Realtors and brokerages found guilty of conspiring to inflate commissions, ordered to pay home-sellers $1.78 billion.
A Landmark Verdict: Real Estate Giants Found Guilty of Inflating Commissions
In a groundbreaking decision, a Kansas City, Missouri, jury has delivered a resounding blow to three major players in the residential real estate industry. The jury found the National Association of Realtors (NAR), HomeServices of America, and Keller Williams Realty guilty of conspiring to inflate commissions, resulting in a staggering $1.78 billion in damages.
The trial, which lasted over two weeks, captivated audiences as testimonies were heard from key figures in the industry, including Bob Goldberg, CEO of NAR, Gino Blefari, President and CEO of HomeServices of America, and Gary Keller, co-founder and CEO of Keller Williams Realty. Missouri home-sellers who dared to challenge these industry giants also took the stand.
The plaintiffs and their attorney made a compelling case, accusing NAR and the corporate brokerages of knowingly violating antitrust rules by colluding to require home-sellers to pay inflated fees to brokers. Typically, these fees would range from five to six percent of the home sales price, with half going to the buyer’s broker. The alleged collusion aimed to keep buyer’s broker commissions artificially high.
Related Stories
The heart of the alleged conspiracy revolved around NAR’s Buyer Broker Commission Rule, a mandatory regulation that required brokers to offer a non-negotiable buyer’s broker compensation when listing a property. This rule effectively compelled home-sellers to offer higher amounts, as buyer’s brokers were less likely to show homes with lower commission offers. The plaintiffs argued that this collusion artificially maintained inflated buyer’s broker commissions, despite the diminishing importance of their role in the age of online home searches.
While the defendants vehemently denied any wrongdoing, claiming that there is no standard 6 percent commission and that no conspiracy existed, the jury sided with the plaintiffs. The class-action lawsuit, filed in 2019 on behalf of all home-sellers who paid broker commissions to the accused companies in the past four years, initially included RE/MAX and Anywhere Real Estate as defendants. However, both settled before the trial concluded.
Before the verdict is finalized, Judge Stephen Bough of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri must issue a final ruling. In the worst-case scenario for the defendants, the Buyer Broker Commission Rule could be banned, preventing home sellers and sellers’ brokers from predetermining buyers’ broker commission rates.
Unsurprisingly, the NAR plans to appeal the verdict, with their spokesperson emphasizing their commitment to advocating for homeownership and prioritizing consumer interests. HomeServices also intends to appeal, expressing concerns about the potential consequences for buyers and sellers in an already challenging real estate market. Keller Williams, too, expressed disappointment and hinted at exploring avenues of appeal.
What impact do government regulations have on home affordability, according to the hearing witnesses?
Hearing Witnesses on Impact of Government Regulations on Home Affordability
10/28/2023
Real Estate Market Update: October 2023
10/28/2023
The jury’s verdict sends a clear message that the real estate industry must be held accountable for its practices. The inflated commissions have long burdened home-sellers, who have been forced to pay excessive fees, often to the detriment of their own financial well-being. This landmark verdict not only provides financial compensation to the affected sellers but also serves as a deterrent for future collusion and unfair business practices.
During the trial, evidence was presented to show that the defendants had engaged in a concerted effort to maintain the status quo and prevent any disruption to the existing commission structure. Testimonies revealed secret meetings and communications among the defendants, where strategies were discussed on how to control real estate agent commissions, specifically by keeping buyer’s broker commissions high.
According to the plaintiffs, the inflated commissions resulted in higher home prices, as sellers passed on the burden of the fees to buyers. This not only affected individual home-buyers but also had a broader impact on the housing market, making homeownership less attainable for many prospective buyers. The verdict serves as a crucial step towards addressing this issue and ensuring fair and transparent practices in the real estate industry.
The National Association of Realtors, as the leading trade association in the industry, has a responsibility to uphold ethical standards and protect the interests of both buyers and sellers. The jury’s finding of guilt highlights the failure of the organization to fulfill this responsibility. Moving forward, it is imperative for NAR to implement necessary reforms to regain the trust of its members and the public.
The impact of this verdict extends beyond the defendants in this case. It sends a strong message to other real estate companies operating across the country that unjust business practices will not go unnoticed or unpunished. The verdict sets a precedent for future cases and reinforces the importance of fair competition and consumer protection in the real estate market.
It is now up to the court to determine the appropriate distribution of the $1.78 billion in damages awarded to the plaintiffs. This decision will have significant consequences for all parties involved and may prompt further changes in the way real estate transactions are conducted.
This landmark verdict has the potential to reshape the real estate industry and bring about much-needed reforms. It exposes a long-standing practice that has detrimentally impacted home-sellers and buyers alike. The hope is that this verdict serves as a turning point, leading to a more transparent and fair real estate market for all parties involved.
As the real estate giants reel from the jury’s decision, industry observers and stakeholders eagerly await the unfolding consequences and the potential transformation of the residential real estate landscape.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
