the epoch times

GOP lawmaker receives death threats after changing speaker vote.

Republican Lawmaker Receives Death ⁣Threats ⁤After Changing Support for House Speaker

Rep. ​Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-Iowa) revealed that she has been targeted with “credible death threats” and a “barrage of threatening calls” following her decision to withdraw support for⁤ Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) during the second House speaker ballot. ‍Miller-Meeks, along with three other House ‍Republicans, initially voted⁣ for Jordan but later switched their ‌support.

In a statement, Miller-Meeks⁣ described the threats and⁣ harassment she faced and assured that her office⁢ is cooperating‍ with law enforcement. She emphasized that the proper authorities ​have been notified.

The Iowa Republican representative ​ultimately⁢ voted for⁣ Rep. Kay Granger (R-Texas) ⁤as House Speaker, citing Granger’s “great leadership” as the chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee.

“I cannot support a bully,” Miller-Meeks stated firmly. “I did not tolerate bullies when I voted for Chairwoman Granger or‌ when I initially voted for Speaker-designate Jordan,‍ and⁣ I will not yield​ to bullies now.”

Miller-Meeks explained that it became evident during ⁣the roll call vote⁣ that Jordan did not have ​the necessary 217 votes to secure the speaker role.

“Considering my concerns and the speaker-designate’s ability‌ to unify the conference, I voted in ⁤favor of Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Kay ​Granger for Speaker of the House,” Miller-Meeks clarified.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) talks to reporters as he heads from his office in the⁤ Rayburn House Office Building to the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Oct. 18, 2023. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Responding to the reported threats, Jordan condemned them as “abhorrent” and emphasized the importance‍ of unity and‌ respect among ‍Americans.

A total of six Republicans changed their votes for Jordan during the second ballot, ⁤with⁢ four, including Miller-Meeks, withdrawing their support after initially⁢ backing​ him.

Despite receiving 199 votes, Jordan fell​ short of the required 217 votes for victory, with⁤ 22 ‌Republicans voting⁣ against ⁢him.

House Minority Leader Hakeem​ Jeffries (D-N.Y.) received 212‌ votes, and‍ the remaining 22 votes were divided among other candidates.

Miller-Meeks acknowledged ​the potential backlash for her decision to vote against Jordan, stating, “I respected Jim enough‌ to vote for him [on Tuesday], knowing he did not have the votes to be elected. We have received numerous​ calls urging me to support Jim Jordan, but many others have also urged me to seek ‌a⁤ conservative consensus candidate.”

Asserting the need for a​ consensus candidate within the Republican ‌Party, Miller-Meeks stood by her choice, emphasizing ⁢the importance of​ effective House work, support for‍ Israel, and opposition to the policies of the Biden administration.

Politico reported that anonymous messages and calls were also directed at ⁢the wife of Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), urging ⁣her to convince Mr. Bacon ⁣to​ vote for Mr. Jordan, whom he continued ⁣to oppose.

The House⁢ has been at a ⁣standstill since the removal of Mr. McCarthy as speaker, and many lawmakers‌ are advocating for expanded powers for Speaker Pro Tempore Rep. Patrick McHenry⁣ to resume some House functions.

The next speaker vote is scheduled for Thursday.

What actions should be taken to address the issue⁢ of threats and harassment towards elected officials

⁣ Tee Chairman Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) speaks during a hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, U.S., ​July ⁢29, 2020. REUTERS/Kevin LamarqueGOP lawmaker receives death threats after changing speaker vote.

Miller-Meeks’ decision to withdraw her support for Rep. Jim Jordan sparked ⁢intense‍ backlash, leading to​ a⁤ stream of threatening phone calls and messages directed towards her. This‌ incident sheds light on the disturbing reality of the dangers ⁤faced by public officials who find⁤ themselves at odds with their ​party or its supporters.

It is unacceptable that ‍Miller-Meeks, a duly elected representative, has been subjected to such harassment and threats as a result ⁢of voicing her opinion and exercising her judgment. This type of behavior not ⁣only ‍undermines the principles of‍ democracy but also poses a significant threat to the safety and well-being of our elected officials.

Political disagreements are a natural part of any democracy, and it is crucial that they ‍are expressed and debated in a ‍civilized manner. Threatening⁣ and harassing individuals for taking a principled stance ⁤is not only morally wrong, but it also undermines the democratic process itself.

It is commendable that Miller-Meeks and her office are working closely with law enforcement to ensure her safety and to identify​ the individuals responsible for these threats. Swift and decisive action must be taken to hold these individuals accountable for their actions and to send a clear ⁢message that such behavior will not​ be tolerated.

Furthermore, it is essential for⁤ political leaders of all parties to ‌condemn ⁤this type of intimidation and stand in‍ solidarity⁣ with ⁤their colleague. Publicly ‌expressing support for Miller-Meeks and denouncing the threats she⁤ has received will send a



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker