Georgia’s “Get Trump” legal battle may be dismissed if the appeals court finds that Willis has disqualified herself

The Georgia Court of Appeals is reviewing Donald Trump’s appeal against Fani Willis’s role in the state’s election case. Trump’s success could end the case against him, impacting the Democrats’ legal campaign. The⁤ judge ​allowed Trump to appeal, potentially delaying proceedings close to the election. Trump faces charges related⁣ to the 2020 election. The Georgia ‌Court of⁤ Appeals is ⁢currently assessing Donald Trump’s appeal ⁢challenging Fani ⁢Willis’s involvement in the state’s election case. If successful, Trump’s appeal might lead to ‍the dismissal of the case against ⁣him, ⁢affecting the⁤ Democrats’ legal strategy. The⁢ judge’s ⁣decision to permit Trump’s appeal could ⁢cause delays nearing the election, as Trump is facing charges linked to the 2020 election.


The Georgia Court of Appeals will consider former President Donald Trump’s appeal of a ruling that allows disgraced Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to remain principal prosecutor in the state election case. If Trump prevails, the case against the presumptive GOP presidential nominee could end as Democrats’ multi-case lawfare campaign continues to fall apart six months before the election.

In March, Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee determined Willis, the embattled prosecutor who faced disqualification for an inappropriate relationship with Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade, could continue to lead the state effort to imprison Trump for opposing election changes in 2020. The judge ruled Willis could remain on the case as long as Wade stepped down from the probe after the government paid more than $650,000 to Wade’s law firm over two years. Willis and Wade allegedly spent money ostensibly meant for Trump’s prosecution on lavish vacations to the Bahamas, Aruba, Belize, and Napa Valley.

Defendants in Willis’s politicized Georgia show trials earlier moved to have the Fulton County DA removed from the case, alleging an inappropriate affair with Wade before Willis’s office hired him. Willis and Wade denied the allegations. The district attorney testified in February that she reimbursed Wade for her share of the costs incurred on their trips together. When pressed in court on proof of reimbursement, Willis declared, “The proof is what I just told you.”

Lawyer: “You have no proof of any reimbursement [to Wade for vacations] because it’s all cash?

Fani: “The testimony of one witness is enough to prove a fact. Are you telling me I’m lying?”

Lawyer: “I’m asking if you have any proof.”

Fani: “The proof is what I just told you.” pic.twitter.com/JhD5iFaYxA

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) February 15, 2024

McAfee, who donated to Willis’s 2020 campaign, ruled the district attorney’s reimbursement claims “may be unusual and the lack of any documentary corroboration understandably concerning” but concluded the evidence “did not establish [Willis’] receipt of a material financial benefit as a result of her decision to hire and engage in a romantic relationship with Wade.”

The judge went on to allow Trump and eight co-defendants to appeal, which the Georgia Court of Appeals accepted Wednesday. The decision to hear the former president’s plea to remove the lead prosecutor is likely to significantly delay the proceedings for a second time just months before Election Day. In August, Willis charged the Republican presidential candidate with 41 charges over his 2020 election concerns. The Fulton County judge dropped six of the charges in March.

The decision by the Georgia Court of Appeals marks another win for Trump this week against the scorched-earth lawfare campaign waged to keep the Democrats’ chief political opponent from reclaiming the White House this fall. On Tuesday, U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon indefinitely postponed Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents. The trial date was previously set for May 20 but now may not take place until well after the November election after prosecutors admitted to tampering with evidence.

“The Court also determines that finalization of a trial date at this juncture — before resolution of the myriad and interconnected pre-trial and CIPA [Classified Information Procedures Act] issues remaining and forthcoming — would be imprudent and inconsistent with the Court’s duty to fully and fairly consider the various pending pre-trial motions before the Court, critical CIPA issues, and additional pretrial and trial preparations necessary to present this case to a jury,” wrote Judge Cannon.


Tristan Justice is the western correspondent for The Federalist and the author of Social Justice Redux, a conservative newsletter on culture, health, and wellness. He has also written for The Washington Examiner and The Daily Signal. His work has also been featured in Real Clear Politics and Fox News. Tristan graduated from George Washington University where he majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow him on Twitter at @JusticeTristan or contact him at [email protected]. Sign up for Tristan’s email newsletter here.

Popular



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker