Judge overturns primary election due to ‘shocking’ evidence of fraud.
A Shocking Turn of Events: Judge Overturns Primary Election in Connecticut
In a stunning ruling, a judge in Connecticut has overturned a primary election, citing “shocking” evidence presented in court. The election in question was the Democrat primary for the mayoral race in Bridgeport, which saw thousands of absentee ballots cast. Candidate John Gomes raised concerns about fraudulent ballots, and it was revealed that some of the ballots were indeed cast unlawfully.
Connecticut state law allows for absentee voting but imposes strict rules, including the requirement for individuals distributing more than five absentee applications to register with the town clerk. Wanda Geter-Pataky and Eneida Martinez, supporters of the party-endorsed Mayor Joe Ganim, were caught on video dropping off multiple absentee ballots without being registered as distributors or designated by voters to do so.
The judge, William Clark, stated that the conduct captured on video constituted multiple violations of state law governing absentee voting. As a result, he declared the primary election results invalid and ordered a new election to be held.
Related Stories
- ea_src=author_manual&ea_med=related_stories“>Florida County Supervisor of Elections Placed Under State Oversight for Mail-In Ballot Violations – 10/30/2023
- Body of Man Who Was Missing After Fishing Boat Sank Off Connecticut Is Recovered – 10/25/2023
Mayor Joe Ganim, who has served multiple terms and previously faced corruption charges, denied any involvement in the fraudulent scheme. He expressed his disapproval of actions that undermine the integrity of the electoral process and city property.
The judge emphasized the significance of the video evidence, describing it as “shocking” and highlighting the violations committed by partisan actors. He rejected the argument that the primary should not be overturned due to the absence of testimony from the voters themselves.
John Gomes, the challenger in the primary, welcomed the ruling and emphasized that justice had been served for the people of Bridgeport. The city has yet to comment on the decision, and Mayor Ganim is considering whether to appeal.
Connecticut Secretary of State Stephanie Thomas expressed satisfaction with the ruling and emphasized the need for policies to strengthen the election system, such as drop box surveillance and voter education.
Questionable Stamp
In addition to the fraudulent ballots, John Gomes also raised concerns about the stamp used by city officials to process the absentee ballots. The stamp did not contain the required town clerk’s signature, leading to doubts about its validity. The clerk’s office claimed that the signature on the stamp was damaged and unusable, resulting in the use of a generic stamp instead.
The judge ruled that despite the missing signature, the stamp was in “substantial compliance” with state law. Invalidating all absentee ballots would have unfairly disenfranchised voters who were not at fault for the stamp issue.
How does the overturning of the primary election in Bridgeport restore faith in the electoral process for the citizens of Bridgeport
://www.theepochtimes.com/us/michigan-court-rules-against-democrat-attorney-generals-effort-to-extend-mail-in-ballot-deadline-5580962?ea_src=author_manual&ea_med=related_stories”>Michigan Court Rules Against Democrat Attorney General’s Effort to Extend Mail-In Ballot Deadline - 11/07/2023
This case highlights the importance of upholding the integrity of our electoral process and ensuring that every vote counts. The judge’s decision to overturn the primary election in Bridgeport sends a strong message that election fraud will not be tolerated, regardless of political affiliation. While voter fraud has always been a concern, the prevalence of mail-in voting amid the COVID-19 pandemic has raised additional worries about the potential for abuse in the electoral system. This ruling serves as a reminder that safeguards must be in place to prevent and detect fraudulent activity. It is commendable that John Gomes and his campaign team were diligent in challenging the irregularities they observed during the primary election. Their commitment to a fair and honest electoral process should serve as an inspiration to others who value the democratic principles upon which our nation was founded. The judge’s decision to order a new election not only rectifies the injustice done to the candidates who competed in the primary, but also restores faith in the electoral process for the citizens of Bridgeport. By holding a new election with proper oversight and strict adherence to the law, the people of Bridgeport can regain confidence in the fairness and legitimacy of the choosing their next mayor. Furthermore, this ruling serves as a warning to those who may try to manipulate the voting process in future elections. The consequences of engaging in unlawful activities, such as ballot tampering or illegal distribution of absentee applications, have been made clear. The court’s decision reinforces the need for heightened vigilance and enforcement to protect the integrity of our elections. Ultimately, the overturning of the primary election in Bridgeport illustrates that our judicial system plays a crucial role in upholding democratic values. Judges, like William Clark, who carefully review the evidence presented before them and make decisions based on the rule of law, are essential in maintaining the integrity of our electoral process. As we move forward, it is important that we continue to prioritize election integrity and work to improve the safeguards in place to prevent fraud. Additionally, voter education and engagement are key in ensuring that individuals are aware of their rights and responsibilities when participating in the electoral process. The shocking turn of events in Connecticut serves as a stark reminder of the importance of preserving the integrity of our elections. Let us learn from this case and take the necessary steps to protect and strengthen our democratic system for future generations.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
