the federalist

Greene Moves to Remove Speaker Johnson Following House Approval of Major Spending Bill

Marjorie Taylor Greene⁤ Takes a Stand⁣ Against Speaker Johnson

Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene filed a motion to oust Speaker Mike Johnson‌ on Friday​ after the House passed‌ a $1.2 trillion spending⁢ bill ⁢that includes left-wing earmarks but neglects Republican voters’ priorities.

Greene is vocal about her opposition to the bill, emphasizing⁤ that it contradicts the⁢ party’s values. On ⁢the House floor, she stated, ⁢”No Republican can, in good conscience,⁣ support this bill—it’s a complete ​departure from our principles,​ especially for those who advocate‍ for being ‘pro-life’.”

A Partisan​ Divide

In ‍a bold move,⁢ Greene highlighted the bill as “a Chuck Schumer Democrat-controlled bill,” pointing out the​ significant shift‌ in power dynamics. ⁣Despite her efforts, the bill cleared ​the House with a ‍vote⁣ of 286-134,​ with​ 101 Republicans in ⁣favor.

Greene’s Motion and Its Impact

Greene introduced a​ motion⁢ to vacate ​the speakership, emphasizing⁤ that it​ serves as a⁣ warning to uphold ⁤Republican values. She views this action as an essential step in ensuring alignment with the party’s core ‌beliefs.

Regarding Johnson’s ‍response, it was reported⁢ that he‍ remains focused on governing and pushing conservative​ legislation aimed at securing⁣ borders ‌and strengthening national defense.

A Call⁣ for⁢ Action

As ⁣the debate ‌unfolds, Greene’s actions underscore the importance of maintaining a ‌unified⁣ stance within the party. The bill’s passing raises questions about prioritization ⁢and the​ alignment of legislative decisions with ⁣conservative values.

During these critical times, staying true to principles while navigating political landscapes is imperative for ‍the Republican party’s integrity and long-term goals.

[READ NEXT: The GOP Is A Fake Opposition Party With No Vision For The Country]



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker