House rejects motion to expel Rep. George Santos
The House of Representatives Rejects Attempt to Expel Rep. George Santos
The House of Representatives shot down another attempt to expel Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) on Nov. 1, this time led by his fellow New York Republicans.
The resolution to expel Mr. Santos, introduced last week by Rep. Anthony D’Esposito (R-N.Y.), was the second to come up for a vote this year after Democrats tried to oust the embattled congressman in May.
At that time, Republicans blocked the move by referring the resolution to the House Ethics Committee for its ongoing investigation.
Related Stories
-
Rep. George Santos Arraigned on New Criminal Charges
10/27/2023
-
George Santos Faces 10 New Charges in Superseding Indictment
10/10/2023
In the latest case, the chamber rejected the measure outright in a 179-213 vote. A two-thirds majority was required for it to pass.
Mr. Santos garnered national attention late last year when he admitted to fabricating his resume to get elected. He now stands accused of 23 federal crimes, including conspiracy, money laundering, wire fraud, credit card fraud, false statements, and aggravated identity theft, among others.
A trial has been tentatively scheduled for next September.
Prior to the vote, the congressman maintained his innocence of the allegations against him, charging that his colleagues were targeting him for political gain.
“This expulsion, unfortunately, is politically motivated by some members within this body,” he said on the House floor. “They believe that by attempting to expel me they will garner political points, capitalize on political fundraising, and receive congratulations from those who do not approve of my voting record.”
“Now tell me it’s not political!” he wrote. “I won’t stop fighting for conservative values, unlike some who are making their career based on attacking me and fundraising off of it. That’s why I have a 100% conservative voting record.”
But on the House floor, Mr. D’Esposito disputed the allegation that the move was political, asserting that he would have put forward the resolution regardless of whether he represented “a bright red district or the brightest of blue districts.”
Fitness for Office
The resolution was backed by several other New York Republicans who felt that Mr. Santos’s admitted dishonesty, combined with the accusations against him, made him unfit to serve as a U.S. representative.
Among those congressmen was Rep. Mike Lawler, who rose to defend the measure on the floor.
“You don’t expel a member for being a jerk. You don’t expel a member for something they said. You expel a member for their conduct,” he noted. “The conduct of Mr. Santos has been embarrassing and unbecoming and unfit for public office.”
Mr. Santos, however, stressed his right to due process.
Ethics Probe
A day before the vote, the House Ethics Committee released a statement on the status of its eight-month probe, noting that it continues to “expeditiously review” the allegations against Mr. Santos.
Thus far, the committee’s investigative efforts have involved contacting roughly 40 witnesses, reviewing more than 170,000 pages of documents, and issuing 37 subpoenas.
“The Committee’s nonpartisan staff and the ISC [Investigative Subcommittee] Members have put countless hours into this investigation, which has been a priority for the investigative team and involved a significant amount of the Committee’s resources,” the panel added.
The committee is expected to announce its next steps on or before Nov. 17. It remains to be seen whether it will recommend further action.
Rep. John Rutherford (R-Fla.), who sits on the Ethics Committee, said he voted present, citing the panel’s upcoming report on Mr. Santos.
“That’s the due process that Santos has,” Mr. Rutherford told The Epoch Times after the vote. “So I think a lot of people are like, well let’s just wait till we get the report and then make a decision.”
Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), who voted against the expulsion attempt, argued that it was too early to make the move given the pending criminal case.
“Due process and the courts matter, so leave it to the courts,” Mr. Roy told reporters after the vote.
“With all due respect to my New York colleagues, I’m not interested in playing politics with somebody’s legal situation.”
How does the recent vote in the House regarding Mr. Santos’s expulsion reflect the divisions and disagreements within the Republican Party
Believe in the American principles of fairness and justice,” Mr. Santos stated. “I believe in the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. I have faith in our legal system to determine the truth and I am confident that I will be cleared of these false charges.”
The Ethics Committee Investigation
The resolution to expel Mr. Santos was referred to the House Ethics Committee, which has been conducting an investigation into the allegations against him since May.
However, critics argue that the committee’s investigation has been slow and insufficient.
“The committee has had more than enough time to conduct a thorough investigation into the serious allegations against Mr. Santos,” said Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.). “It is clear that the committee’s failure to take decisive action is a disservice to the American people and undermines the integrity of the House.”
Supporters of Mr. Santos believe that the ongoing investigation should have been allowed to run its course before any attempt to expel him.
The Future for Rep. George Santos
With the latest attempt to expel him rejected by the House, Mr. Santos can continue to serve as a U.S. representative. However, his future remains uncertain as his trial approaches.
If found guilty of the charges against him, Mr. Santos could face severe consequences, including imprisonment and the immediate revocation of his seat in the House of Representatives.
The recent vote in the House has once again highlighted the divisions and disagreements within the Republican Party over Mr. Santos’s conduct and the appropriate action to take.
While some Republicans argue that it is important to uphold the integrity of the House by expelling a member who has admitted to falsifying his resume and is now facing criminal charges, others emphasize the need to respect the legal process and allow the Ethics Committee investigation to reach its conclusion.
As the trial date approaches, the public will be watching closely to see how the allegations against Mr. Santos unfold and what impact they may have on his political career.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
