[]
the federalist

Democrats, led by Gavin Newsom, caused immense damage to our beloved state

California’s Decline: From Golden State to Steaming Pile of Dung

California Gov.⁤ Gavin Newsome is straight out of central casting for a perfect liberal: JFK looks ‌but without JFK’s pesky conservative⁣ beliefs.

All perfect‍ leftists have an accidental view of history, and Newsom ⁣has a Ph.D. in accidents. To be a perfect leftist you‌ have to subscribe to the theory that ‌things just… happen. The basic philosophy ​and matching campaign rhetoric is: All the bad things ‌you see — from homelessness and crime to inflation and war — are accidental. They could​ have happened‍ to anybody ​regardless of policies, so give Democrats more of your money, and don’t ask about outcomes.

The Downfall of a ⁤Once-Magical State

  • California was a paradise in⁢ the ’70s and ’80s,⁣ a place where kids felt like gods.
  • But now, the state is plagued by crime​ and fear, with residents living in constant danger.

People outside California look at it now and wonder: How did it all go so wrong? How could ‍the⁢ greatest place on the planet ‍turn into the steaming ​pile of dung it is today? The‍ “what” isn’t complicated. The ⁤state went from red⁣ to blue in the early ’90s. And while there is debate as to the reasons it flipped, when it did, the state declined rapidly with no end in sight.

It’s easy to⁣ blame politicians, but we can’t leave out the voters. Why would voters keep electing people who continuously preside over⁤ the state’s decline? It’s because they have bought‌ the premise that outcomes‌ are ⁢accidental, or it’s someone else’s fault combined with perceived‍ intent.

For instance: Crime⁣ didn’t spike because we‍ changed the law ⁢to allow shoplifting under $950; it spiked in‌ spite‍ of that law, or because of Covid, or due to not enough⁢ early-education funding. That ⁢law passed because leftists convinced voters that the intent of the law mattered more than the‌ foreseeable outcome. Or⁤ another example: Getting rid of⁤ anti-camping laws didn’t increase⁣ homelessness,⁣ the price of homes did. Because anti-camping laws are evil, according to liberals. Getting rid of those laws shows Democrats are ⁢good people — again, selling‍ intent, not outcomes.

What a maddening existence conservatives have in California. Inside,⁤ they are screaming at voters, but they know it won’t change anything. Some leave, of course, but some can’t. ‌Others won’t​ leave behind family ⁢and‍ friends. California voters routinely say they didn’t‍ vote ​for this or​ that. Sure, just⁤ like no one bought Nickelback albums. Someone is ⁢voting for⁢ this garbage, and it isn’t the minority party.

The⁢ Democrats’ Blame Game

  • Democrats excel at shifting ‍blame and avoiding responsibility for their failed policies.
  • They⁢ focus on intent ‍rather than outcomes, selling​ their voters on false narratives.

In the red-versus-blue ‍governors’ debate ‌between Newsom and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, there ​was an unmistakable rhythm to the answers. DeSantis talked about what he had done⁤ and achieved, and Newsom talked about what he had planned or how‌ much money was thrown at a problem.

That’s not a novel approach for Democrats; it’s exactly how they​ frame national problems too. When Biden took office​ and made changes to‌ Trump’s border policy‍ — voila! Border chaos ensued. So the White House went looking for “root⁢ causes,” knowing they threw open the door and what would result, all the while selling their voters that ‍it wasn’t happening. Then they acknowledged it was happening, but it was the other guy’s ​fault — and in ​fact, it was his policies that delayed the ‍chaos just long enough so it⁣ would be unleashed on the Biden​ administration.

My favorite one is when Democrats tell us gas is expensive because⁣ Big Oil is greedy. Newsom tried to sell that one during the debate, even going so far as to specifically accuse⁤ Big Oil of‌ hating Californians.⁤ So⁤ Big‍ Oil ‍is greedy just in ⁣California? Or they weren’t greedy​ during the Trump administration, just during the Biden one? To conservatives, it’s a laughable excuse, but voters in the majority party in California must believe it because their ⁣voting record bears that out.

The Destruction of California

  • Newsom and his party have​ successfully indoctrinated voters into believing their policies don’t lead to bad outcomes.
  • California has gone ‍from a place people ⁤flocked to, to a place‌ they now flee.

Newsom famously admitted they cleaned up San Francisco for the​ Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit, and the right-leaning media (rightfully) pounced. Why did he admit to that with a smug smile⁢ on his face?​ Because he knew ​California​ voters won’t⁢ punish him ⁣or his⁢ party. Why should⁣ he be⁣ concerned? Since the early ’90s, he‌ and his party have wreaked havoc, and not only do they ‍keep winning⁤ elections,⁢ but they are stamping out the last of the conservative counties in the process.

Newsom chided DeSantis, saying the Florida Republican was ‍disparaging the great city ‌of‌ Los Angeles for having the temerity to mention the outcomes that Angelenos were experiencing‍ under Newsom’s party. Newsom got on his‍ soap box and raised ​his voice to ​protest DeSantis’ characterization of the conditions on the ground, knowing that⁤ he and his party lit the ⁢fuse that ⁣led to the combustion of a once-great city.

But the faux indignation isn’t fooling California conservatives. We know Newsom and his party don’t give a second ‌thought to⁣ the state’s destruction, nor the residents​ who are ‍collateral damage, because in California next November, like ⁢clockwork, Democrats will again ⁢prevail up and​ down the ballot and⁤ all across the state.


What role do voters play⁢ in perpetuating California’s decline, despite the politicians’ responsibility?

‍ Title: California’s Decline: From ​Golden State to Steaming Pile of ⁣Dung

Introduction:

California,⁣ once known as the Golden ​State, has experienced a significant decline in recent years. From⁢ its golden era in‌ the ’70s and ’80s ​to the current state of crime‍ and fear that plagues its residents, many wonder⁤ how it all ​went so wrong. While politicians certainly bear responsibility, the voters play a⁤ crucial role in continuously electing representatives who preside over this decline. This article explores the reasons behind California’s downfall, the role of voters, and the Democrats’ ⁤blame game.

The Downfall of ‍a Once-Magical State:

California was⁢ once considered a paradise, especially for​ children who felt like gods in the ’70s and ’80s. However, today ⁣the state grapples with high crime rates and constant fear, leaving its residents exposed to ⁤danger. The ⁤question of how such a promising place could transform‍ into a steaming pile of‍ dung requires examination.

Political Shift and Rapid Decline:

The state’s transformation from red to ​blue in the early ’90s marked a turning point in its⁣ decline. While the reasons ‍for this shift are still debated, ⁣there is no denying the rapid decline that followed. However, it’s not just the politicians who deserve blame. Voters ‌have played a crucial role in perpetuating this decline by succumbing to the notion that outcomes are accidental ⁤or the fault of‍ others.

Intent vs.⁢ Outcomes:

Many ⁤Californian voters have been convinced that intent outweighs ​outcomes. For instance, the spike‍ in crime was not seen as a result of changing the law to allow shoplifting under $950 but rather as a consequence of ⁢other factors like the pandemic or ‌lack of early-education funding. Similarly, abolishing⁣ anti-camping laws was justified by liberals as a way to address homelessness, shifting blame⁣ from this decision to the rising ‌housing prices.

The Frustrations of Conservatives:

Conservatives in California are left frustrated, as their concerns fall on deaf ears. Though they vehemently disagree with the voting patterns, their objections rarely lead to significant change.‍ Some ​conservatives leave the state, but others are unable to do so ‍due to familial ties or other commitments. ⁤The discrepancy between what‍ Californians claim to ‍have voted for ‌and the actual outcomes exposes the contradiction in the state’s ​electoral⁤ landscape.

The Democrats’ Blame Game:

Democrats have excelled in shifting blame and avoiding accountability for their‌ failed policies. They focus on intent rather than ‌outcomes, using false⁤ narratives to convince their voters. In debates such as the one between ⁢Gavin Newsom and⁤ Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, Democrats often discuss their‌ plans‌ and the money invested, while their ⁢opponents highlight their achievements and tangible results.

Conclusion:

The decline ‍of California has⁣ been fueled by a combination of political shifts, ​voter mindsets, and the Democrats’ blame ‍game. Without acknowledging the ‍unintended consequences ⁣of policies and holding politicians accountable​ for their actions,⁢ the state’s ​decline is likely to continue. It is essential for Californians‍ to critically evaluate their choices and prioritize outcomes over perceived intentions to restore the state to ⁢its ⁤former glory.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker