Hamas-led Gaza Health Ministry, known for false civilian casualty claims, highlighted by mainstream media.

Major American news outlets fall for Hamas ⁤propaganda on civilian casualties

Major American news outlets like The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Associated Press routinely cite the Gaza Health Ministry’s numbers for civilians purportedly killed in Israeli airstrikes, but ⁢the Hamas-run agency has a history ‍of lying about these very numbers.

After‌ Hamas launched a brutal terrorist attack⁣ on Israel on October 7, the ‌Israeli government responded quickly and forcefully, bombing⁤ Hamas targets in ‌the Gaza Strip and preparing a ground operation that is expected to begin any day. Quickly after⁢ Israel responded to Hamas’ attack ⁤with airstrikes on military targets, legacy media outlets began reporting numbers of Palestinian civilian casualties⁤ fed‌ to ​them by the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry.

The New York Times perpetuates the deception

At the top of The New ⁣York Times’ ⁤live updates on the war, ‌the legacy outlet writes, “Some two million people remain trapped in Gaza, desperate for water and other critical supplies and fearful of Israeli airstrikes that Palestinian officials ⁤say have already killed more than 2,800 people and wounded more than 10,000 others.” Those numbers come ​directly from the Palestinian Health ⁣Ministry, but the Times makes no mention of the agency’s previous lies about its death tolls.

The Times previously noted that the health ministry used deceptive tactics less than‍ a⁤ decade ago. In an article published by the Times on August 5, 2014 — in the midst of an Israeli operation⁣ in Gaza to take⁤ out terrorists — the news outlet ​ wrote that the “Palestinian Ministry of Health does not categorize victims as civilian or combatant,” meaning the Gaza-based reporting of civilian casualties was significantly higher than what Israel and the U.N. ⁢reported.

During the 2014 conflict, an opinion piece in U.S. News ​& World Report highlighted Hamas’ lies about ‌civilian casualties,⁤ stating clearly that the numbers coming from ‌the Palestinian Health Ministry ​cannot be trusted.

Hamas’ lies and ‌the⁣ complicity of Western media

“Hamas lies‌ systematically, instructing civilians to misinform the foreign press. It lies habitually, with a ‍formidable record of mendacity from previous conflicts. And it lies‍ guiltlessly, convinced that the objectives of ‘resistance’ supersede quaint notions of truth-telling,” Oren Kessler⁣ wrote on August 12, 2014. The⁤ report even went on to blast “Western media” for going ⁤along with Hamas’ casualty count.

“Nonetheless, since Israel launched Operation Protective Edge over a month ago, Western media ‍have relied on Gaza’s Hamas-run Health Ministry – as here, here and here – for casualty tallies,” the report added. “As one reporter told the Washington Post, when it comes to body counts, the Hamas Health Minister Ashraf​ Al-Qidra is​ ‘the ⁣only⁤ game in town.’”

The fog of war ⁣combined with the Gaza Health Ministry’s deceptive reporting makes gathering accurate information on Palestinian civilian casualties ‌nearly impossible. This was proven yet again when an ⁤ explosion near a Gaza hospital on Tuesday was blamed on an​ Israeli airstrike by Palestinian authorities, whose word was taken as truth by mainstream newsrooms. The Hamas-backed health ministry‍ said the blast at the hospital killed at least 500 people, and that claim was plastered ⁤on the websites and in‌ the newspapers of American legacy media outlets — again, with no explanation of the unreliable source reporting the deaths.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP

The media’s failure to fact-check

The New York Times changed its headline multiple times ⁢after the explosion near the Gaza hospital — initially running with ‍the Palestinian officials’ version of the event before updating the headline as more information came out that indicated the blast came from ⁤a⁢ failed Hamas rocket. The Times provided no editor’s note explaining the revised headline.

After the‍ blast at the hospital, The Washington Post reported, “Before the al-Alhi Hospital deaths, Israeli strikes on Gaza killed at least 2,778 people⁤ and wounded 9,700, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, and nearly two-thirds of​ those killed⁤ were children. Another 1,200 people across Gaza are believed ‍to be buried under the rubble, alive or dead, health authorities said.” The ‍death count is reported as⁤ fact with no Disclaimer ‌about the unreliability of the source it​ comes⁤ from.

Similarly, the Associated Press reported,⁤ “A massive blast rocked‍ a Gaza City hospital packed with wounded and other Palestinians ​seeking shelter Tuesday, killing hundreds of people, the Hamas-run Health Ministry said. ⁣Hamas blamed an Israeli airstrike, while the Israeli military blamed a rocket misfired by other Palestinian⁣ militants. At least 500​ people were killed, the ministry said.”

American news outlets CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CNN, and The Wall Street Journal ‌ have all followed suit by ‌reporting Hamas’ propaganda as fact, and the health ministry’s lies were also touted by sitting members of Congress, Reps. Rashida ⁣Tlaib (D-MI) and Ilhan⁣ Omar (D-MN). Both of the congresswomen have doubled down on accepting the Palestinian ‍authorities’ lies and condemning President Biden for standing ​with Israel.

What steps should news ‌outlets take ‍to exercise responsible journalism in the midst of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and why is it ⁣important for them‍ to ​present a ⁢balanced view of the​ situation

Ank” rel=”noopener”>here, here ‌ ⁤and countless other ⁢examples demonstrate — as a primary‍ source for the tally of civilians‍ ⁤killed⁣ by Israeli fire,” ⁣Kessler wrote.‍

This blatant ⁢propaganda by Hamas and the complicity of major American news outlets‍ raises serious concerns about the media’s role ‍in reporting conflicts⁢ and‌ the need for independent verification ​of⁢ information.

The⁣ Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry⁤ has a clear incentive to portray high civilian casualties. By exaggerating the⁣ number⁤ of civilian deaths, ⁣Hamas aims to delegitimize Israel’s defensive actions ⁤and ‌draw international condemnation. Hamas leaders ​know‌ that disproportionate global​ outrage ⁣could⁢ pressure⁢ Israel into​ making concessions⁢ that would benefit the ⁣terrorist organization. ​

Unfortunately, many media⁣ outlets seem all too willing⁢ to⁢ amplify Hamas’ narrative without critically examining the accuracy‌ of the information⁤ they are provided. This ⁢not only undermines ⁢the credibility of⁢ the media ⁣but also‌ perpetuates the ⁢cycle of violence by further demonizing Israel and eroding⁣ public support for its legitimate defensive actions.

In ⁢the midst of the current‍ conflict, it is crucial for news outlets to⁣ exercise responsible journalism by thoroughly vetting their sources ⁢and cross-referencing information before publishing. Failing to do so only serves to disseminate propaganda and exacerbate the‌ biases and misinformation already ‍prevalent in the reporting on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Furthermore, the media should give equal weight to Israeli and Palestinian perspectives, presenting​ a balanced view of the situation rather than ​perpetuating a one-sided narrative. By providing a‌ fair and​ accurate representation of events, ​news ⁣outlets can contribute to a more informed public debate and a better understanding of‍ the ‌complexities surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian ‌conflict.

Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the media to present the facts, challenge false narratives,‌ and uphold journalistic integrity. Falling for Hamas’ propaganda only undermines the⁢ pursuit of truth and contributes to the perpetuation of‌ violence and conflict ​in the region.