GOP senators may use a border clause to push for additional Ukraine aid during the shutdown.
Funding Deadline Looms as Senate Republicans Push Border Security Amendment
Efforts to Secure Funding and Address Immigration Reform Criticized
- Speaker Kevin McCarthy tweeted Friday evening that the Senate bill is “dead on arrival” in the House.
- Sen. Mike Lee called out Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and the handful of Republican senators for writing the bill “in secret” as a “manipulative effort” to give an additional $6.2 billion to Ukraine.
- Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, told reporters the Senate was trying to find a “way to grow the vote to avoid a shutdown, but also to have real teeth on border and immigration reform that is credible and could potentially get done.”
Despite these efforts, a proposed border security amendment reviewed by The Federalist was found to lack substantial measures.
The amendment aimed to secure bipartisan support by enforcing immigration laws and defunding Biden’s resettlement operation without increasing spending.
However, the amendment’s provisions, such as defunding migrant transportation and reducing funding for the FEMA Shelter and Services Program, would effectively create a “Remain in Texas” policy.
Furthermore, the amendment reallocates funds to hire more Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, but fails to address potential issues with law enforcement hires and employee retention.
Additionally, the amendment claims to require the Biden administration to spend the $1.7 billion allocated for the border wall, but it remains uncertain how this would be enforced.
Republican senators involved in crafting the amendment include Sens. Bill Hagerty, John Thune, Thom Tillis, James Lankford, Susan Collins, and independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema.
Despite rumors, Sen. Katie Britt did not confirm her involvement in the amendment.
It is important to note that Sen. Cornyn’s press secretary denied his involvement in any border plan.
The Federalist’s John Daniel Davidson contributed to this report.
About the Author
Madeline Osburn is managing editor at The Federalist. Contact her at [email protected] or follow her on Twitter.
How can the allegations made by Senator Mike Lee regarding the crafting of the bill ”in secret” and diverting funds to Ukraine impact the transparency and effectiveness of proposed amendments aimed at addressing border security and immigration reform
Easures to address the current immigration crisis. The funding deadline is rapidly approaching, and it is evident that Senate Republicans are pushing for their version of border security without adequately considering the urgent need for comprehensive immigration reform.
Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s tweet on Friday evening indicates a lack of support for the Senate bill in the House. McCarthy’s assertion that the bill is “dead on arrival” highlights the deep divisions within the Republican party regarding border security and immigration reform.
Senator Mike Lee’s criticism of Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and a few Republican senators further adds to the controversy surrounding the bill. Lee accuses them of crafting the bill “in secret” as a deceptive tactic to channel funds to Ukraine instead of addressing border security issues. This accusation raises concerns about transparency and the true intentions behind the proposed amendments.
Senator John Cornyn of Texas acknowledges the Senate’s attempt to avoid a government shutdown while also incorporating measures for effective border control and immigration reforms. However, it remains to be seen whether the proposed amendments provide a credible and pragmatic solution to the border crisis.
Despite these political maneuverings, a closer examination of the proposed border security amendment reveals its shortcomings in addressing the immigration crisis. The Federalist’s review indicates that the amendment lacks significant provisions to address the root causes of mass migration, effectively process asylum claims, and create a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants already residing in the country. These are crucial aspects that need to be addressed to achieve long-term solutions and humanitarian approaches to immigration.
The looming deadline for funding forces us to evaluate the current approach and question whether enough consideration is being given to comprehensive immigration reform. While border security is undoubtedly an important component of immigration policy, it cannot be addressed in isolation. A comprehensive approach is needed to address the complexity of this issue, including factors such as economic incentives, geopolitical conditions, and international cooperation.
As the deadline approaches, it is imperative for policymakers to critically assess the proposed border security amendment and ensure that it reflects a holistic understanding of the immigration crisis. It is crucial to recognize that a sustainable solution cannot solely rely on increased border security but should also encompass comprehensive immigration reform.
The United States has a long history of being a nation of immigrants, and it is vital to uphold values of compassion while addressing border security concerns. As the funding deadline looms, it is our hope that policymakers can rise above partisan politics and work towards a comprehensive solution that not only protects our borders but also respects the dignity and rights of migrants.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
