Conservative News Daily

Taylor Swift’s movie dominates Hollywood for second week in a row, causing panic.

Is Hollywood in Trouble? Taylor Swift’s Movie Dominates the Box Office

So … is this a sign that Hollywood is in deep trouble? Or just a ⁣sign that Taylor Swift has the most maniacal (and that’s mostly a pejorative)‌ fans on the face of⁢ the planet?

Honestly? It’s probably a little bit of⁢ both … but more of the former.

For the‍ unaware, new NFL fan ⁢Taylor Swift ⁤released a⁢ “movie” in theaters on Oct. 13. Those quotes are there to denote ​that this film is largely just an at-home viewing of one of ‍her concerts, specifically her wildly successful “Eras” tour.

It is not a​ traditional movie‌ in any sense of ‌the word.

That fact has not stopped the film from dominating‍ the box office.

According to Deadline’s latest numbers, “Taylor⁢ Swift: Eras Tour” has raked in a hearty $131.1⁢ million at the box office since releasing a little ⁢over a week ago.

That $131.1 million, when broken down however,⁣ should furrow the brows of Hollywood ‍executives — because there’s a lot to unpack, and most ⁢of it isn’t good for ​Hollywood.

A Hollywood Prestige Piece Falls Short

First and foremost, a Hollywood prestige piece was‌ unable to ‌knock “Eras Tour” off its perch, despite the prestige piece‌ debuting and Swift’s film entering its second weekend.

Per Deadline, ⁣“Killers of the Flower Moon,” a lengthy period piece starring Leonardo DiCaprio‍ and directed by⁣ the legendary Martin Scorsese, brought in $23 million in its debut⁢ weekend.

Swift’s concert film brought in over $31 million (there appears to​ be‌ a dispute if it’s $31 million or $32 million at the box office).

Now, it’s certainly debatable if Scorsese still holds the cachet he held​ at the peak of⁣ his powers, and there’s nothing wrong with ​making $23 million in your opening weekend.

But⁢ it’s hard not to juxtapose “Killers,” a prestige period piece with star power up and down‌ the credits, with “Eras,” a bubbly, pop music concert‍ (that also features a lengthy run time​ of two hours and 49 minutes) that almost feels more like an add-on to a proper concert than a movie.

A Game-Changing‍ Move by Taylor Swift

Perhaps even more concerning than the raw numbers and what they ​mean is ​the manner in which Swift produced this film.

As Fox Business points out, Swift completely skipped out on a rather sizable middle man: Hollywood ‍studios.

Swift instead‌ opted to work directly with a theater chain (AMC Theaters in this case), effectively eliminating whatever notable cut that studios typically take from a movie’s profits.

It’s a brilliant ⁢move by her (to⁣ her minimal credit, Swift may be a far-left loon, but⁣ she ‍is ⁢an outstanding capitalist) and a rather worrisome one for studios.

Because if Swift is onto‍ something here, with the way she simply cut out a studio to work directly with a distributor, that could drastically alter the way Hollywood operates.

For many ⁢people, a Hollywood reboot (as‌ overwrought as reboots are in 2023) would actually ⁢be a rather significant improvement — even if Swift is the catalyst for it.

Unique Circumstances or Swift’s Star Power?

Now, of course, there is a chance that Hollywood⁤ executives aren’t ​giving this ⁣a passing thought because it’s Taylor Swift — arguably the​ most famous person, at the very least the ‍most famous musician, in the world currently.

That’s‌ the kind of clout and power that money can’t buy, so it’s fair to wonder if these unique trappings (the​ low $15 million budget for the movie, the cutting out of a Hollywood studio) are solely unique to Swift.

Indeed, not too many people‌ are as popular or influential as Swift ​is in 2023.

In fact, Deadline⁣ noted that the “Eras Tour [became] the first concert film in history to⁣ make more than $100 million at the‌ domestic box office and did so in just five days of showtimes.”

So this route of navigating​ Hollywood may not be possible for everyone, save for ​the richest and most famous.

But at the very least, it provides a blueprint of how to “win” in Hollywood⁤ without abiding by its rules.

That’s pretty neat​ (well, maybe not to Hollywood executive-types)‌ — even if it did originate with the deeply polarizing Taylor Swift.


.author_subscription_pitch p{margin:5px;}

An Urgent ‍Note from Our Staff:

The Western Journal has been labeled “dangerous” simply because⁤ we‍ have a biblical worldview and speak the truth ‍about what is happening⁢ in America.

We refuse to let Big Tech and woke advertisers dictate the content we share with our ⁢community. We stand for truth. We stand for freedom. We stand with our readers.

We’re asking you to help us in this fight. We can’t do​ this without you.

Your donation directly helps fund our ‍editorial team of writers and editors. Your support means we can continue to ⁢expose false narratives and defend traditional American values.

Please stand with us by donating today.

Thank you for your support!

The post Hollywood Should Be Panicking After Taylor Swift’s Movie Takes Top ​Spot for 2nd Straight Week appeared⁤ first on The Western Journal.

What does the popularity of Taylor Swift’s concert film suggest about the ⁣changing preferences of audiences and the demand for alternative types of content in ‌the entertainment industry

Ithout ​necessarily relying on the⁣ traditional studio system. It shows that there are ⁢alternative⁣ paths to success and profitability in the industry.

What Does This Mean for Hollywood?

This dominance of Taylor Swift’s concert film raises some intriguing questions for the future of Hollywood. Will more artists follow in her⁢ footsteps and bypass the studio system altogether? Is this a⁢ sign of a changing landscape in the industry?

Hollywood⁣ has long been seen ​as the epicenter⁢ of the entertainment world, with the power to make or break careers. But if artists like Taylor Swift can find success on their‍ own‍ terms, ‌it may signal ⁤a shift in ⁣the power dynamics. ‍The traditional studio system ⁢may ⁣no longer hold the same level of ⁢control ‍and influence.

Furthermore,‍ this success highlights the changing preferences of audiences. Swift’s concert film resonated with fans, drawing in millions ‍of ‌viewers and earning millions of dollars at the box office. It suggests that there is a demand for different types of content beyond the⁣ traditional blockbuster movies.

However, it’s essential to note that this success could be attributed to Taylor Swift’s exceptional stardom. She holds a level of fame and influence that few others possess. So while her approach may be‍ effective for her, it might not be feasible for everyone.

Ultimately, Hollywood’s response to this development will determine its future. Will studios adapt and find‍ new ways to attract audiences? Or will ‍they continue to rely on formulas and established franchises?

One thing is clear:‍ the industry must be open to change and embrace new approaches. Taylor Swift’s movie dominating the‍ box office serves as a wake-up call⁤ for Hollywood to explore new‍ avenues and evolve with the⁢ times.

In conclusion, Taylor Swift’s concert ‍film’s success in the box⁤ office raises questions⁢ about the state ‍of Hollywood.‍ It challenges the traditional studio system and suggests that alternative paths to ‍success are possible. While this may be an isolated case of one artist’s exceptional fame, it highlights the changing preferences of audiences. Hollywood must be willing to adapt and explore new approaches to remain relevant in an ‌ever-evolving ⁣entertainment landscape.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker