s reputation and legal standing. Giuliani, once known as “America’s Mayor” for his leadership during the September 11 attacks, has faced increasing scrutiny and legal challenges in recent years.
The defamation case stemmed from Giuliani’s statements made in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, in which he repeatedly claimed widespread voter fraud had occurred. Freeman and Moss, who worked as election officials in Georgia, were at the center of Giuliani’s claims.
The jury’s decision to award $148 million in compensatory and punitive damages to the two women sends a strong message that false and defamatory statements will not be tolerated. It serves as a reminder that individuals in positions of power and influence must be held accountable for their words and actions.
Giuliani has consistently defended his claims of widespread voter fraud, despite numerous courts dismissing the allegations and the Department of Justice finding no evidence to support them. His repetition of these claims even after the trial verdict demonstrates a refusal to accept the reality of the situation.
While the jury’s decision has been backed by many who believe in the importance of accountability and truth, there are those who disagree. Some argue that the damages awarded are excessive and could have a chilling effect on free speech. They believe that individuals should be allowed to express their opinions, even if they are controversial or false.
However, it is crucial to differentiate between expressing opinions and spreading false information that can harm individuals and undermine the integrity of the democratic process. The purpose of defamation laws is to strike a balance between protecting free speech and safeguarding individuals from reputational harm.
The damages awarded in this case reflect the severity of the harm caused by Giuliani’s statements. Freeman and Moss testified that they faced threats and harassment as a direct result of Giuliani’s claims. The monetary compensation is intended to provide some measure of justice and help them recover from the emotional distress they endured.
It is important to note that Giuliani has the right to appeal the verdict, and it remains to be seen how this case will ultimately conclude. However, the outcome of this trial sends a clear message that defamatory statements will not be taken lightly, even when made by individuals in positions of power.
In a society that values truth, accountability, and the democratic process, it is crucial to hold individuals responsible for their words and actions. The jury’s decision to award $150 million in damages to Freeman and Moss sets a precedent for future cases involving defamation and reinforces the importance of upholding the truth.
Ultimately, it is the responsibility of each individual to critically evaluate the information they consume and exercise caution when sharing or amplifying unverified claims. It is our collective duty to protect the integrity of our democratic systems and ensure that truth and justice prevail.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
