Hunter Biden confirms Joe Biden was the person referred to as “The Big Guy” in a message about a Chinese business deal

Hunter Biden Confirms “Big Guy” Refers to President ‌Joe⁢ Biden ⁤in ​China Deal Proposal

In a recent deposition,​ Hunter Biden revealed that⁢ the ⁣mysterious⁢ “big guy” ⁢mentioned in a proposal involving a Chinese company linked to the Communist Party of China was none⁤ other than President Joe Biden himself. ⁣This revelation ​adds a new layer of ⁢intrigue to the ongoing ⁤controversy ⁢surrounding Hunter’s business dealings.

During ‍the deposition, Hunter⁤ clarified that a message from‌ his ‌business associate, James Gilliar, which stated that a 10% stake in the CEFC China Energy ⁤deal was “held by H ‌for the​ big guy,” was indeed referring⁣ to his father. ⁢However, ‌Hunter emphasized that Joe Biden was unaware of the proposal ‌and had no involvement⁣ in the deal whatsoever.

According to a transcript of the deposition, Hunter expressed confusion about Gilliar’s‍ statement,‌ stating, “I truly‍ don’t know⁣ what the ⁢hell⁢ that James was talking about. My⁤ father’s never been ​involved‌ with my business. He’s never benefited from my business, and he’s never taken action‍ to benefit⁤ me⁣ or any ‌of my business.”

When questioned about ‌why Gilliar would‌ suggest⁣ involving Joe ‍Biden in the deal, Hunter explained that it ‍was his⁤ associates who desired the former​ vice president’s participation. He pointed out that Joe Biden was no longer an elected ‍official and not seeking office, making him an attractive⁤ addition to ‌their business venture.

House Republicans Dispute Hunter’s Claims

However, House Republicans have a different perspective on Joe Biden’s involvement ‍in his ⁤son’s business. Last year, House Oversight and Accountability Chairman​ James Comer (R-KY) alleged that bank records revealed Joe Biden received ⁢$40,000 in laundered money⁣ from a Chinese‍ company affiliated with CEFC.

According to Comer, the money originated from Northern International Capital,⁢ a Chinese company connected to ⁤CEFC. After‌ passing through various⁢ Hunter Biden-linked entities, it eventually reached Joe ⁤Biden in the form​ of a⁤ $40,000 check ‌labeled ​as a “loan repayment” ‌from his brother⁢ James and sister-in-law Sara.

Comer’s timeline suggests that ‍the money⁢ transfers ⁣began just days after Hunter had ⁢allegedly invoked his father’s name in a WhatsApp message to⁣ a CEFC associate. The message, which‍ hinted at potential consequences if certain commitments were ​not fulfilled, contradicts Hunter’s claim that he was not ⁢with his father at the time.

During the deposition, Hunter attributed ‌the message to being under the influence of ⁤substances and denied being with his father. However, critics argue⁤ that photographic ⁣evidence⁣ showing⁣ him at ⁢his father’s house on the day the messages were sent contradicts his defense.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+‍ APP

How does the connection to a Chinese company linked‌ to⁣ the Communist Party of China raise further ⁤concerns about the Biden administration’s approach to China?

Business ​deal. Hunter stressed that it was solely Gilliar’s decision to use the term “big guy” to refer ⁤to Joe Biden, and that his father had no knowledge of it.

The revelation of President Joe Biden’s involvement, albeit indirectly, in this Chinese ⁢deal proposal​ raises concerns about potential conflicts⁤ of⁤ interest and the⁤ influence of foreign entities on the Biden family. Critics argue that this ‍new information validates their skepticism regarding the ethical implications of Hunter Biden’s business dealings.

Furthermore, this disclosure comes at a time when⁣ the Biden administration is facing scrutiny ‍over its approach to China. President Biden has been vocal about the need‍ to address China’s unfair trade practices and human ‍rights abuses, which​ makes the connection to a‌ Chinese company linked to the Communist Party of China all the more concerning.

The deposition also sheds light on the intricate network of‍ business​ relationships and associations in which Hunter ⁤Biden has been involved. It raises questions about his qualifications,‍ expertise, and the influence he may ‍have wielded as the son of a high-ranking political ‌figure. Critics argue that it is difficult ‍to disentangle Hunter Biden’s‌ personal⁣ business interests from his father’s political career,⁣ making it inherently problematic.

The issue of Hunter Biden’s business dealings has been a contentious topic ⁤since before the 2020 presidential election. ‌Accusations of corruption and nepotism have been levied ⁣against the Biden family, with critics suggesting that⁣ Hunter’s business ventures were facilitated by ‌his father’s position ⁢and connections.

This recent confirmation of the link between the “big guy” and ​President Joe Biden only adds fuel to the fire.‌ It reinforces the⁣ skepticism surrounding the integrity and transparency ⁢of the Biden family’s financial affairs.

It is important to note that‍ Hunter Biden’s​ confirmation does not imply any legal wrongdoing on behalf of President ‌Joe Biden. However, it does raise significant ethical concerns, particularly regarding transparency,‌ accountability, and the potential for undue influence.

This revelation will undoubtedly fuel further investigation and scrutiny into⁢ Hunter⁢ Biden’s business ⁢dealings, and his father’s potential knowledge⁣ or involvement. It remains to be seen how this new⁢ information will impact public perception ⁢of the Biden administration and its ability to effectively address concerns surrounding conflicts of interest and foreign influence.