Judge orders unsealing of Santos bond sponsors on Thursday.

Federal Judge Orders Unsealing of Identities of Rep. George Santos’s Criminal Bond Sponsors

A federal judge in New York has made a significant ruling in the case of embattled Rep. George Santos (R-NY), ordering the identities of the individuals who sponsored his criminal bond to be unsealed. This decision comes as a blow to Santos, who has been fighting to keep his sponsors’ identities a secret.

U.S. District Judge Joanna Seybert has set the unsealing for noon on Thursday, allowing Santos’s financial backers time to withdraw their support. In a brief ruling obtained by CBS News, Seybert stated that Santos could request a modification of his release conditions if the sponsors choose to withdraw.

This is the second time that a judge has denied Santos’s request to keep his sponsors’ identities confidential. After a magistrate judge rejected his plea, Santos appealed to Seybert, who has been assigned to oversee his case if it goes to trial. However, the court did grant Santos’s request to notify the sponsors in advance.

Background and Charges

Rep. George Santos has been under scrutiny since before he took office in January. Questions surrounding his background and finances eventually led to his indictment on 13 federal criminal charges in May. These charges include wire fraud, money laundering, theft of public funds, and making false statements to the House of Representatives.

Santos has pleaded not guilty to these charges, vehemently denying any wrongdoing and claiming that the allegations are politically motivated.

House Ethics Committee Investigation

In addition to the legal proceedings, the House Ethics Committee has also launched an inquiry into the payment and has requested the names of the individuals involved. However, Santos’s legal team has not provided this information, according to court filings. The Ethics Committee initiated the investigation after the House voted to refer the matter to the panel, temporarily saving Santos from a potential expulsion.

Santos’s defense attorneys have argued that revealing the names of the sponsors could have severe consequences, including distress, job loss, or even physical harm to them. They have also asserted that the individuals who signed the bond were family members, not lobbyists or donors.

As this case unfolds, it continues to attract attention and raise questions about the intersection of politics, law, and ethics.

Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.