History Has Changed
Thank you Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy Fox News and (R-CA). Tucker CarlsonOfficially, there has been a change in the record for the Jan 6 Capitol Hill Riot.
Many who are aware of the story argue that the House of Representatives narrative is misleading. January 6 Committee Legacy Media and its allies have been mostly bogus since the beginning. Carlson now has video footage to support their claims.
As a result, the American public — and future generations — are one step closer to having a full look at all the available evidence and drawing their own conclusions as to what really happened that day.
McCarthy was the speaker and gave Carlson access to more than 40,000. He had the authority to give Carlson more than 40,000 hours of Capitol security footage. The Republic would be at risk, according to Leftist critics. Some journalists suddenly got up to demand that the footage be made available to them, while others worried about conspiracies.
The Fox News host said that we discovered several differences in Congress’s portrayal of the event on its first night.
Contrary to the official story, the video evidence allegedly shows that Q-Anon Shaman was led around the building by police who could have been arrested at any moment — he wasn’t rampaging through like some madman. According to the evidence, Congressman Barry Loudermilk (R. Georgia) didn’t give rioters a tour of the capitol on Jan 5. The senator Josh Hawley, R-MO, was not alone to escape the mob. Security footage shows him doing so on his own.
These claims have been discussed for more than 24 months now, but it has been just chatter — not necessarily video content. James O’Keefe is an investigative journalist. “Content is king. Everything else is just gossip.”
Many of the gossip may be confirmed by security footage. More to follow. This is his first segment.
Virtually everyone in Washington, Republican and Democrat, did not want to see the tape being released tonight. pic.twitter.com/YfpvaIZTbn
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) March 7, 2023
There is little reason to question Carlson’s story until more evidence is available. Carlson’s track record is certain to be more reliable than that of J6 Committee and any lapdog journalists who reported on the same day.
Because the inaccuracies of the government are now exposed, their entire version of the story — which was put forth as entirely factual — must be called into question by those who have bought it at face value.
Listen to Representative Thomas Massie, R-KY. Carlson heard from him that the clips had changed his mind. “perception” of what happened — and he was there:
Respondents believe the Feds were responsible for inciting J6 protests at 61%. And we know that they were. To see the tapes they made, we need to have a complete list of Feds present Jan 6.@TuckerCarlson pic.twitter.com/SzftS0GpET
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) March 7, 2023
A lot more transparency is needed, however. Carlson may have reached a conclusion and opinion based upon the facts, but it might not be true to the truth.
All video should be available so that the whole truth can be seen. You should care about trusting others and sharing correct information.
It doesn’t appear that journalists really want it.
Mainstream media have often been content to rehash the J6 story rather than searching for solutions.
Nancy Pelosi, former Speaker of the House (D-CA), could have shown this footage to NBC or ABC. She did not. They don’t appear to care.
Many of these outlets now carry water for the power elite by accusing Carlson as a propagandist.
NBC News ran a story, “Tucker Carlson, with video provided by Speaker McCarthy, falsely depicts Jan. 6 riot as a peaceful gathering.” ABC News described it as:Capitol Police chief slams Carlson’s comments about Jan. 6 video as ‘offensive and misleading’ in internal memo.” CBS.com was reporting on Republicans that disagreed with Carlson’s character at the time this article was written.
No other legacy media outlet seems to be asking why Congress is there “misled” the American public — as Twitter CEO Elon Musk characterized it — on this matter for more than two years. It can be called negligence or malfeasance because they lack curiosity.
A quote from an older era says: “Journalism is the first draft of history.”
In recent years, journalists have been content with letting the government — particularly when aligned with the Democratic agenda — have the first crack at a record and letting it stand with very few edits.
Because of Carlson or McCarthy it is time to tear up the draft and start over. Future generations won’t be reliant on the left-wing narrative or government sources when they look back.
They could point to Carlson’s coverage and, hopefully, the original footage if it is released. Historiography has evolved.
The author views are his own, and they do not represent the opinions of The Daily Wire.
“From History Has Changed“
“The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author of the article and not necessarily shared or endorsed by Conservative News Daily”
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
