The Western Journal

Judge disqualifies Trump-appointed leadership in NJ US attorney’s office

A federal judge ruled that the leadership of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in New Jersey, currently overseen by three senior lawyers, was unlawfully appointed and thus invalid. the three-Philip Lamparello, Ari Fontecchio, and Jordan Fox-had been installed to share duties after alina Habba stepped down as acting U.S. Attorney, an arrangement Brann previously found lacked authority for Habba herself. The ruling concluded that dividing the office’s leadership among three people violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. The decision came in a case brought by defendants including Raheel Naviwala, who warned that continuing to operate without a properly appointed U.S. Attorney could jeopardize prosecutions and possibly lead to dismissals. Brann stayed the ruling pending appeal, allowing the trio to remain in place temporarily, while Habba criticized the ruling as an overreach into the executive branch.


Judge disqualifies Trump-appointed leadership in New Jersey US attorney’s office

A federal judge ruled Monday that the three attorneys currently leading the U.S. Attorney’s Office in New Jersey are serving unlawfully, escalating the Trump administration’s long-running dispute over who can legally run the federal prosecutor’s office in the state.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann issued a 130-page opinion disqualifying senior counsel Philip Lamparello, executive assistant U.S. attorney Ari Fontecchio, and special attorney Jordan Fox. The trio had been installed to divide the responsibilities of the U.S. attorney role after former acting U.S. Attorney Alina Habba stepped down in December.

Alina Habba, President Donald Trump’s pick to be the interim U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, speaks with reporters outside the White House, Wednesday, March 26, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

Brann, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, is a Pennsylvania judge who was assigned to weigh the matter to avoid conflicts of interest among New Jersey’s federal judges. He stayed his ruling pending appeal, meaning the three attorneys may temporarily continue overseeing the office.

The decision marks the second time in less than a year that Brann has ruled that the office’s leadership was unlawfully appointed. Last summer, he determined that Habba, a former personal lawyer for President Donald Trump, lacked legal authority to serve as acting U.S. attorney. An appeals court later upheld that ruling.

After Habba’s departure, Attorney General Pam Bondi appointed Lamparello, Fontecchio, and Fox to collectively handle the responsibilities of the office. Brann ruled Monday that dividing the position among three officials violated the Constitution’s Appointments Clause.

“The Government assembles a convoluted patchwork of statutory cross-references to craft a leadership structure that it contends can do anything a United States Attorney can, without being a United States Attorney,” Brann wrote.

The case was brought by two defendants challenging their prosecutions, including Raheel Naviwala, a Florida man convicted of defrauding Medicare and other insurers of roughly $100 million.

DOJ COULD SOOK ASK SUPREME COURT TO CONSIDER LEGAL BATTLE OVER TRUMP-APPOINTED US ATTORNEYS

Brann warned that continuing to operate the office without a properly appointed U.S. attorney could jeopardize criminal prosecutions.

“Any further attempts to unlawfully fill the office will result in dismissals of pending cases,” he wrote, cautioning that “scores of dangerous criminals could have their cases dismissed or convictions eventually reversed” if prosecutors lack legal authority.

Habba criticized the ruling on social media, calling it “ridiculous” and accusing the court of overstepping into the executive branch.

“The unconstitutionality of this complete overreach into the Executive Branch, time and time again, will not succeed,” Habba wrote. “They would rather have no U.S. Attorney than safety for the people of NJ.”



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker