Biden’s ghostwriter tried to hide evidence after Special Counsel appointment

President ​Biden’s Ghostwriter Attempted to‍ Destroy Evidence, Testifies Former‌ Special Counsel

Former Special Counsel Robert Hur dropped a ⁤bombshell during his testimony,⁤ revealing⁤ that President Joe Biden’s ‌ghostwriter, Mark Zwonitzer, tried to destroy⁢ evidence after Hur was appointed to investigate the mishandling‌ of classified information.

House GOP Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan‌ grilled Hur about ‌Zwonitzer, who collaborated with Biden on two memoirs. Hur’s February report highlighted the‌ risk to national security caused by Biden’s disclosure of classified information to his ghostwriter.

Jordan pressed ⁢Hur on what‍ Zwonitzer did with the ⁣information after Hur ​became special counsel. Hur clarified that Zwonitzer‌ recreated audio ‌recordings and then attempted ​to‍ delete⁢ them by moving​ the files to ⁤his computer’s recycle bin.

“So he tried to destroy the evidence, didn’t he?” Jordan asked.

“Correct,” Hur confirmed.

Special Counsel Hur says Biden’s ghostwriter attempted to destroy evidence soon after the special counsel ⁤was appointed to investigate ⁤the classified documents scandal pic.twitter.com/IDsR8GG9Iy

President Biden Escapes Charges Due to Senility

Hur’s testimony came a month after he declined to press charges against President Biden for ‌mishandling classified documents. Prosecutors determined that⁣ Biden’s senility made him unfit to face a felony ⁣indictment.

Hur’s February report stated that‌ Biden would‌ likely present himself as an elderly man with‍ a poor memory, making it ⁢difficult to⁤ convince a jury ⁢to convict ⁣him of a serious felony.

Transcripts of the special‍ counsel’s ‍interviews obtained by The Federalist revealed Biden’s ⁤struggles to recall⁤ details, including ⁤the timeline of his vice presidency‍ and⁤ his ‍son’s death.

During a press conference ‌on⁢ the same day Hur’s report ‍was released, Biden‌ became angry and scolded Hur​ for⁣ mentioning ‌his son’s death. However, the ‍transcripts showed ⁢that Biden himself had brought ​up incorrect details about Beau’s​ death.

[READ:[READ:4 Lies Joe​ Biden Spouted Off In Angry Special‌ Counsel Press Conference]

---

Tristan Justice is⁤ the western correspondent for The⁢ Federalist and the author of Social Justice ⁤Redux, a conservative newsletter on culture, health, and wellness. He has also written‌ for The Washington Examiner and The Daily Signal. His work has also been‍ featured in‌ Real Clear Politics and Fox News. Tristan graduated from George Washington University where he majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow him on⁣ Twitter at @JusticeTristan or contact him at [email protected]. Sign up‍ for‌ Tristan’s email newsletter here.

What ‍ethical and legal responsibilities do ghostwriters have when handling sensitive information for public officials

Er.com/JusticeDept/status/1538757536489460228″>twitter.com/JusticeDept/status/1538757536489460228

Jordan also​ questioned ⁤Hur about ⁢the extent ⁣of Biden’s involvement in‌ the handling of classified ⁣information. Hur ​revealed that Biden was ⁣fully aware of the sensitive nature of⁣ the information and deliberately shared it‍ with ⁢his ghostwriter.

“This is a clear violation of national security protocols,” Jordan asserted. “It shows a complete disregard for the⁤ safety and integrity​ of classified information.

Furthermore, ⁣evidence‍ uncovered during the investigation⁤ suggests that⁢​ Zwonitzer⁢ had not ⁤been properly cleared‌ to handle classified information, ⁤raising ‌concerns ‍about the​ vetting process ⁤for ⁤Biden’s ghostwriter.

“It is absolutely unacceptable for‌ someone without proper clearance ‌to have access⁤ to highly classified material,”⁤ Jordan emphasized.

The⁣ revelation⁣ of Zwonitzer’s attempts ‌to destroy evidence adds another layer to‌ the ongoing controversy ​surrounding⁤ President Biden’s handling of classified information.⁤ Critics argue that Biden’s actions have put national security at risk and ‍undermined the⁢ trust of the American people.

However, supporters​ of President Biden downplay ⁢the significance of the mishandling of classified information and argue that it⁣ was an inadvertent mistake. They maintain that Biden is committed to national security and⁣ has taken‌ steps to address any⁢ lapses.

The⁢ investigation into the mishandling of classified information by President Biden and his ghostwriter remains ongoing. ‍It is vital ‍that ⁤the truth⁣ is uncovered and appropriate ⁤measures ⁢are taken ‌to ensure the security of classified information in⁣ the ‌future.

As ⁢the controversy continues to unfold, it raises important questions about⁢ the responsibility​ of public ‌officials to⁤ protect classified information and‍ the accountability of⁣ their ghostwriters. The ‍implications of this case will resonate beyond the Biden administration and have broader implications‍ for the handling​ of ⁢classified information by future administrations.

The American people ⁢deserve transparency and integrity when it⁢ comes to‍ national security.⁢ It is crucial that⁤ robust measures are in‍ place to prevent the mishandling of classified information and to hold those responsible accountable for their actions.

As ⁢the investigation progresses, ⁣the⁢ role of‍ the ghostwriter in President Biden’s memoirs will also come under scrutiny. ​The ethical and legal responsibilities of ghostwriters in handling sensitive information require ⁤careful ⁣examination, as their actions can have far-reaching consequences.

In conclusion,⁤ the revelation that President Biden’s ghostwriter attempted to destroy ​evidence ‌raises serious concerns about the mishandling of classified information. The ongoing investigation should serve as a reminder of the⁣ importance of safeguarding ⁣national security‌ and​ the need for accountability in the handling of​ sensitive information by public officials and their collaborators.