the epoch times

Illinois judge denies dismissal of case against parade shooting suspect’s father.

Judge Refuses to Dismiss Case Against Father in Chicago Shooting

A judge in​ Chicago has made⁢ a crucial⁤ decision in the case against ⁢a ⁢father who ⁣allegedly helped his son‌ obtain a gun license, three years before the son went on to fatally‌ shoot seven people at a​ Fourth⁣ of⁤ July parade in 2022. The judge rejected arguments that the‌ charges against Robert ‌Crimo Jr. ⁤were based on ​an unconstitutionally vague law and⁢ that the prosecution had ⁢exceeded the statute of limitations. As ​a result, Crimo Jr.’s trial will proceed as scheduled on November ​6.

Related Stories

The judge took three weeks to consider his decision and announced it during a hearing in Waukegan. Despite the⁤ hopes of ‍the‍ defense, the judge ruled against​ dismissing the case. Robert Crimo Jr. ‍remained composed throughout the‍ hearing, showing⁣ no visible⁣ reaction to the judge’s decision.

Robert E. Crimo Jr. waits for⁣ an appearance at the Lake County Courthouse in Waukegan, Ill., on ⁢Aug. ​28, 2023. (Nam Y. Huh/Pool via AP ​Photo)

Crimo⁤ Jr. pleaded not guilty to⁤ seven counts of reckless conduct, ‍each count carrying a maximum three-year prison term. Prosecutors alleged that​ he assisted his ‌son in obtaining ​a‍ gun license,⁣ despite‌ the son’s history of ‌making threats. The⁢ defense ‌argued that the state law used ⁣to charge Crimo Jr. is too vague​ and fails to define what actions constitute reckless conduct. They also claimed that signing⁤ a truthful ⁣affidavit should not be considered a criminal act.

However, Judge Strickland disagreed,⁢ stating that ‌the law is ‌specific enough and‌ similar to other constitutional laws. He emphasized that it only‍ applies to reckless conduct causing great bodily‌ harm. ⁢Meanwhile, the‍ son, Robert ⁣Crimo⁢ III, faces multiple charges, including first-degree murder and attempted murder, but no trial date has been set.

Prosecutors maintain that the father’s sponsorship of⁣ his son’s gun license⁤ application ‌in 2019 forms the basis of their​ case. They allege that the son had a history of violent​ behavior and threats. The defense also ⁣argued that the statute of limitations had ​expired, but the judge ruled that the timeline should be counted​ from ‌the⁢ day of the shooting,⁢ not from Crimo Jr.’s signature on the application.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker