oann

Google responds to claims of racial bias and historical inaccuracies in its AI technology


In this photo illustration, ⁢ A thumbprint is displayed on ⁣a mobile phone while the Google ⁣logo is displayed on a⁣ computer monitor ⁣on August 09, 2017 in London, England.‍ Founded in 1995 by⁣ Sergey⁤ Brin and Larry Page, Google now makes hundreds of products used ​by billions of people across the globe, from YouTube and Android to ​Smartbox‌ and Google⁤ Search. ​ (Photo by Leon Neal/Getty​ Images)

OAN’s Elizabeth Volberding
6:10 PM ‍– Monday,‌ March 4, 2024

Google Admits⁢ Bias in AI‌ Tool, CEO Pledges to Fix

Advertisement

In ​a memo to ⁤staff​ on Tuesday, Google CEO Sundar Pichai stated that the​ company is⁤ now addressing⁣ issues with its Gemini artificial​ intelligence (AI) tool. ‌Pichai admitted that certain text and ‌picture responses produced by the tool ​were completely ​“biased” and ‌“wholly ⁤unacceptable.”

Last week, the ‌corporation had paused ‍the use of its Gemini⁤ tool, which generates photos based​ on inputted descriptions. However, the ⁢AI-created images have been deemed inaccurate by its ‌users.

The tech giant’s CEO informed staff⁢ last Tuesday that the company is now working “around the clock” to address the tool’s racial bias, as well as other ⁣biases, and stated that the images produced by the model ‍were “completely‌ unacceptable.”

The full ⁤text ​of the ⁤memo from Pichai reads:

“I want to address the ‍recent issues with​ problematic text and⁤ image​ responses in⁤ the⁣ Gemini app (formerly Bard). ⁤I know that some of ⁢its responses have offended our users and‌ shown bias — to ⁤be clear, that’s⁤ completely unacceptable and we got it wrong. Our teams have been working around the ‍clock to address these issues. We’re already ​seeing a substantial improvement on ⁣a wide range⁤ of ‌prompts. No AI is perfect, especially at this emerging stage of the industry’s development, but​ we know the ⁣bar is high for us and⁤ we will keep at it⁣ for however long it takes. ⁢And we’ll review what happened ‍and make sure we ⁤fix it‌ at scale. Our mission‌ to⁣ organize the world’s information and make⁢ it universally accessible and ⁢useful is sacrosanct. We’ve always sought to ⁣give users‌ helpful, accurate, and unbiased‌ information⁢ in our products. That’s why people trust ⁣them. This has to be our approach for all our‌ products, ⁢including our⁤ emerging AI products. ‌We’ll be ⁢driving a clear set of actions, including‍ structural changes, updated product guidelines, improved launch processes, robust evals and red-teaming, and technical recommendations. We are⁤ looking⁤ across all of this and will⁣ make the necessary changes. Even as we ⁢learn from what went⁤ wrong here, we ⁢should also ‌build on‍ the product and⁣ technical announcements we’ve made in AI over ​the last several weeks. That includes some foundational advances⁢ in our ‍underlying models⁢ e.g. our 1 million long-context window breakthrough‍ and our‍ open⁢ models, both ⁤of which have been well received. We know what it takes to create ‌great products that‍ are⁤ used and beloved by billions of people and businesses, and with ​our infrastructure and research expertise‌ we have an incredible springboard for⁣ the AI wave. Let’s focus on what matters most: building⁤ helpful products that are deserving of our‍ users’‌ trust.”

As a result, legislatures have begun ⁤reacting to Google’s acknowledged⁤ racial and historical bias, with one GOP⁢ senator ​demanding for the “breakup” of the⁤ well-known tech company.

“This is one of the most dangerous companies in the‌ world. It actively solicits​ and forces left-wing bias⁢ down the throats ‍of the American nation,” Senator J.D. Vance‍ (R-Ohio), told FOX⁤ Business’ Maria Bartiromo‌ in a Sunday Morning Futures exclusive interview.

After ⁣discontinuing ⁢Gemini’s image-generation⁢ features, Google ⁢is now ​reportedly⁣ attempting to turn things around. Social media users claimed that Gemini had ⁤been ⁤producing historical photographs that were inaccurate and often substituted images of White people with Black,⁣ Latino[a], Native American,‌ and‍ Asian people, replacing images⁣ of ⁣Caucasians in order​ to be more racially diverse.

Additionally,‍ a number of media ‌outlets have similarly tested Gemini,‍ asking the tool to display a photo of a White individual. However, Gemini responded, stating that this request could not ⁤be fulfilled since ⁢it “reinforces​ harmful stereotypes and ​generalizations​ about ⁤people based on their race.”

The Ohio senator elaborated on how the reported bias⁢ can have effects ⁤on outside information segments, including politics.

“Think about the effect this⁢ has on the presidential election when unbiased, non-committed voters are searching things ⁣about Donald Trump, and also about Joe Biden, right before​ they cast their ballots,” Vance stated. “We cannot allow a company that is in bed with some of the worst people in the world to control ‍the flow of information and to bias it in a left-wing direction. We [have] got ⁤to​ break ⁤this company ‍up and bring back some common sense standards.”

Regarding the potential of legal action being taken ​against Google, Vance ‍asserted​ that​ there are “growing calls” from⁤ all⁤ political⁣ persuasions for the tech giant to be⁣ broken up, citing its emergence as “too ​big, too powerful.”

“My friends on the left, Maria, say they feel ‌like our democracy is under threat. The biggest way our democracy is under threat is you have these⁤ massive, international ⁣companies that are sort ‍of controlling what we⁢ think,⁢ what‍ we read, what information we consume,” Vance explained.

“That’s a big‍ problem. But I actually do think that there’s going to be growing momentum to rein‌ Google in,” he continued. ⁤“We saw this⁤ with the⁢ release of Gemini. This is‌ a radically left-wing company ‍that⁣ is trying to control how⁢ we consume information. If we let that happen, we are going⁣ to‌ get exactly what we ⁣deserve.”

House⁣ Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, a Republican from Ohio, demanded ⁣in⁢ a letter sent on Saturday that the Google parent company “Alphabet” provide an explanation for any indication ​that Gemini’s AI errors may have​ been ​influenced by the Biden‌ administration.

Google is now intending to relaunch the⁢ Gemini AI ​tool within⁤ the next⁢ few⁢ weeks, according to‍ a Google spokesperson.

Stay informed! Receive ​breaking⁢ news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

Share‍ this post!

Supreme Court blocks⁤ Colorado’s Trump ​Insurrection ban,‌ Texas will start arresting Illegal Aliens and Nikki ‌Haley wins DC

Super Tuesday is only hours away. Both Republicans and Democrats will ​have‍ elections in 15​ states.

On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor ⁣of ‌45th President Donald Trump in the ⁢Colorado ballot case, saying Trump must appear on the ballot.

Super Tuesday is on March 5th. Voters ​in California will head to the polls. This comes as the GOP is ‍seeing a bump in registered voters in the ⁣state.

Apple is betting that the more powerful models would attract consumers looking‌ to upgrade to AI-powered PCs.

Elon ​Musk alleges a breach of contract and a departure from the original mission to‍ develop AI ​for humanity’s​ benefit.

The stock market’s interest in AI is on the rise, fueled by Nvidia’s stunning rally and ​potential impact on various sectors.

UnitedHealth Group faces ​a ‌major data breach as hackers claim to have ‌stolen ​millions of sensitive records.

rnrn

What⁣ significant improvements are Google planning to make in order to address the ‌biases and inaccuracies ⁤identified in⁢ its ⁢AI tool?

​ The next few weeks, but ⁤with significant improvements to address​ the biases and inaccuracies that were identified. The‍ company‍ is committed to ensuring that its AI products provide helpful, accurate, and unbiased information to users.

The ‍acknowledgment⁣ of‍ bias in Google’s ⁢AI ‌tool raises​ important⁢ questions about the ‌role and responsibility of tech companies⁤ in shaping public discourse and information access. The ability of AI algorithms to influence⁢ public ‌opinion and⁣ perpetuate stereotypes has become a growing concern, and Google’s⁤ admission ‍of bias ⁢underscores the⁣ need ⁢for greater transparency ‍and accountability in AI development.

In response to Google’s admission, Senator J.D. ‍Vance of Ohio called for the breakup of the tech company, citing its dangerous influence and left-wing bias. Vance argued that Google’s control ⁢over the ⁢flow of information poses ⁢a threat⁤ to democracy and ‌common sense standards. He emphasized the potential impact of ​biased search results on political⁣ elections and the need⁤ to⁢ address the company’s dominance in the⁢ tech industry.

Vance’s call for the breakup⁢ of Google reflects the increasing ‌scrutiny and calls for regulation of big tech companies. The influence and power of these companies‍ have raised concerns about their ⁣impact on democracy, privacy, and fair competition. The⁤ demand for greater accountability and ‌regulation continues to ⁤grow, with politicians ⁢from both⁤ sides ‌of ⁤the political⁤ spectrum expressing concerns ⁣about the concentration of power in the hands of a few tech​ giants.

As Google works to address the bias in its AI tool, the debate over the role of‌ tech companies in shaping ‌public discourse and information​ access is likely to intensify.​ It remains⁣ to⁣ be seen what ⁢steps the company will take to address⁤ the identified biases and ensure that its AI products meet the highest standards‌ of accuracy and neutrality.

In conclusion, Google’s ‍admission of bias ⁢in its AI tool highlights ⁤the challenges and responsibilities ⁤that tech companies face‌ in developing and deploying AI algorithms. The call for‌ greater transparency, accountability, and ⁤regulation in the tech industry is growing, and Google’s⁤ case serves as ⁢a wake-up call for ​the​ need to address biases and ensure ‌the fair and unbiased use of AI technologies.‍ The outcome of Google’s efforts to​ fix the issue in ⁢its AI tool will have broader implications for⁤ the ⁢future of AI⁣ development ⁣and‌ the role of tech companies in⁣ shaping ⁤public discourse.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker