Illinois experiments with cashless bail, but finds it breeds lawlessness
In July, the Illinois Supreme Court upheld the state’s controversial law eliminating cash bail. Chris Southwood, the president of the Illinois Fraternal Order of Police, warned that this decision would result in dangerous criminals being released and committing crimes again shortly after. And he was right.
But it doesn’t take a soothsayer to see that the situation is only getting worse. Chicago Alderman Raymond Lopez, a rare Democrat speaking out against the end of cash bail, expressed his concerns about innocent people being hunted down like prey. Criminals are taking advantage of the new law, knowing that they won’t be held on bond for crimes like robbery, burglary, and assault.
One example of this is Jason Lee Willie, a transgender-identified individual who threatened to shoot or sexually abuse children. Willie referenced a previous school shooter and made disturbing comments online. Despite the seriousness of the allegations, Willie was released on non-monetary bond after being arrested. This is just one example of the two systems of justice at play.
Two Systems of Justice
Willie, a 47-year-old man from Nashville, Illinois, was charged with 14 federal felony counts of interstate communication of a threat to injure. According to the criminal complaint, he declared his intentions to harm children while on video in online chatrooms. Law enforcement officials say Willie referenced a previous school shooter who targeted a Nashville private elementary school.
Willie made several comments about sexually assaulting children and made racist and violent remarks about black people. Despite these disturbing statements, Willie pleaded not guilty to all counts.
The U.S. District Court ruled that Willie must be detained pending trial because there is clear and convincing evidence that he poses a threat to the safety of others. However, this was not the case when Willie was initially arrested in Illinois. He was released on non-monetary bond, despite the disturbing threats he had made.
Released After Past Threats
Willie was first apprehended in Perry County, Illinois, after making disturbing threats towards schools and local children. Despite the seriousness of the allegations, he was released on non-monetary bond just two days after being booked on a charge of resisting arrest. The charges related to the threats were dropped due to a lack of evidence.
This case highlights the flaws in the Illinois law eliminating cash bail. Dangerous individuals are being released back into the community, putting innocent people at risk. It’s clear that changes need to be made to ensure the safety and accountability of the criminal justice system.
The Impact of Illinois’ SAFE-T Act on Law Enforcement and Public Safety
Illinois’ criminal justice system has undergone significant changes with the implementation of the SAFE-T Act. This groundbreaking legislation, which eliminated cash bail, has sparked intense debate and raised concerns about its impact on law enforcement and public safety.
Sheriff Howard, in a recent interview, expressed his frustration with the new law, stating that it has tied the hands of law enforcement. He highlighted a specific case where a suspect, Willie, who was charged with resisting arrest, is unlikely to face jail time due to the provisions of the SAFE-T Act.
Under the new law, suspects like Willie are simply brought in for booking, processing, and biometrics, and then released with a court date. The responsibility of handling the case is now solely in the hands of the courts. This shift in the system has raised concerns about the potential for increased lawlessness.
However, proponents of the SAFE-T Act argue that it is a necessary step towards creating a fairer system for the systematically oppressed, particularly low-income and minority defendants. State Rep. Jehan Gordon-Booth emphasizes that the reforms aim to base release decisions on a public safety assessment rather than a defendant’s access to cash.
Despite these arguments, critics believe that the rewrite of Illinois’ criminal justice system prioritizes criminals over law enforcement and public safety. They argue that the legislation limits judges’ discretion and fails to consider the alarming rise in crime rates, particularly in Chicago.
The National Trend of Zero Bail and Social Justice Reforms
The issue of zero bail and other social justice reforms is not unique to Illinois. Leftist-led cities across the country have experimented with similar policies, leading to mixed results.
A study conducted by the Yolo County district attorney’s office in California found that suspects released on zero bail had a significantly higher rate of recidivism compared to those required to pay cash bail. The study revealed that individuals released on zero bail were rearrested for 163% more crimes than those released on bail.
- Arrested individuals released on zero bail reoffended at an average rate that was 70% higher than arrestees who posted bail.
- The average recidivism rate for those released on zero bail was 78% over 18 months, while the average recidivism rate for those released on bail was only 46%.
- Individuals released on zero bail committed new felonies 90% more often than those who posted bail.
- Individuals released on zero bail committed new misdemeanors 123% more often than those who posted bail.
These findings highlight the potential negative consequences of eliminating bail as a tool for courts. Yolo County District Attorney Jeff Reisig argues that victimization increases and public safety is compromised when bail is eliminated.
Proponents of zero bail policies, however, point to studies that suggest minimal effects on recidivism. Critics argue that these analyses fail to consider the realities faced by law enforcement officials on the ground. They emphasize that cities implementing cashless bail and other lenient policies continue to struggle with high crime rates.
As the debate rages on, it remains to be seen how the SAFE-T Act and similar reforms will shape the future of criminal justice in Illinois and beyond.
The Blue City Murder Problem: Democrats and Crime
A recent report titled ”The Blue City Murder Problem” revealed a startling fact: 27 out of the top 30 crime-ridden cities are governed by Democrats. This report, authored by Charles Stimson, Zack Smith, and Kevin D. Dayaratna from the esteemed Heritage Foundation, sheds light on the devastating consequences of the Left’s soft-on-crime policies.
According to the report, Democrats are well aware of the havoc their policies have wreaked in the cities where they have been implemented. The authors emphasize the detrimental impact of these policies on law enforcement and communities.
The Impact of Illinois’ SAFE-T Act and the Elimination of Cash Bail
One example that highlights the challenges faced by law enforcement and communities is the case of Treyshawn McLaren from Henderson, Illinois. McLaren was charged with aggravated battery to his 3-month-old child, aggravated domestic battery, and endangering the child’s life and safety. Shockingly, the judge placed McLaren on supervised release, denying the prosecution’s request to detain him pending trial.
It is worth noting that McLaren had previously been arrested on drugs and firearms charges in an FBI bust. This lenient treatment of criminals is a direct result of the statewide SAFE-T Act and the elimination of cash bail in Illinois.
Law enforcement officer Southwood expresses his concern, stating that criminals are quick to seize opportunities. He criticizes the decisions made by elected representatives, which have effectively handcuffed the police, released felons without bail, and disarmed law-abiding citizens. This dangerous combination creates the perfect recipe for lawlessness, allowing crooks across the state to embark on a crime spree.
What does the study conducted by the Yolo County district attorney’s office in California suggest about the relationship between eliminating cash bail and recidivism rates
W these social justice reforms will ultimately impact law enforcement and public safety. The experiences of cities like Chicago and Yolo County provide valuable insights into the potential consequences of eliminating cash bail.
While the intention behind the SAFE-T Act and other similar reforms is to create a fairer system for low-income and minority defendants, concerns persist regarding the impact on public safety. Critics argue that these policies prioritize the rights of criminals over those of law enforcement and innocent citizens.
Chicago Alderman Raymond Lopez, a Democrat who has spoken out against the end of cash bail, has expressed concerns about innocent people being preyed upon by criminals who are taking advantage of the new law. The case of Jason Lee Willie, a transgender individual charged with threatening to harm children, illustrates the potential dangers of releasing dangerous individuals back into the community.
Similarly, a study conducted by the Yolo County district attorney’s office in California revealed that suspects released on zero bail had a significantly higher rate of recidivism compared to those required to pay cash bail. This suggests that eliminating bail as a tool for courts may compromise public safety and contribute to an increase in crime rates.
Proponents of zero bail policies argue that studies showing minimal effects on recidivism support their position. However, critics argue that these analyses fail to acknowledge the challenges faced by law enforcement officials on the ground and the reality of high crime rates in cities implementing cashless bail policies.
As the debate surrounding cash bail and social justice reforms continues, it is crucial to consider the potential consequences for law enforcement and public safety. While the aim of these reforms is commendable, measures must be taken to ensure that dangerous individuals are not released back into the community, putting innocent lives at risk. Balancing the rights of defendants with the need for public safety will be a critical task for lawmakers and criminal justice system stakeholders moving forward.
In conclusion, the implementation of the SAFE-T Act in Illinois has brought significant changes to the state’s criminal justice system. While proponents argue that these reforms promote fairness and address systemic inequalities, concerns persist regarding their impact on law enforcement and public safety. The experiences of cities like Chicago and Yolo County demonstrate the potential dangers of eliminating cash bail, including an increase in recidivism rates and compromises to public safety. Moving forward, it is essential to strike a balance between the rights of defendants and the need for a secure society. Further evaluation and adjustments to these reforms may be necessary to ensure the safety and accountability of the criminal justice system.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
