Judge rules against Trump in Minnesota sanctuary city lawsuit
A federal judge has limited the Trump administration’s ability to override state immigration regulations in Minnesota, marking a setback for federal authority. The administration had sued the state and local authorities over policies that restrict cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). However, Judge Eric C. Tostrud dismissed the case, citing the 10th Amendment, which grants states authority over how local officials perform their duties and prevents federal overreach. The judge clarified that the disputed policies do not command or prohibit federal actions but regulate local officials’ responsibilities. The administration argued that these policies infringe upon the federal government’s supremacy, especially regarding access to driver’s license data and enforcement of immigration laws. Tostrud’s ruling emphasizes the constitutional limits of federal power in local matters related to immigration enforcement.
A federal judge blocked the Trump administration on Monday from overruling state immigration regulations in Minnesota, marking a blow for federal power.
The Trump administration filed a lawsuit in September against the Twin Cities, Hennepin County, and the state over “sanctuary city policies” that limit local law enforcement’s collaboration with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. U.S. District Judge Eric C. Tostrud, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, dismissed the complaint this week, describing the government’s attempt to preempt local regulation as a violation of the 10th Amendment. He said the disputed policies merely “regulate how state and local officials perform their duties.”
Recommended Stories
“They do not command the federal government or its contractors to act. They do not forbid the federal government or its contractors from acting,” Tostrud wrote in court filings. They do not control how the federal government or its contractors undertake their work. Rather, they regulate how state and local officials perform their duties.”
“The challenged provisions do not single the federal government out for less favorable treatment, at least not in any sense that shows an intergovernmental immunity violation,” he continued.
The Trump administration has argued that the challenged policies, which include state statutes limiting access to driver’s license and vehicle registration data for immigration enforcement, as well as local ordinances barring state officers from enforcing federal immigration law, violate the supremacy clause of the Constitution, which states that federal law must be supreme over state and local law.
ICE SITS FROZEN AMID TRUMP-MULLIN TRAFFIC STOP DEBACLE
“Minnesota officials are jeopardizing the safety of their own citizens by allowing illegal aliens to circumvent the legal process,” then-Attorney General Pam Bondi said last year, as the Justice Department filed the lawsuit.
However, Tostrud ruled that forcing local jurisdictions to comply with federal requests to hold a deportation target for pickup, among other policies, violates state power as described in the 10th Amendment.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
