Judge denies Sen. Menendez’s claim of ‘unconstitutional’ search warrants in bribery case
OAN’s Brooke Mallory
6:18 PM – Monday, March 4, 2024
U.S. Democrat Senator Bob Menendez’s argument regarding the search warrants involved in his case being “unconstitutional”—while investigators cited charges of corruption and discovered gold bars and cash at his New Jersey home—was dismissed by a federal judge on Monday.
Judge Sidney H. Stein decided on Monday that the Democrat’s repeated 2022 email account searches and house searches were lawfully requested and executed.
Nevertheless, the senator’s legal defense claimed that the warrants were “riddled with material misrepresentation and omissions that deceived the authorizing magistrate judge.”
However, according to Stein, there was no purposeful or significant omission in the warrants, and a hearing was not required to investigate the allegations in greater detail. Additionally, he rejected the appeals to search warrants made by one of the three businessmen accused in the case that also led to Menendez’s wife’s arrest.
A last warrant related to cell phone records was issued in September of last year, and the other warrants were issued between January and July of 2022.
During a search of his residence in June 2022, prosecutors claimed that they found over $480,000 in cash and over $100,000 worth of gold bars, most of which were concealed in clothes, closets, and a large safe.
When police first revealed allegations in September, photographs of cash stashed in envelopes inside jackets with Menendez’s name on them were included in the indictment.
Investigators also claimed to have seen Menendez’s Google search regarding the price of a “kilo of gold,” as well as the DNA of a man who, according to the prosecution, bribed him with an envelope containing thousands of dollars.
Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts
Supreme Court blocks Colorado’s Trump Insurrection ban, Texas will start arresting Illegal Aliens and Nikki Haley wins DC
Super Tuesday is only hours away. Both Republicans and Democrats will have elections in 15 states.
On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of 45th President Donald Trump in the Colorado ballot case, saying Trump must appear on the ballot.
Super Tuesday is on March 5th. Voters in California will head to the polls. This comes as the GOP is seeing a bump in registered voters in the state.
Apple is betting that the more powerful models would attract consumers looking to upgrade to AI-powered PCs.
Elon Musk alleges a breach of contract and a departure from the original mission to develop AI for humanity’s benefit.
The stock market’s interest in AI is on the rise, fueled by Nvidia’s stunning rally and potential impact on various sectors.
UnitedHealth Group faces a major data breach as hackers claim to have stolen millions of sensitive records.
rnrn
What were the assertions made by Menendez’s defense team regarding the flawed warrants, and how did Judge Stein rule on these claims?
Nbox.
The charges against Menendez and the subsequent dismissal of his argument raise important questions about the legal system and the rights of individuals under investigation. The senator’s defense team asserted that the warrants used in his case were flawed and did not provide accurate information to the authorizing judge. They claimed that the omission of certain details deceived the judge and rendered the warrants unconstitutional.
However, Judge Sidney H. Stein disagreed with these assertions and ruled that the warrants were lawfully requested and executed. He determined that there were no intentional or significant omissions in the warrants and that a hearing to investigate the allegations in greater detail was not necessary.
The judge’s ruling also included a rejection of the appeals made by one of the businessmen accused in the case. This businessman had also challenged the validity of the search warrants. Therefore, the decision by Judge Stein seems to support the prosecution’s case against Menendez and affirms the legitimacy of the investigation and subsequent searches.
The discovery of gold bars and cash at Menendez’s residence during the search adds another layer of complexity to the case. Prosecutors alleged that the cash and gold bars were hidden throughout the house, concealed in various places such as clothes, closets, and a large safe. The photographs presented in the indictment, showing cash hidden inside jackets with Menendez’s name, further substantiate these claims.
In addition, investigators reported finding evidence of Menendez’s online searches related to the price of gold. This information, coupled with the alleged DNA evidence of a briber, further bolsters the prosecution’s case against the senator.
The dismissal of Menendez’s argument and the judge’s ruling highlight the importance of thorough and accurate warrant applications. It underscores the need for investigators and law enforcement agencies to provide complete and honest information to the authorizing judge. Any misrepresentations or omissions may not only jeopardize the integrity of the investigation but also infringe upon the rights of the individuals being investigated.
This case serves as a reminder that the justice system must operate within the bounds of the law and ensure that individuals’ constitutional rights are protected. It emphasizes the need for transparency, accountability, and adherence to proper legal procedures. The dismissal of Menendez’s argument should not be seen as an exoneration or conviction but rather as a testament to the functioning of the legal system and its commitment to upholding justice.
As this case continues to unfold, it is crucial to monitor the developments and examine the evidence presented by both the prosecution and the defense. Only through a fair and thorough examination of the facts can a just outcome be achieved. In the end, the truth shall prevail, and justice will be served.
(Note: The provided text cannot be parsed as it contains HTML tags and encoding information. Please provide the plain text for the article.)
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
