Inside Democrats’ Newest Election Takeover Scheme: Report Unmasks ‘Dark Money’ Group You’ve Probably Never Heard Of

After flooding local election offices with private money to alter election operations in key battleground states ahead of the 2020 presidential contest, Democrat-aligned groups have been looking for new ways to take over America’s future elections — and a new bombshell report reveals just how they plan to do it.

The shocking video was released by the Honest Elections Project and John Locke Foundation. report This article explains how you can get the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence — a self-professed “nonpartisan collaborative” They claim to be able to bring together elected officials with the stated goal, “Developing” “a set of shared standards and values” — is actually a venture by left-wing nonprofit groups to “systematically influence every aspect of election administration” Democrat-backed Voting Policies in Local Election Offices across the Country.

The Alliance’s efforts are similar to those orchestrated by groups such as the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which, after receiving $400 million Mark Zuckerberg, Meta CEO, invested millions of dollars in local election offices to improve the way elections were conducted leading up to the 2020 presidential campaign. The Federalist has previously reported reportedThese are the best “Zuckbucks” These grants were used for the expansion of unsecure election protocols, such as mail-in voter registration and ballot drop boxes. The grants were heavily biased towards Democrat-majority countries, essentially making this a huge Democrat get out-the-vote operation.

CTCL is, unsurprisingly, one of the most important groups partnered With the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence

While CTCL’s actions in the 2020 election were intrusive enough to provoke 24 states to pass laws banning or restricting Zuckbucks, the Alliance seeks to take CTCL’s election-interfering tactics a step further. Membership and grant agreements obtained by HEP, the Alliance’s “unusual and complex structure” This appears to be “designed to thwart meaningful oversight and accountability.”

“For instance, after the Alliance had recruited its first cohort of members it announced plans to begin charging offices to join. However, the Alliance also created ‘scholarships’ to cover those membership costs, which are instantly converted into ‘credits’ that member offices can use to buy services from CTCL and other Alliance partners,” The HEP report is available here. “As a result, offices receive access to funds they can spend exclusively on services provided by left-wing companies and nonprofits, entirely outside normal public funding channels.”

In other words, existing Zuckbucks bans wouldn’t necessarily prevent local election departments from contracting with the Alliance to obtain services ranging “from ‘legal’ and ‘political’ consulting to public relations and guidance on recruitment and training.”

Such services are already being utilized in places such as Brunswick County, North Carolina, where the locality’s board of elections director used “talking points and hyperlinks provided by the Alliance” to push back against criticism of the county’s acceptance of CTCL funds. In a series of emails obtained by HEP via public records requests, Board of Elections Director Sara LaVere is documented defending the acceptance of the grants and admitting that The Elections Group — an Alliance partner — assisted her in writing articles published